Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

Booms & Busts are Inherent to Capitalist Systems

One common theme I read in Austrian economics is the idea that fiat money is inherently unstable because it leads to booms and busts.  Therefore, it must collapse at some point.  For instance, I was reading this piece on Mises.org which argues that the cause of the boom/bust cycle is fiat money:

“It was Ludwig von Mises who understood that a fiat money boom will, and actually must, ultimately end in a collapse of the economic system. The only open question would be whether such an outcome will be preceded by a debasement of the currency or not:

The boom cannot continue indefinitely. There are two alternatives. Either the banks continue the credit expansion without restriction and thus cause constantly mounting price increases and an ever-growing orgy of speculation, which, as in all other cases of unlimited inflation, ends in a “crack-up boom” and in a collapse of the money and credit system. Or the banks stop before this point is reached, voluntarily renounce further credit expansion and thus bring about the crisis. The depression follows in both instances.”

This strikes me as a little misleading though.  Fiat money is just a tool.  It is an accounting construct that was created as a record of account.  It does not cause booms any more than a hammer causes homes to be built.  The outcome of this tool is ultimately a function of how its users use it.  Of course, a hammer enables the building of a house, but I think it’s misleading to blame the existence of hammers if a housing boom occurs.  You would, of course, blame the people who decided to build the houses.

In a capitalist system the boom phase of the business cycle is not the result of excessive credit or excessive hammers, if you will.  It is due to the behavioral and competitive nature of a capitalist system.  The irrational users simply abuse the use of the tool at times.  And if the people within that system abuse the tools in their search for profit then we shouldn’t blame the hammers for the booms.  We should blame the people and their behavior.  And booms and busts and irrational behavior is a part of a capitalist system.  It is neither good nor bad.  It just is.

Comments are closed.