BEWARE THE DOUBLE TOP
Some thoughts on the market by David Rosenberg and the potential double top forming:
I’m not sure if you all had a chance to read Dave Parkinson’s column in yesterday’s Globe & Mail (page B13 — Hibernation). When he interviewed me, he asked what it was like to be “alone.” I told him that “alone” was not the same as being “lonely” … it’s actually a comfortable place for me to be. I told Mr. Parkinson that the last time anyone asked me that was back in the fall of 2007 — actually, after a day at the Fed when I was viewed as being a nutcase for calling for a recession seeing as the S&P 500 had just hit a record high.
Indeed, the S&P 500 did hit 1,565 on October 9, 2007, a double-top after rising to 1,553 on July 19 of that year. It was a failed test, with 20/20 hindsight. That got me thinking, are double-tops danger signs? Well, have a look at what happened as the parabolic upmove ended in March 24, 2000 — the S&P 500 rallied to 1,527 and then corrected to back and do a retest of the highs on September 1 when it stalled out at 1,520.
In the cycle before that one, we saw the same thing occur in 1990 — a surge to 367.4 on June 4 followed by a brief corrective phase and then a retest of that high on July 16 (at 368.9).
The market did the exact same thing in 1987 too — a frenetic runup to the 336.8 high on August 25, a brief respite that got the bulls refreshed, and then a sudden move back above 328 on October 5 … and the rest was history. Go back to the end of the cyclical bull-run in 1980. On November 28, the S&P 500 was sitting at 140.5, it then slipped back to only then retest above 138 on January 6 … and that was all she wrote.
So what has happened this time? We hit an interim peak at 1,150 back on January 19, 2010. We had a brief corrective phase and now the S&P 500 has matched its January 19 high. In other words, we could be at an inflection point, but keep in mind that there are countless examples of the market blowing through interim highs as well. We only know in hindsight where the double-tops truly existed.
So I asked Walter Murphy (www.wminsights.com), one of my favourite technical strategists who was schooled by the likes of the legendary Bob Farrell, what clues we should be looking for to assess whether or not this is a classic double-top or just a pause that refreshes. Here is what he sent back to me:
Dave,
I usually use a “weight of the evidence” approach. I first want to find
the “internal” peak or trough and then look to find the divergences.
Most people look at breadth; so do I. But breadth oscillators are
more important than the A-D line itself. That said, breadth was way
out of character in 2000, so it wasn’t much help.In 2007, both the A-D line and oscillators did not confirm October’s
high relative to July’s high. The A-D line made new bear market lows
in 3/09, but the McClellan Summation Index & S&P’s Short Range
Oscillator (which combines both breadth and the DJIA) did not.
Momentum is another indicator to watch. The weekly Coppock
Curve peaked in early 1999 and in late 2006. It bottomed in 12/08.
Sentiment often behaves very much like momentum. The 10-week II
bull/bear bear ratio peaked in 7/99 and 2/2007 and 7/2007; it
bottomed in 12/08.I also look at the indexes — if only a few big cap indexes are making
a new high or low, that is a sign of a change. If they all do it together
that’s a sign of a trend change.Finally, I look at the Bullish Percentage Index (a P&F indicator). Like
breadth, it was out of character in 2000, but the fact is that it
peaked well before the market peak. In 2007, it peaked in Feb. It
bottomed in October 2008.So using that history, I would make the case that the internal peak
prior to 2000 was in 1999; in 2007, it occurred no later than July.
At the recent bear market low, the internal low was October 2008.
Currently, the A-D line is making new highs, but the McClellan and
SRO are not. The former peaked last September and the latter
peaked last July. Both are in uptrends, so there is still a chance that
they can challenge their earlier peaks.The weekly Coppock Curve peaked last June.
The bull/bear ratio peaked in January, so I tend to consider that a
confirmation.Virtually all of the popular indexes (except the DJIA and S&P) are
making new highs. The troops are leading the generals.
The BPI peaked in September.So, I think that, until proven otherwise, the internal peak was
recorded last summer. However, with breadth oscillators in a new
uptrend and with most averages at new highs, the divergences
aren’t full in place yet.Hope that helps,
Walter
Source: Gluskin Sheff



If Rosey is calling a double top the it’s time to pack our bags for SP 1200.
Agree. Everyone sees a double top so not likely to happen. Many other indexes have made new highs so it’s only a matter of time before the industrials catch up.
Rosenberg:
October 2009 – this is it, forming a top
December 2009 – no, this is the top
February 2010 – no really, this is the top
March 2010 – ok, ok, this is really, really it
Eventually, the house of cards will fall and he can say he called it – no offensive to his fundamental analysis
For the big short-term calls (like he is trying to make), liquidity is the prime technical indicator. There seems to be lots of it in credit. There seems to be lots of it in risk equity, although there is some momentum rotation amongst classes. Benchmarks for overvaluation in the market are modest by historical bubble standards so I don’t think we’re in a risk bubble at the moment; maybe a short-term trading bubble … but that seems to be the 2010 consensus anyways … modestly bull/bear trading range.
If investor sentiment does a 180 then the drop will be breathtaking. The new bubble is the bubble of optimism and is being blown bigger by the talking heads and Wall Street “experts”. This could continue in the near-term. The Federal Reserve continues to provide zero percent interest rates and “emergency” measures. Everyone naively assumes there are no long-term consequences to these policies, time will tell. I guess there is no consequence for fiscal/monetary stimulus that has been on the magnitude of 10x Post World War II recessions, either. Kick the can down the road seems to be the motto…..if you close your eyes and dream maybe these problems will just disappear…extend and pretend. The economic recovery is extremely weak, let’s be realistic. The stimulus will fade in the second half of this year and quantitative easing (Fed will apparently supporting mortgage market in 3 weeks) will also be in the rear-view mirror. Everyone forgets that to have healthy and sustainable growth we must de-lever. We can pretend that all of our irresponsible behavior from a leverage standpoint over the last decade will have no consequences and we can pretend like no one is going to take a loss. This can only go for so long.
In the mean time, the markets will keep their “Fast Money” trading mentality, not investing. Everyone is now a “trader”….it is the New York Stock Casino. The Boom-Bust mentality will continue. Rosenberg will be right because the market move is based on artificial measures but the timing of the market fallout is being clouded by the funny money in the system. He has missed the power of stimulus; but the benefits of stimulus are short-term in nature. The hope is that private demand will take the baton back, the evidence does not support the transition will be robust. Assets move in cycles and we have been in an above the long-term valuation using trailing earnings and smoothed out earnings since 1991, briefly going under the long-term average of around 15x in March and then rocketing back up today. Reversion to the mean is coming. There are a number of headwinds (higher taxes, higher interest rates, higher inflation, greater regulation, increasing trade barriers, ongoing credit contraction, unsustainable government debt, state and local government budget crisis, sovereign debt crisis, China’s true strength, etc.)…..that argue the case against the start of the next great bull market but right now it is easy to mistake the start of a sustainable bull market because of the Federal Reserve’s irresponsible policies. The risks are high, the timing of the risks are probably still a ways out. In the near-term we can keep the party going but as we leave the party we are going to drive off a cliff most likely.
The danger is when so many people think the good times are here and you get a shock…everyone will be running for the exits at the same time and it could get ugly.
Finally a comment with a brain behind it!!!
I side with your comment, but the cruel reality is that it is always prudent people doing right thing who will pay at last.
I AM AT THIS MOMMENT STANDING AND CLAPPING, c smith
I am still looking for a blowoff top but it will be powered from 1120 or so. A couple of days of hard fall to 1120 or so from here will probably get a lot of newbie bears excited to power the next up move. I think this up move will be the impetus for the retail longs to abandon the caution and pile in. Ride it with them but I am still looking for a final exit around May to June. retail longs won’t sell this time until it is too late again.
it seems that most people are getting bullish now…
What Rosy is identifying are Short Term Double Tops.
Short Term patterns are 50/50 at best nothing to trade or invest on.
On the Other Hand: !!
There is a Long Term Double Top in the S&P500.
The 2000 Top and the 2007 Top.
With the current rally off the Jan 2010 low we MAY be seeing the begining of a Triple Top with the S&P challenging the 1275-1300 range.
1275-1300 is about 10% from here and a reasonable possibility for the S&P for 2010. This makes sense given the stimulus.
To Rosey credit–
He is right when he says this is a techically driven market.
He is right when he says the market is 25% overvalued.
What Rosey might consider doing is identfying the 8yr pattern of Long Term Lows in the S&P500–Next Long Term Low could be due in 2011?