Home » Most Recent Stories

BERNANKE’S GREAT MONETARIST GAFFE

26 May 2010 by Cullen Roche 41 Comments

I had to chuckle at the headline on Yahoo Finance throughout much of Monday’s trading session:

It’s an accurate headline.  Mortgage rates have declined in recent weeks as U.S. government bonds have surged.  But the actual article was filled with very dramatic certainties (most of which were inaccurate and/or misleading).  For instance, the excellent Mark Zandi of Moody’s was quoted saying that we are seeing a once in a generation buying opportunity in real estate:

“It’s the best time in our generation to buy.  It may be the best time in any generation. Mortgage rates are so low and with homes prices down and lots of inventory, you couldn’t pick a better time to buy or re-finance.”

Wow, sounds like we should all go out and buy houses, right?  It gets rosier though.  The article details why we should all run out and buy houses immediately:

But the decline in rates probably won’t last long, analysts say. So homeowners need to move fast.

“I think they won’t last much longer than a month or two at the best,” says Lawrence Yun, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors. “I can see them going up to 5.5 percent by the end of June if not sooner.”

Move fast, huh?  Prices are low.  Rates are going back up.  That sounds pretty convincing.  If interest rates (and home prices) are only going to be low for a brief period then we should capitalize on that opportunity.  Right?   But then the article takes a dramatic turn for the worst when they try to explain the actual fundamentals behind the rising interest rate argument:

“The US is fortunate now that there’s no pressure on interest rates,” Yun goes on to say. “But going forward, higher rates will be needed for financing the debt.”

(Screeching sound).   Uh oh.  Here we go again with the hyperinflation, the USA is dying, the dollar is finished, higher interest rates will be needed to “finance our debt”, argument.  The dots are easy to connect in this article.  In essence, the article implies that interest rates are at record lows because investors have sought the safety of government bonds and mortgage rates have subsequently declined.  What they fail to expand on is why interest rates have been declining in recent weeks when, according to this article, you might think they’d be rising.  After all, we do have to “fund” that deficit right?  If sovereign debt fears were expanding then surely the United States would be culprit # 1, right?

The problem is we’ve been hearing about low interest rates for years now.  Long-term government bonds have been between 2% and 4.3% for the past 2 years.   And mortgage rates have been beneath 5.5% for most of the last decade – “record lows!”.   Meanwhile, we’ve been running budget deficits for most of the last 50 years.  Of course, this is all sounding very familiar.  In the 90′s Japan suffered the exact same scenario.  High budget deficits, crushing deflation, tumbling government bond yields, “record low interest rates” AND tumbling real estate prices:

10 Year JGB

Japanese Real Estate Prices

Interest rates in Japan declined throughout the entirety of the 90′s and remained very low throughout all of the 2000′s as deflation continued to be the primary economic risk.  No amount of pump priming, quantitative easing, interest rate tinkering or stimulus was enough to offset the supply/demand imbalance in the real estate market.  What was the overriding similarity between Japan and the United States?  MASSIVE private sector debt levels.

As we’ve mentioned before, no bond vigilantes came after Japan despite record high budget deficits and fear mongering over government bankruptcy.  Of course, bankruptcy is impossible in a nation who is the monopoly supplier of currency in a floating exchange rate system.  That is why Japan has never confronted these evil “bond vigilantes”.  But enough about that – we’ve beat this dead horse plenty in recent months.  There is a much more important phenomenon occurring here which the economics textbooks don’t teach us about.  And that is that monetary policy is ineffective when the private sector is paying down debt.  If there is no demand for borrowing it doesn’t matter what interest rates are at.

This is the monetarist gaffe that Ben Bernanke now finds himself in.  Like his predecessor, Bernanke believes he controls the world with the issuance of a press release on interest rates.  But he is pushing on a string (and I don’t even think he realizes it!).  Interest rate policy has had almost zero impact on the real economy (although it’s certainly helping boost bank profits!).  It’s classic Japan syndrome.  Low interest rates are having almost no impact on the economy because the private sector continues to de-leverage.  Without borrowing the excess reserves are just sitting at the banks unused.  It’s trickle down economics at its absolute least effective.

The equation has been and remains simple – as long as private sector debt levels remain high Ben and Co. will continue pushing on a string.  There is no inflation and there is no reflation on Main Street.  Monetary policy is useless during a balance sheet recession.

Make no mistake – we are Japan.  Unfortunately, we have implemented many of the same remedies implemented in Japan at the time (though admittedly a bit faster).  Lower interest rates are not a solution in the current environment.  Lower interest rates are not a reason to run out and purchase a home.  This is not a once in a lifetime buying opportunity in real estate.  This has been and continues to be an environment where consumers and corporations need to repair their balance sheets.  The United States is not going to suffer higher interest rates when the bond market wakes up one day and sends a platoon of “vigilantes” to attack the Federal Reserve.  The message here is not to be fooled by the low interest rate environment – it is merely a sign of the times and not a “once in a lifetime opportunity”.

It’s so vitally important that both the private sector AND public sector properly diagnose this crisis.  We have misdiagnosed it for well over two years thanks in large part to a Federal Reserve Chairman who was convinced that Milton Friedman had handed him the playbook for success.   If you’re wondering why we have seen almost no recovery on Main Street then you need look no further than the policies of Bernanke & Co.

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
  • PLT

    Doesn’t Japan have an extremely high-saving population that is willing to buy their debt? Isn’t that a little bit different from the U.S., where we are more dependent on foreign investment? And besides, don’t many observers agree that Japan is an accident just waiting to happen? Is that where we want to go?

    • buckstar

      When people no longer feel like buying treasuries, the Fed will buy them through a variety of means, including giving banks free money to buy treasures as is happening now….

    • Cullen Roche TPC

      The more important question is why will anyone stop buying our bonds? Japan is a mess, but the people saying they are bankrupt and on the verge of an epic collapse are misinterpreting the monetary system in Japan. This fear mongering has been going on in Japan for 20 years….Granted, it’s a big mess over there, but bankruptcy or insolvency is not in the cards. They are certainly not the next Greece….

      • Gonzalito

        TPC,

        I think the previous poster made a good point and I am eager to hear your answer.

        Does it make any difference to you that Japan is relying on DOMESTIC demand for bond vs. US relying on FOREIGN(China/Japan) demand?

        Thanks

        • Cullen Roche TPC

          I don’t think it really matters. Those dollars will flow back into some form of US asset. Who cares if Jim from Iowa holds the dollars or if Izumi from Japan holds them?

          • PLT

            My question had to do with where the bid for treasuries would have to come from. If the resident population buys them as almost a cultural matter, then the interest rates might stay low from that demand. If foreign investors have to buy them to keep interest rates low, that would seem to me to be more problematic. Sure, the Fed could step in and buy them to keep interest rates low, but what if the selling pressure was high? How much might the Fed have to buy? Is that sustainable?

            Of course, we could trash the dollar by issuing more dollars to pay for the treasuries/deficit. However, it seems to me that there is not much difference between an outright partial debt default and a devaluation of the currency by, say, 30%. In either case it will be more expensive to borrow in the future. In either case we will be paying off debt at less than full value. In either case it will be politically easier to do if our national creditors are foreign, rather than domestic entities.

            Maybe I misunderstand your position, but it seems to me that there is a whiff of “it is different this time” in your position, and you think we can do certain things since they worked for Japan, which has made it through their years of QE. We are not Japan, and the next two decades won’t be at all the same as the last two decades, so it seems to me we can’t rely on the Japanese example. Even if we could, we don’t know yet how the Japanese story is going to end, so following their game plan might be a nightmare. I have a lot of respect for your thoughts, and am interested to hear your response.

            • Cullen Roche TPC

              I think you’re misinterpreting the endogenous act of govt bond purchases. There is a great myth out there that “quantitative easing” will expand the money supply, but QE is just an asset swap – buying bonds in exchange for deposits.

              QE in the US has done nothing because there is no demand for loans. Excess reserves just sit on bank balance sheets and do nothing. It is not inflationary.

      • RSDallas

        So what happens if Japans citizens stop buying their governments bonds? Do they crank up the press?

        • Cullen Roche TPC

          Will they stop buying is the more important question? I see no reason why. Savers will continue to seek a safe return on their money. In Japan, that means buying Yen denominated JGBs.

          • PLT

            But as the Japanese begin to retire, they will be selling, rather than buying, debt.

            • Cullen Roche TPC

              Will they? Why? The older you get the more stable income you desire. Would the citizens of Japan really prefer 0% cash under mattress to 1% notes?

              Japan has had no problem “funding” its deficit. The money is endogenous – always seeking a higher return.

          • RSDallas

            I know. You know TPC I just have an eerie feeling that around the world people will not “stop” buying the bonds, but rather reduce their purchases of the bonds. This is what I fear is capable of being the catalyst that changes the perceptions that the bond holder has. And then what? Look out below!

            I feel that the players in this huge debt creation/rollover game believe that the game was designed in such a manner that it can’t end. It’s kind of like that play where the little Venus fly trap grows and grows and grows and always says feed me, feed me, feed me. Finally the plant gets so big that it explodes.

            • Cullen Roche TPC

              Well, this is the end of humanity scenario. If demand for paper assets ceases then we all better hope we have LOTS of guns.

              None of us will care about bond markets in this scenario. I just don’t see it.

              Humans are unstable, but not THAT unstable. Cooler heads would prevail ultimately.

              • RSDallas

                Please don’t interrupt game ending as the end of the world. I’m not in that camp. I am in that camp that thinks we are going to experience a fairly substantial global developed market “Re-set”. Henceforth, the deflation is not going away. Let’s just hope this doesn’t morph into stagflation.

                I really think this the Fed is desperately trying to avoid. The thing is he can’t avoid it this time. Well actually he probably could pull it off if the US Government forgave all debtors, which would be a political disaster.

                • Cullen Roche TPC

                  Yes, wasn’t putting words in your mouth. I am just saying that there would have to be a global revolt against paper in order for demand for such a scenario to unfold.

      • Jon

        TPC,

        This is like asking.. why would anyone stop buying and flipping houses?

        Supply and demand brother.. the free market always wins- as I think you know..

        but you seem not to recognize that there exists a market in money, like any other good, which has been horribly manipulated by governments (not unlike housing). But, the free market always wins in any market, including money. So, what is the free market solution to money?

  • BK

    TPC,
    I know I have lavished you with praise before, so I won’t do it again. Great article.

    But I have a follow up question – given the private sector is massively deleveraging, what is the solution then to this crisis? You may written about this before, so sorry if this is a repitition of an earlier piece. Do they have to be more ruthless with the bad assets sitting on US bank balance sheets?

    Another questions – do you happen to know the breakdown of who is buying US Govt Debt? Obviously China is but the private sector is presumably also piling into govt bonds.

    The way I see it is that all the banks should be nationalised, haircuts taken on all toxic assets, recapitalized, and then re-privatised. Deleveraging will happen in a quarter of the time (albeit will be a harrowing experience in the short-term)and then your 2012 target of becoming bullish may be achieveable (I think you should get that timeline out to 2014-15 at the earliest!)

    Thanks again, and and if you ever get a chance to post something on Australia, then give me a shout. I’m not sure if you’ve read about Aussie house prices or Aussie private debt levels in your past endeavours – but you would have a field day if you did.

    • Cullen Roche TPC

      BK,

      That was part of my solution back in 2008 (which I mailed to the Fed). Bernanke ignored it in favor of his silly trickle down solution which has failed miserably. He assumed that banks are reserve constrained and that trickle down would work in the banking sector. It hasn’t.

      Unfortunately, we’ve tried to save all the banks which is similar to what Japan did when they merged all their banks. Thus, we’ve chosen a “workout” period as opposed to taking our medicine. Therefore, the debt just lingers and continues to nip at our heels. We’d be better off in the long-run if we forced some of the losers to lose, but that’s clearly not happening. I’m not against well targeted govt spending either, but we’ve basically dropped the ball on that one as well. The stimulus has been nothing more than a short-term painkiller for a long-term problem. And now everyone is convinced that we need to cut budgets, fire teachers and firefighters and bring in the deficit or else we’ll go bankrupt. The last 24 months has been politicians at their worst…..What a waste.

      As for Australia – you’re right. You guys have potentially bigger problems than we do! But I try not to steal my colleague’s thunder. Rohan at Data Diary has done some superb work on the Aussie economy. I highly recommend his site: http://www.datadiary.com.au/

      Thanks for the nice comment!

  • apj

    I thought I read something recently to the effect that PG actually WAS an Aussie….but I may be wrong.

    My guess is that he’s going to answer your question with a distinct focus on fiscal policy, given monetary policy has the brewer’s droop about it (in a private sector demand contraction, the public sector must take up the slack….unless it wants a wrenching recession – or a a worse one – that is). But I won’t steal his thunder….

    • Cullen Roche TPC

      Not to disappoint, but I am American. Lo siento. But there are times when I wish I was an Aussie. There is much to envy….

      Koo’s solution is pure fiscal policy, but I think it needs to be more combined with a bit of Austrian economics as well. The losers must lose. Capitalism must work its natural course. Otherwise, we create terrible precedents and only prolong problems. A workout period clearly doesn’t work. Japan is evidence of this. I think a targeted fiscal policy with a wake up call for the banks would have been appropriate. This is really just the tip of the iceberg though. The problems in the US economy run deeper than just adding stimulus and killing off some banks, but that’s for another story….

      • Iluvatar

        Would love to hear the end of THAT story – my comments/questions follow below….

  • Adam

    Very useful. Where would you put the UK in all this? We’ve got rising inflation (although likely to fall back) and our property market seems to have held up, albeit at very low transaction volumes)…

    • Cullen Roche TPC

      I’m not an expert on the UK so I’d have to dig a little deeper into the housing and inflation problem there before I could really open my mouth. Sorry.

  • asha101

    I don’t think it’s good time to buy houses, but the US real estate market today is definitely very different from the market of Japan in early 90s if you compare the price. Even at the peak in 2008, most houses in US still has a rent-buy ratio over 3% and the price to average household income below 5.

    I don’t have the detailed stats for Japan, but I believe what the Chinese market today is probably similar to the Japanese market in late 80s. Last time I checked,
    the average household income in BeiJing is around 100,000 Yuan
    An average house in BeiJing costs about 1.7 million Yuan
    Average rent to buy ratio is less than 1.5%

    The place where US fell off is nothing compared to where Japan fell off.

  • Mark

    Great article as always.

    I was trying to understand why large federal deficits matter. Specifically in such an environment such as this, if a federal stimulus were targeted directly at the consumer and if it were to improve the balance sheet of the consumer, would it not avoid deflation and improve debt/gdp ratio over time. Is it because of the risk of runaway inflation. Is there a particular level of federal deficit where you cannot pursue such measures?

    Also, couldn’t you argue that in 2003, we pursued a tactic of punishing the losers (tech companies) and stimulus?

    • Cullen Roche TPC

      This question is deserving of a full article….

    • RSDallas

      Improve the consumer’s balance sheet with my tax dollars? I don’t think so. Many and Most of those people shouldn’t have gotten themselves into the mess they are in. What we should do is speed up the foreclosure process on individuals and companies and most importantly insovent banks and sell the assets. This would allow us to have a National bank sale. This would be sale that all financially sound banking institutions could participate in. Just think of it. All of the financial institutions that ran their business conservatively and profitably before during and after this crisis would be able to bid on the assets of these insolvent, hazardous and crooked banking institutions. It would be a site to see my friends. Maybe that lady in the Progressive Insurance TV ad could facilitate the sale!

  • John

    Rates are low, but prices are dipping too, never mind that they are overvalued compared to the historical trend. Hyperbole indeed.

  • B Ferro

    TPC you ever read the 2002 (I think) Bernanke speech from a Friedman commemoration ceremony?

    It provides a wonderful view into how he views deflation and how he would combat it; and this was well before deflation became an issue

    Effectively, his conclusion was that Japan’s inability to fight off deflation despite money printing does not prove that money printing has been unsuccessful there; instead, he attributes Japanese deflation to a lack of political consistency across administrations whereby stimulus would be apply and then pulled later on…

  • Vick

    A question then..What about raising interest rates and rewarding savers who then have money to spend in the real economy?

  • Chris

    Really great article. I’ve been reading your site for a while and it’s taught me a lot. Thanks.

    I’m a total newbie in economics, but isn’t the fact that the Dollar is the world’s reserve currency a key reason why US debt will find a market of willing buyers? Clearly, it helps when other sovereign debt issuers are perceived as more risky. The US wins the bond beauty contest by most measures.

    But what is the role played by the Dollar as reserve currency? It seems to provide a critical advantage to US treasuries no matter how many trillions are floating around out there and that is why foreigners will keep buying US debt.

    The question that occurs to me is: can you imagine a scenario where the Dollar loses its reserve currency status aside from profligate spending and massive debt build-up and continuing recession, etc? This might be a geo-political development, for example. I recall that some countries were pondering the possibility of repricing oil in Euros a while back. That’s likely not in the cards now, but I wonder if something like that could occur. The idea of a IMF-style currency basket has also been floated to replace the dollar.

    Keep up the good work, TPC.

    • In Banking

      New reserve currency is out of the question….think of it like a much much worse Euro as you’d have even more fractured cultural divides, even more divergent Central banking policies and even less consensus. This was merely posturing if you ask me.

      Some OPEC members started accepting Euros as oil hit $150 and USD/EUR was 1.60. Looks like that worked out very well….regardless, everyone knew what was going on there – OPEC members were taking their dollars and sinking them right back into oil futures – then they got smoked as the herd tried to stampede through a dog door.

  • Nico

    The U.S., like Japan, has a huge population of diligent savers — they just aren’t Americans, and they’re not in the U.S. They are in China and Europe and Japan. They insist on making cheap stuff to trade with us for dollars, and then they stuff those dollars in their central banks (well, this is just China and Japan I’m talking about now).

    Perennial and huge trade imbalances are bad, but they are especially bad for the people of exporting countries. Those poor people work hard so importers can have an easy life and they get nothing in return — that ~$1 trillion in China’s hands? Worthless. At best they could buy 1/20th of American assets, but unless those assets perform… Not that they’ll bother. Add in inflation risk… (yeah, not today, but maybe in a decade; that trillion isn’t going anywhere, so the question of what to do with it will still be around then). Meanwhile life in China is not great.

    Consider the malinvestment that mercantilism has resulted in: China has invested enormous amounts of capital in production that Chinese citizens don’t need and for which they get little in return. Meanwhile importers have invested badly as well: in excess real estate for example (c.f., the U.S., Spain, …), and they have lost production capacity, leading to unemployment. If all these countries could form an ideal single currency zone (the way the American States do) and markets were reasonably free (but I repeat myself) then it wouldn’t be so bad: people would move where the jobs are and production would adjust more quickly to demand. But there’s zero chance of that (witness the EU). This can only lead to misery all around. One wonders at what point the Chinese people will rebel. Americans don’t like exporting manufacturing, but at least the almost-free imports make the consequences more tolerable. This modern mercantilism will die when the Chinese people decide to have better lives for themselves.

  • Nico

    I meant, of course, that China and friends shove those dollars back into the U.S. economy; what they keep in their central banks are U.S. treasuries. But you all knew that.

    Export-led recoveries are for small countries and/or short periods of time only, otherwise you get self-defeating mercantilism.

    The worst part for me is that I must come across like a protectionist :( Far from it. Trade should be mostly free as long as it’s mostly bi-directional. No people should want to become like China’s, and no country should allow itself to become the world’s import sink.

    The good news for the U.S. is that the demographic implosion bomb will be much less bad in the U.S. than elsewhere. And one lesson from the current crisis is that demographic implosion is felt much sooner than previously thought, especially when coupled with the European attitude that one need not work for even 50% of one’s life. There’s no way to save for 30-40 years of retirement having worked only 30-40 years, and governments can’t do it either if too many citizens demand that deal. It just isn’t possible, I suspect, even in the best of times.

  • Nico

    @Chris: won’t happen. The American, Indian and Brazilian economies have the best fundamentals if you look many decades into the future. The reason? Dynamic, creative cultures + babies. As such these countries will have solid currencies then. Of course, right now the U.S. has a terrible short-term outlook, and India is the best position large economy.

  • Nico

    If monetary policy is not the place to look for a solution, then what? I’m guessing that the only things to do are: wait for debt to be paid down (could be a while!) or liquidate, liquidate, liquidate. Can’t liquidate everyone though. Depositors can’t be liquidated, we know that much. And by liquidate I mean: re-negotiate debt (since that will sometimes/often pay better than fire-sales). Because the only quick way to remove the debt overhand is to make it go away. Paying it down won’t be quick, and reflating prices isn’t working and likely won’t work. I suppose another solution would be to print money directly into the hands of debtors, in the form of massive “earned” tax credits — no appetizing, but it might still be better than waiting and waiting…