<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 NEAR-TERM RISKS TO THE MARKET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/3-near-term-risks-to-the-market/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/3-near-term-risks-to-the-market</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:27:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ike tossia</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/3-near-term-risks-to-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-12737</link>
		<dc:creator>ike tossia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=17584#comment-12737</guid>
		<description>this is not about complacency. its about big shorts covering b/c they&#039;re  being told to by the clearing agent/broker and up they go. this MKT&#039;s great. just don&#039;t argue with too much stock... the quants are getting better and better. there&#039;s no prices any more. its just numbers moving. who though we&#039;d be back @1140+- so quick ? its great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is not about complacency. its about big shorts covering b/c they&#8217;re  being told to by the clearing agent/broker and up they go. this MKT&#8217;s great. just don&#8217;t argue with too much stock&#8230; the quants are getting better and better. there&#8217;s no prices any more. its just numbers moving. who though we&#8217;d be back @1140+- so quick ? its great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe 401k</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/3-near-term-risks-to-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-12733</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe 401k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=17584#comment-12733</guid>
		<description>I appreciate these warnings. The market could keep going higher, but I have to keep reminding myself not to be motivated by the &quot;fear of not making money&quot;. 

I took a little money off the table today, and I won&#039;t regret doing so, even if the rally continues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate these warnings. The market could keep going higher, but I have to keep reminding myself not to be motivated by the &#8220;fear of not making money&#8221;. </p>
<p>I took a little money off the table today, and I won&#8217;t regret doing so, even if the rally continues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Octopus</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/3-near-term-risks-to-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-12726</link>
		<dc:creator>Octopus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=17584#comment-12726</guid>
		<description>Zero sum game: another good example is  futures markets</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zero sum game: another good example is  futures markets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JZ</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/3-near-term-risks-to-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-12725</link>
		<dc:creator>JZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=17584#comment-12725</guid>
		<description>Just wasted 7 minutes of life I can&#039;t get back reading the comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wasted 7 minutes of life I can&#8217;t get back reading the comments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanH</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/3-near-term-risks-to-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-12724</link>
		<dc:creator>DanH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=17584#comment-12724</guid>
		<description>Seriously, talk about off topic....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, talk about off topic&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWF</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/3-near-term-risks-to-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-12723</link>
		<dc:creator>AWF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=17584#comment-12723</guid>
		<description>Too much pud pulling in this thread?

This article is about :

Complacency---Live to Thrill Junkies--this is not your type of market.
Of course &quot;No/Limited Short Selling&quot; does count.

Catalysts---we will get retail sales this week
Probably not good by the February weather--count on the rebound for March

China---I think they want to sell goods to the US--not the other way around.
Exchange rates are itch for these guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too much pud pulling in this thread?</p>
<p>This article is about :</p>
<p>Complacency&#8212;Live to Thrill Junkies&#8211;this is not your type of market.<br />
Of course &#8220;No/Limited Short Selling&#8221; does count.</p>
<p>Catalysts&#8212;we will get retail sales this week<br />
Probably not good by the February weather&#8211;count on the rebound for March</p>
<p>China&#8212;I think they want to sell goods to the US&#8211;not the other way around.<br />
Exchange rates are itch for these guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/3-near-term-risks-to-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-12722</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=17584#comment-12722</guid>
		<description>I think what you&#039;re missing is that there is always a fixed amount of equities, bonds and money markets in the overall pool.  It certainly changes over time (new issuance, etc), but in general it is relatively little changed in any given day, month or year in the grand scheme of things.  All buyers and sellers of these assets do is interchange them.  Ownership changes and price changes based on psychology.  

When you sell your stocks to buy a bond fund the transaction works like this:  A buys stock from B and B buys cash while A sells cash.  B then buys a bond from C who buys cash from B.  All that happened here was an exchange of instruments.  Nothing more.  

You all reallocated based on your psychology at that time.  

New issuance is a separate matter, but that&#039;s not what we&#039;ve been discussing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what you&#8217;re missing is that there is always a fixed amount of equities, bonds and money markets in the overall pool.  It certainly changes over time (new issuance, etc), but in general it is relatively little changed in any given day, month or year in the grand scheme of things.  All buyers and sellers of these assets do is interchange them.  Ownership changes and price changes based on psychology.  </p>
<p>When you sell your stocks to buy a bond fund the transaction works like this:  A buys stock from B and B buys cash while A sells cash.  B then buys a bond from C who buys cash from B.  All that happened here was an exchange of instruments.  Nothing more.  </p>
<p>You all reallocated based on your psychology at that time.  </p>
<p>New issuance is a separate matter, but that&#8217;s not what we&#8217;ve been discussing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: van</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/3-near-term-risks-to-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-12721</link>
		<dc:creator>van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=17584#comment-12721</guid>
		<description>now to keep it fair and balanced...

http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-extremely-lopsided-volume-days-are-bullish-3768.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TradersNarrative+%28Trader%27s+Narrative%29</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now to keep it fair and balanced&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-extremely-lopsided-volume-days-are-bullish-3768.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TradersNarrative+%28Trader%27s+Narrative%29" rel="nofollow">http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-extremely-lopsided-volume-days-are-bullish-3768.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TradersNarrative+%28Trader%27s+Narrative%29</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/3-near-term-risks-to-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-12720</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=17584#comment-12720</guid>
		<description>&quot;The transaction nets to zero.  Someone has to sell your stocks to you. What do you think happens to their money when they sell the stocks? It goes into the money market that you just sold.&quot;

last time; i see huge qualitative differences for the equity market depending upon whether that money market account is for a equity manager who is seeking to redeploy cash back into the equity market, or a money market account for a bond fund manager or for a cash investor who is staying in cash.

there have been a net outflow of cash from equity funds and a huge inflow of cash into bond funds and money market funds.  i think this will gradually reverse over the year as the equity market performance convinces more investors to be slightly less risk averse.

any stock transaction nets to zero, as you say, on a micro level, but you have to look at the macro level...cash that wants to be equity is a big difference from cash that wants to stay cash or be a bond.  

my final comment on this point as this is getting tiresome.  if any of you think i am an idiot for believing this, go right ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The transaction nets to zero.  Someone has to sell your stocks to you. What do you think happens to their money when they sell the stocks? It goes into the money market that you just sold.&#8221;</p>
<p>last time; i see huge qualitative differences for the equity market depending upon whether that money market account is for a equity manager who is seeking to redeploy cash back into the equity market, or a money market account for a bond fund manager or for a cash investor who is staying in cash.</p>
<p>there have been a net outflow of cash from equity funds and a huge inflow of cash into bond funds and money market funds.  i think this will gradually reverse over the year as the equity market performance convinces more investors to be slightly less risk averse.</p>
<p>any stock transaction nets to zero, as you say, on a micro level, but you have to look at the macro level&#8230;cash that wants to be equity is a big difference from cash that wants to stay cash or be a bond.  </p>
<p>my final comment on this point as this is getting tiresome.  if any of you think i am an idiot for believing this, go right ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/3-near-term-risks-to-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-12718</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=17584#comment-12718</guid>
		<description>Chris,

I didn&#039;t call you an idiot.  The comment section here is always pretty civil so let&#039;s not overreact.  

Your implication is that cash on the sidelines provides firepower for a move higher.  As if investors move out of cash and into stocks.  But that&#039;s not how it actually works.  The transaction nets to zero.  

Someone has to sell your stocks to you.  What do you think happens to their money when they sell the stocks?  It goes into the money market that you just sold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t call you an idiot.  The comment section here is always pretty civil so let&#8217;s not overreact.  </p>
<p>Your implication is that cash on the sidelines provides firepower for a move higher.  As if investors move out of cash and into stocks.  But that&#8217;s not how it actually works.  The transaction nets to zero.  </p>
<p>Someone has to sell your stocks to you.  What do you think happens to their money when they sell the stocks?  It goes into the money market that you just sold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

