3 THINGS I THINK I THINK
14 December 2009 by Cullen Roche
2 Comments
- We’re in this very odd portion of the year where volume slows to a drip and complacency easily settles in as money managers chase performance and investors lose the incentive to take action on their portfolios. Thus far, strategists such as JP Morgan and Jeff Saut at Raymond James have been correct in saying that there is limited downside into year-end as money managers will continue to buy the dips. As Q4 earnings season is right around the corner in late January, is there the potential for no sustained sell-offs as money managers buy the dips into year-end and then anticipate another solid quarter of earnings? I think that might just be the case.
- John Hussman is on point as usual in his latest missive. He says stocks are decidedly speculative at the current level. Periods in which stocks were this overvalued tend to produce very poor long-term returns:
“In short, any virtue of stocks here is decidedly speculative. Stocks are overvalued to a level from which uninspiring returns have always followed. That fact is true regardless of whether or not the economy is in a sustainable recovery.”
- The Exxon/XTO deal is more good news for the market as it’s a clear sign that credit markets are healing and risk appetites are coming back, but why do these deals always occur after the market has rallied so much? Like the private equity boom of a few years back, you have to wonder if massive deals such as this one aren’t contrarian signals….



You can put “Citi Paying back it’s TARP by issuing shares” into that contrarian drawer also.
Just finished this book last night – so I might be a bit biased on the markets. I would agree that we are in speculation mode and if we clear 1120 then next stop is 1160 or 1200.
Our response is quite different than in 1929 – fed rates are much lower, we’re more liquid, and better safety nets.
However, we still have a lot of leverage, debt and banking issues.
http://lachlan.bluehaze.com.au/books/galbraith_1929crash.html
From Chapter 10: “Cause and Consequence”
US economy was fundamentally unsound
Extracts from “The Great Crash: 1929″, John Kenneth Galbraith, First Published 1955, Page 197 to 202.
“There seems little question that in 1929, modifying a famous cliche, the economy was fundamentally unsound. This is a circumstance of first-rate importance. Many things were wrong, but five weaknesses seem to have had an especially intimate bearing on the ensuing disaster. They are:
(1) The bad distribution of income.
(2) The bad corporate structure.
(3) The bad banking structure
(4) The dubious state of the foreign balance.
(5) The poor state of economic intelligence.