ARE THE INFLATIONISTAS RIGHT?
I’ve maintained for quite some time that the greater risk to the global economy is the continuing threat of deflation (see here). In my opinion the Greek debt contagion clearly shows this to be the case. While signs of inflation appear benign at best, the dollar continues to rally and the inflationistas are once again forced to put their doomsday scenario of imminent US bankruptcy and US dollar collapse on the back burner.
In my opinion, what the inflationistas have all missed is the disconnect between actual “money printing” (I prefer button pressing) and increased money in circulation. Monetarists and Austrians have generally made the false assumption that button pressing equals increased money supply – as if the money is literally dropped out of helicopters into the hands of the public. The last 18 months have proven that is simply not the case. That is not how the monetary system actually functions. So why hasn’t all this “button pressing” turned into higher inflation? Because the money isn’t actually getting into the hands of the public. It’s mostly sitting on the floors of bank vaults (or more appropriately, in on-line accounts). As I’ve said many times before, dumping a canister of iced tea into a pitcher of water doesn’t give you iced tea – at least not until it is stirred in!
In the Fall of 2008 Ben Bernanke made the classic monetarist gaffe of assuming that banks were reserve constrained. In other words, if you can simply fill their vaults with money they will be more willing to lend. Well, that’s clearly not true. This is as silly as assuming that you can sell more apples at the market so long as you double or triple your inventory of apples. But lending, much like any market, is two sided. There has to be demand AND supply. Bankers will lend money to any creditworthy customer – they’re not reserve constrained. As of now, there continues to be very little demand for credit and even fewer creditworthy customers. This is why we have seen no pick-up in lending. Banks are effectively hoarding the cash, loan demand remains low and therefore money circulation remains weak.

Why is this happening? Because, as we’ve previously noted the private sector is still saddled with too much debt and de-leveraging continues. Adding fuel to the fire is the weak situation in the labor markets and generally low capacity utilization. This economy is still very weak despite the recent “mission accomplished” banners strewn across the covers of most major business magazines. The summation of all this has resulted in almost no actual increase in the money in the real economy.
Many have argued that the recent surge in commodity prices is a sign of impending inflation. I don’t see this as a sign of impending inflation, but rather a sign of the long-term changes in the supply/demand picture. As Absolute Return Partners recently detailed, the actual fundamental reasons for increasing commodity prices has been quite positive. World Gold Council also detailed a report on the improving fundamentals in the gold market. In addition, much of this cost push has been due to improving underlying demand in the global economy. Thus far, we are not seeing any signs that corporations cannot pass these costs (what little there are) along.
For those who are still not convinced I would reference the previous few weeks. The last few weeks have been a great example of the flawed inflationista argument. While it’s not entirely fair to cherry pick a few days I do believe the last few have been a fairly good barometer of just how wrong the inflationista argument has been. Most of the hardcore doom and gloom inflationistas believe the world is due for a crippling downturn that will involve massive sovereign defaults, a collapsing dollar and likely a depression. They might have part of that argument correct, but not due to some stroke of brilliance, but rather sheer luck. They have misunderstood the the monetary system and have failed to connect the dots. This is why the asset performance of many portfolio managers betting on such an outcome has been mediocre at best. We continue to see the EXACT opposite of their proposed scenarios play out – that is, the dollar rallies, commodities get crushed and paper assets such as bonds and cash prove to be the only true safehaven. The recent microcosm of the return of the credit crisis in recent weeks is a clear sign of how assets are likely to perform in this doomsday scenario – the inflationistas will get crushed just as they did in 2008.
Why will they get crushed in such a scenario? Because this is a continuing deflationary environment where high debt levels are worked off and asset prices generally correct lower. That is, all of this government intervention is still failing to overcome the deflationary forces at work and this economy could get very interesting over the coming 12 months as government intervention slowly ends and deflationary forces reassert themselves. Of course, it’s important to note that I don’t believe the government can simply print our way out of a downturn, but understanding actual monetary operations and the effects of government intervention is vital in knowing how assets will perform should the markets take another dip. Avoiding paper assets in this environment due to a flawed understanding of fiat currencies will be detrimental to your portfolio’s performance. After all, this is not an inflationary environment my friends. Not even close. Allocate properly.



Is there any doubt that deflation is the bigger risk? After all, commodities wouldn’t be tanking along with everything else if investors were scared of inflation.
I believe that part of this increase in money supply is not simply sitting in the bank vaults but have been used to prop up the markets. Obviously not enough to create an inflationary environment because of the huge deflationary forces that you are mentioning, but it does not mean that you have to discard this scenario altogether because suddenly the USD is getting stronger in the last few weeks. Besides most of the “inflationistas” (funny word btw!) have been recommending buying commodities for years, and they have been dead on. It’s not because some of them had a poor 2008 return that they did not perform well in the last 10 years or so…
I think that is TPC’s point though. These people who have been predicting inflation and telling everyone to buy commodities have not been right bc there is inflation. There is just improving demand for commodities from investment managers and emerging markets. It hasn’t been a mass move to shield from inflation pressures. Am I wrong TPC? Don’t want to put words in your mouth.
Yes correct this is not a mass move to shield from inflation per se, there is obviously a much higher demand from emerging markets and especially BRIC economies but predicting this huge increase in demand which will increase the costs of raw materials, food and energy isn’t it seeing inflation along the way? Now it’s true that most of the inflationistas are seeing huge inflation (or hyperinflation) coming because they think that the dollar will be crushed at some point in the future, and they obviously underestimated the deflationary forces. I’ve been living in Japan for 14 years and there is little or no inflation since then, and the JPY never got crushed even after all the years of QE…
In essence, yes. The classic argument is “but gold is holding up!”. Well, this is due to two things:
1) Most people have this very misinformed belief that gold is a currency. It is not and it never will be. Therefore, it is not a true currency hedge unless we somehow devolve into the stone age again. Not happening. Fiat and electronic money is here to stay. Get over it.
2) The fundies in gold are VERY good. Just as they are in most commodities.
TPC,
The gold argument is not ENTIRELY accurate. First of all, it has very little commercial value and in a deep global recession, demand wouldn’t be picking up at the consumer level. It is sort of an inflationary hedge to some degree, but not a very good one. In an inflationary environment, you’d be much better off in equity indexes or consumable commodities than gold.
Second of all, Gold DOES trade as a currency – I know because we do these swaps all day long and I personally perform our bullion PnL. It’s a strange sort of derivative instrument that is a blend of the commodity and the currency it’s denominated in (then converted to a baseline currency for PnL). The is in fact very little physical gold trading beyond the consumer/retail level and some minor industrial use.
As for inflation, well like you said, you can’t cherry pick time horizons. Oil hit $25bbl in March 09 and recently touched up at $85+ bbl. This has been in the face of burgeoning supply and very weak demand with no change in output from OPEC. Now you are correct that on a slightly longer time line, we are still in a heavily deflationary environment. However, inflationary pressures can very easily flow through from monetary money creation directly into oil derivatives. Additionally, one must have an astute understanding of the global oil derivatives market and the pricing of such in dollars (ie. petrodollars). This was the sole reason that oil hit its high of $150 in the summer of 2008. As massive liquidity injections hit the market, OPEC nations producing oil actually were funneling their USDs right back into the derivative market and driving it sky high. However, this is again a fairly small physical market and when demand started dropping off a cliff, the rush to the exit was unbelievable with oil prices clipping up to 25% in one day!
Regardless, the truth is that real inflation takes sometime to flow to the consumer. Producers don’t necessarily raise prices on existing inventory and if inventory isn’t moving, then the consumer doesn’t feel it. However, where inventory is in constant consumption (food/energy) the effects are immediately apparent and these were the increases recently seen in CPI.
With the market contracting again and deflation taking hold (and people hopefully coming to their senses), you will definitely see a drop in most commodity prices – because most are traded in dollars and since dollars are more “valuable”, the dollar denominated value of the commodity must decrease in lockstep.
Either way, I sold my oil for a nice profit weeks ago, went to cash and then shortly there after went short. We both felt that squeeze machine for awhile but I can’t say I’ve executed many trades before that were as lucrative as this one.
PS I love feeding out my puts, 1 contract at a time. Cha-CHING!
Anyone wondering about why there is a rise in food prices should go to real news.com and watch the video about the coming food price inflation. According to the video it’s all about financial speculation. I think that probable holds true for all commodities.
Are you talking about that instant ice tea mix crap? Your better than that TPC…
I’ve been arguing w/ my colleagues for a while now that rates will head lower, like Japan, b/c of this deflationary scenario. We do have inflation in money supply but it is offsetting bad bets as well as debts. With the exception of metals and lumber, commodities have not gotten out of hand yet. Look at the softs and natty gas; they are not all blowing out to the upside. We are still seeing real wage deflation in the US which is the ultimate driver of prices. The food thing is a mystery to me, but I still see rates low for a while. Tough to be a bond trader right now.
Metals, lumber, oil, power, ags – that’s a solid chunk.
Natty gas is a whole other story – this is the American tragedy. Look at Chesapeake energy – they extracted so much of this stuff that they lost billions in 09 and almost had to cut off operations as they had no storage space left (which is incredibly expensive).
This is one of the worst travesties around. We have readily available technology to utilize this resource that we have an abundant supply of yet its just sitting there. I expect some legislation to change this in the near future however (ie. Trucking and Shipping will have to change from Diesel to Nat Gas in the next 10 years).
Call it whatever you want –inflation or deflation. Either way, gold is holding up even the last few days while the dollar is up strong.
Is it just me or does that “smell” like something?
its not just you…..if gold is flat while dollar goes up 3% in a week…..livin in the US my gold has gone up 3%….at least on some level
This won’t be a popular comment, but again, I truly believe gold is the currency of the fear mongerer – the person who truly believes fiat will cease to exist and one day we will revert back to the gold standard. Sorry, but this will never happen. It has been tried. The single currency system is failing miserably in Europe as we speak. The gold standard is no different.
Gold is holding up because it is incorrectly viewed as a currency hedge. I don’t discount that view as I know most people hold so I would expect gold to perform decently – especially if the EMU fails and the fear mongerers all come out of their caves with clubs in hand and begin talking about the end of fiat money….
It doesn’t require a disaster, or a new gold standard, to make gold more valuable. More money printing &/or threat of debt repudiation will do just fine.
Undoubtedly, you employ better & more sophisticated ways to hedge against these global competitive devaluations but PMs are one that I feel like I understand & don’t have to monitor /manage on a minute-to-minute basis.
So far this week, we both (dollars/T-bonds & gold) winning. Time will tell if one is substantially better than the other.
Have you written on an article on what you believe to be the next monetary system that will replace Bretton Woods II, however long it takes?
You can see my thoughts on the gold standard here:
http://pragcap.com/reflections-on-gold-as-an-asset-class
I firmly believe each sovereign nation should have its own currency. The single currency system has been tried (as has multiple currency boards) and they always fail or evolve to a full free floating exchange.
The only way a single currency would work is in a world with one government. Maybe that’s something for us to aspire to?
In 10,000 years? It would solve a lot of problems actually.
So you’re proposing to not even implement a reserve currency, such as the SDR, after the dollar standard is gone? Just let the FX markets and the respective governments choose a de facto standard?
From the article it is clear that you recognize the risk of the dollar standard, “This is not to imply that the U.S. dollar can’t fail or that the fiat currency system will always exist in its current form”, but you recognize that governments won’t fall back on the gold standard. Just curious…
You can’t have a global reserve currency – TPC is absolutely correct on this one. The reason being that it would be weighted and thus would essentially be very similar to the dollar, except not backed by the US. Besides, everyone would have to agree on a single monetary policy – something we can barely accomplish at the state level in the US (and which most people don’t even grasp).
i don’t believe we go back to a gold standard either. i just believe in a coming currency crisis as the result of all that is happening and has been gone over here ad infinitum.
it is not fear mongering for me but just the next bubble.i did 100% in the tech bubble n got out….
did 200% in the real estate bubble,did 50% in paper since march a year ago. completely out monday this week.
most people do not WANT to like gold because of what it means when it goes up……bad things for everything else….usually very bad…..very bad is what i believe we are headed to for all this bailout paper(button pushing.)
i absolutly wish gold wasn’t the next bubble…..but it is.
i am disspassionate when it comes to investing,as much as a human being can be….i have to be.
1. yes, the market for private credit is contracting, but the market for public credit (i.e. govt debt) is expanding. the net result is inflationary. if the bailouts stop, that may change.
2. more importantly, this situation is not new. an economy with a fiat currency and debt levels that cannot be repaid have historically resulted in currency crises. argentina in 2001, the euro in 2009, the US dollar in…..
3. a deflationary spiral was forecasted in the 1990 recession; didn’t happen. then it was forecasted after the dot com bubble; didn’t happen. the bottom line is that under current monetary policy, a determined central bank can inflate. the psychology of the fed is critical here. they are very much inflationists.
4. inflation is happening. higher energy prices, higher gold prices, smaller packages at the same price, substituting low quality goods for high quality goods (while keeping prices the same) are all happening — and are all signs of inflation.
You had me until you compared USA with Argentina and Europe. TOTALLY different currency systems. Argentina was pegged. Europe is on a single currency that gives no nation sovereign control of money issuance.
What about RECORD HIGHS ISM PRICES PAID in MANUFACTURING ( AND NON MANUFACTURING SECTORS?
Let’s see it in the real economy.
Is it fair to lump the Austrians and Monetarists together in the inflationist camp? Monetarists belong there but the Austrians understand the uses of credit expansion and contraction on the money supply in circulation as opposed to bank reserves. Just take a look at Mish’s blog for an example.
Agreed, the Austrians do have a better handle on understanding this as a part of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory.
It’s also worth pointing out that the Austrians’ definition of inflation as the expansion of the supply of money and credit, not price inflation used everywhere else. At this point, the Austrians are waiting and looking for how the inflation manifests itself, both in the United States and overseas. For example, Jerry O’Driscoll says:
http://austrianeconomists.typepad.com/weblog/2009/11/wheres-that-inflation.html
Careful what you read guys. Any Austrian who believes the US can go bankrupt or that we should go back to the gold standard has a relatively misguided understanding of monetary operations.
Mish nails the deflationary debate. Unfortunately, he gets a lot of the rest of the actual workings of monetary operations entirely wrong. Still love his site though. Just be careful with the gold standard rants….
You keep saying “gold standard”. That’s not at all what the Austrians tout as that takes away the market price for gold and in place puts someone in charge of setting a price. A gold backed currency is what is being called for b/c it lets the market set the price for gold.
G standard, convertible commodity system, whatever you want to call it. They’re all equally horrible and history has proven this.
Not many have been saying inflation and US bankruptcy were imminent, just that they were impossible to avoid in the future. I think that’s still true, because the velocity will come. I’ve argued that we’ve gotten a form of stealth inflation from China using dollars to buy hard commodities rather than reinvesting which would muzzle velocity. I don’t think anyone is counting that money which normally gets locked up in new US investments. The error TPC makes, IMO, is taking far too short term a view on this. You can have deflation before inflation kicks in. And FWIW, I don’t see the bad in deflation like a lot of people do – inflation is FAR worse IMO.
True, we could one day get inflation. But my research shows that the consumer will be saddled with high debt for at least two more years. Private sector debt remains too high. If the economy remains fairly weak, which I expect, there is no chance of inflation in the next two years. 5-10 years out? Maybe. But I’ll revisit that as it comes.
I agree 100%
Without Velocity of money there can be no inflation. In the U.S. the low velocity of money appears to be due to bank hording in addition to a new but growing consumer attitude toward more savings. In Japan, the low velocity of money started as bank hording and is also supported by a high consumer savings rate. Historically, deflation changes the consumer spending mindset to one of putting off new buying because products will be cheaper later. Product prices continue to fall to compete for consumer dollar (or yen in this case). That is the deflationary spiral that central bankers are powerless to fight.
The bottom line; if simply printing money caused inflation, Japan would by hyper by now. Great piece!
Thanks Matt.
TPC has it right – we are in a post-bubble credit contraction that brings deflationary impulses.
The private sector cannot absorb new debt onto their balance sheets, thus the monetary policy linkage is broken. The Fed only faciliates the expansion of credit through interest rate policy (and QE), they cannot expand the money supply without cooperation from borrowers/lenders. Moreover, I think their is compelling evidence that banks are under reserved for credit losses, and have been boosting earnings through accounting tricks, i.e. marking up toxic assets and decreasing loss reserves.
Commodity price increases are not inflationary, but are akin to a rise in real rates of interest. Wealth effects trump price effects – that is, without an increase in income, the commodity price increase rearranges the pie of disposable income but does not promote inflation generally. More than likely, sharp increases in inelastic commodities, e.g. oil, suppress economic activity, and this utlimately results in disinflation.
Yessir!
in the long run, when the piper gets paid, we will need wheelbarrows.
but not until.
I think the “inflationistas” are concerned about a sudden explosion in inflation. But TPC, they are no different then you saying the “V-shaped S&P optimists” are wrong in the last few months … until you are proven right. The inflationistas argue that there is a **potential** powderkeg. I think we can agree that the powderkeg is there, but we may not agree with them that it can be mitigated. One example is Greece: it is likely they will implode deflationarily, then explode (and I don’t mean in a good way) inflationarily [these might even be real words!]. I think you always have the potential for both in a highly nonlinear Ponzi fiat money scheme.
Give me a V in the unemployment rate and I will 100% admit I am wrong. 82 was a V. 92 was a V. This is a U at best.
I have no idea how anyone can even fathom calling this a V-shaped recovery when the unemployment rate is barely shy of a two decade high!
BTW I wasn’t saying you are wrong in the non-V call, just using it as an example. Sometimes things are counterintuitive, and the inflationistas haven’t been proven wrong. My recollection of the late 70′s, early 80′s was very poor non-union wage increases (or at least my experience!) and spiralling inflation. Conversely, in the gogo 90′s-00′s all the “inflation” was concentrated in selective, rotating assets … commodities & services was deflation. I would have never predicted either … of course I wasn’t reading TPC back then!
???
The 51 bp decline in the 10-year treasury yield in just over a month is a pretty clear signal that the markets, i.e. those who actually put their money where their mouths are, are not particularly worried about US inflation.
For all of its flaws, the US remains the preferred place to run and hide when money gets scared. The Austrians are overrepresented on internet blogs, but they clearly aren’t in touch with market sentiment, while pure Chicago School monetarism has been well debunked. It should be abundantly clear that inflation is not strictly a monetary phenomenon, and that the primary driver of inflation — wage growth — is not much of a threat while unemployment is 9-10%.
That being said, the budget deficit does pose a long-term challenge, although there is hope if we finally abandon supply-side economics in favor of better fiscal management during boom times. The question is one of political will, and it is fair to ask whether we will have it when we need it.
Dead on.
good article, could’nt agree more. I hold and earn US$ while living in Canada, I only convert what I need to Can$ , everything else stay’s US$ while all I hear is the US$ is going to devalue to nothing, if it does than all currency’s are screwed, are they not? and we had better get guns.
We just had inflation did we not? Quite large actually real estate trippled in some area’s, stock market at 14000. Now the fed as been fighting the deflation for 2 years, they’ll be fighting a while longer to, business are not borrowing, consumers are not borrowing, all the consuming as been done and then some(debt)
I’ll be keeping my US$’s for now and looking for the continuing decline in assets, especially up here in Canada. This year put the real estate market back to the levels they were in 07/08! Thanks to China’s currency/commodatie hedge buying,inflation came back here. Could be a sharp fall, if China’s loan tighting continues, it’s of the rader right now with europe, but Shanghai as been fallig large lately, plus copper stock piles are growing in china while prices drop..any thoughts on China here TPC? with all the news focusing on Europe
FREEFALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLlll
1933 we are here
For what it is worth…..
I am not a trader, just an overly enthusiastic average Jane arm chair economist. However, it appears to me that there are two definitions for inflation: 1)a technical version “many dollars chasing too few goods” and 2) a layman’s term “increase in prices.”
In the technical classroom definition of inflation, the effects may be relatively small. I would even argue deflationary with regards to houses. However, I do not live in the classroom and I do not purchase a home every day. I live in the real world where it cost $40 for my family of four to eat out. I have said before, we are most certainly witnessing an increase in inflation in the layman’s terms…food, utilities & fuel increasing constantly. Just go buy something. I also have a very hard time believing that the taxes that I owe (will owe) are experiencing a deflationary cycle…increase in sales tax or new VAT tax causes an increase in the price of the stuff that I purchase…thus inflation.
As for gold, I would happily accept gold as payment for my business services and have even thought of putting a sign in the office to that effect. Thus far in my life, you could buy a car for $3,000, now they are $30,000. We paid $42,000 for our first home and sold it for $169,000. I don’t consider myself a gold bug or doomsdayer, but if gold increases by a multiple of ten or four like a new car or my old house, I would consider myself to be a pretty savvy investor….even if it takes 20-30 years. It beats getting ripped off by brokers & the government. Then I would only have one thief to worry about and that is the petty thief.
I just want to keep what I earn and pass a little on to my children, but it is real hard to do that when inflation is 2.7% and my CD rate is 1.5% OR some financial planner is sucking out 2% or 3% on a loosing portfolio.
I think it all depends on your perspective.
“I truly believe gold is the currency of the fear mongerer – the person who truly believes fiat will cease to exist and one day we will revert back to the gold standart”
no paper currency survived a longer timeframe except USD. anyway, you can just take look on value of USD and gold over longer timeframe – it make no sense to hold it as store of value for….i would rather own gold or oil then depreciating paper
TPC: You are 100% in the money! deflation is coming BIG time as another chunk of faked demand has dissapeared with the dead of the EU Ponzi.
The EU Soverign debt Ponzi game is up. The world has come to realize that another chunk of pseudo-demand has evaporated! And pseudo-GDP evaporation will follow. I will explain.
Just like subprime in the US, the purchasing power for the PIIGS and other lesser countries who consume more than they produce, was possible by making up the difference with borrowed money.
Greece, Spain, Portugal ad other lesser countries within and without the EU are dead zombies. They will never make enough money to pay their debts and have a money leftover from a positive GDP to help its citizens. In theory, thanks to the great potential of the US economic engine, the US will recover and its citizens will produce REAL incomes linked to real GDP, tax its citizens and pay its debts but even that may be brought into question.
I see two issues: The economic calamity. A big chunk of the EU GDP was a mirage. Even in Germany, as a good chunk of its GDP was exports to EU countries which were just acquiring euro debt. Just as it was the case with the Chinese and the US. So the world economy will suffer greatly because the demand generated with borrowed money has evaporated and this includes people in the US as well as people in Greece, Spain, Portugal, Ireland etc. So to whom are the Asian countries and Germany sell all their GDP generating junk?
The other issue is the renewed financial crisis that will ensue as banks take another HUGE hit… Another trillion [Euro this time] black-hole.
it looks very ugly.
The use of Japan as an example is a terrible one.
Japan was until very recently a positive trade balance of payments nation. This extra foreign currency allowed Japan to largely decouple its weak yen/low interest rate policy with incoming import prices. Throw in the majority of Japan’s population’s savings being in the Japan Postal Bank, as well as said population’s acquiescence to low interest rates, and you have a nearly 2 decade long mild deflationry span.
The US doesn’t have a positive trade balance. Nor does the US have a population which puts the majority of its money in Treasuries. The US does have a global reserve currency – it is this which has been the sovereign ‘credit card’ allowing increasing indebtness.
Nowhere in this article nor ensuing discussion is the funding issue addressed: several trillion dollars in US Treasuries will need to be sold in the next 18 months.
The foreigners aren’t buying nearly enough.
So how again will both low interest rates and a strong dollar continue?
You can only put so much lipstick on this pig. And I don’t mean PIIGS.
I agree that the money has been given to the banks but they have bought 10 and 20 year Treasury bonds, for the interest received. This action is effective in monetizing our debt and supporting the value of the dollar. This action by big banks is what one would expect as they compose the Federal Reserve and its actions. I wonder who will control the bricks and mortar assets when this manipulation of the free market ends?