<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE BIG MONEY IS BULLISH WHILE SMALL MONEY IS BEARISH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/big-vs-small-inst/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/big-vs-small-inst</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guilherme Ceschiatti</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/big-vs-small-inst/comment-page-1#comment-10063</link>
		<dc:creator>Guilherme Ceschiatti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=14332#comment-10063</guid>
		<description>What is the nonreportable field in the CFTC reports? Is it composed mainly of retail traders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the nonreportable field in the CFTC reports? Is it composed mainly of retail traders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roomi</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/big-vs-small-inst/comment-page-1#comment-10018</link>
		<dc:creator>Roomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=14332#comment-10018</guid>
		<description>...opposite of big money... (typo)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;opposite of big money&#8230; (typo)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roomi</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/big-vs-small-inst/comment-page-1#comment-10017</link>
		<dc:creator>Roomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=14332#comment-10017</guid>
		<description>Well, by this indicator all the wrong market participants were consistenly long gold 2006 through 2009... And small money is opposite of long money, because, of course, total net position in market at any time adds up to exactly zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, by this indicator all the wrong market participants were consistenly long gold 2006 through 2009&#8230; And small money is opposite of long money, because, of course, total net position in market at any time adds up to exactly zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHB</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/big-vs-small-inst/comment-page-1#comment-10016</link>
		<dc:creator>SHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=14332#comment-10016</guid>
		<description>Just found your article on Commitments of Small Speculators fascinating.
I tried to set up the data so that I could follow it in the future but I am at a loss.

Which of the many COT reports have the weekly data to construct the value of the small speculators commitments??

Deeply appreciate and enjoyed the article.

SHB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found your article on Commitments of Small Speculators fascinating.<br />
I tried to set up the data so that I could follow it in the future but I am at a loss.</p>
<p>Which of the many COT reports have the weekly data to construct the value of the small speculators commitments??</p>
<p>Deeply appreciate and enjoyed the article.</p>
<p>SHB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jt26</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/big-vs-small-inst/comment-page-1#comment-9970</link>
		<dc:creator>jt26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=14332#comment-9970</guid>
		<description>BTW the standard deviation on 4 years and best-case, quarterly expiry data (sorry, just guessing) would expect, by chance, 50% +/- 25%.  Sorry, 60% is not significant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW the standard deviation on 4 years and best-case, quarterly expiry data (sorry, just guessing) would expect, by chance, 50% +/- 25%.  Sorry, 60% is not significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbrogs</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/big-vs-small-inst/comment-page-1#comment-9966</link>
		<dc:creator>bbrogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=14332#comment-9966</guid>
		<description>Sentiment Trader reports each week total $Doolar commitments of Commercials (pros)
as of last week 
C.O.T. SP500 - $COMBO  (Dec. 11th)  
PROS are s Net Short   -$15 Billion  contracts  
June &#039;09 = Pros were 2 Standard Deviation Max Long = Correct 
Nov  &#039;08 = Pros 2 std.dev. Max Short  = Correct 
April &#039;08 = Pros near 2 std.dev.Max Short = Correct 
Aug.&#039;07 =  Pros 2 std.dev.Max Long  = Wrong 
Feb.&#039;07 =  Pros near 2 std. dev. Max Short = Correct  
April &#039;06 = Pros 2 std. dev.record Max Short = Wrong 

PROS Batting average = +62.5% correct since &#039;06 
Sorry when it comes to SP500 I trust the Pros (smart money)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sentiment Trader reports each week total $Doolar commitments of Commercials (pros)<br />
as of last week<br />
C.O.T. SP500 &#8211; $COMBO  (Dec. 11th)<br />
PROS are s Net Short   -$15 Billion  contracts<br />
June &#8217;09 = Pros were 2 Standard Deviation Max Long = Correct<br />
Nov  &#8217;08 = Pros 2 std.dev. Max Short  = Correct<br />
April &#8217;08 = Pros near 2 std.dev.Max Short = Correct<br />
Aug.&#8217;07 =  Pros 2 std.dev.Max Long  = Wrong<br />
Feb.&#8217;07 =  Pros near 2 std. dev. Max Short = Correct<br />
April &#8217;06 = Pros 2 std. dev.record Max Short = Wrong </p>
<p>PROS Batting average = +62.5% correct since &#8217;06<br />
Sorry when it comes to SP500 I trust the Pros (smart money)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/big-vs-small-inst/comment-page-1#comment-9965</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=14332#comment-9965</guid>
		<description>As a short-term (weeks) indicator I would put a bit more faith in the Rydex data.  The futures data is likely a sign of a bit longer outlook (medium term - a few months)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a short-term (weeks) indicator I would put a bit more faith in the Rydex data.  The futures data is likely a sign of a bit longer outlook (medium term &#8211; a few months)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RMB</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/big-vs-small-inst/comment-page-1#comment-9964</link>
		<dc:creator>RMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=14332#comment-9964</guid>
		<description>How does this chart compare with the Rydex Bull-Bear?

The Rydex says there are many bulls and few bears. So is the Rydex truer to the big money versus small money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does this chart compare with the Rydex Bull-Bear?</p>
<p>The Rydex says there are many bulls and few bears. So is the Rydex truer to the big money versus small money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/big-vs-small-inst/comment-page-1#comment-9961</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=14332#comment-9961</guid>
		<description>This is the primary reason why the large speculators and commercial data is difficult to gauge.  Rather, it&#039;s the small specs that tend to serve as a decent market indicator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the primary reason why the large speculators and commercial data is difficult to gauge.  Rather, it&#8217;s the small specs that tend to serve as a decent market indicator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/big-vs-small-inst/comment-page-1#comment-9955</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=14332#comment-9955</guid>
		<description>With hedgies and insurance companies, or anyone playing long-short, and across asset classes  ...  Is this information useful at all ... we&#039;re potentially seeing one side/aspect of a trade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With hedgies and insurance companies, or anyone playing long-short, and across asset classes  &#8230;  Is this information useful at all &#8230; we&#8217;re potentially seeing one side/aspect of a trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

