<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BULLISH SENTIMENT DROPS SUBSTANTIALLY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/bullish-sentiment-drops-substantially/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/bullish-sentiment-drops-substantially</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:23:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ike tossia</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/bullish-sentiment-drops-substantially/comment-page-1#comment-10481</link>
		<dc:creator>ike tossia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=15070#comment-10481</guid>
		<description>hey there TC
aren&#039;t  you a little worried those smoking mirrors will break ? for how much you think the shorts gonna let broker- analysts squeeze them ? you dont think that individual &quot;inwestors&quot; are on to the scheme ? for how long all those big and great companies keep issuing debt ? and why is there such big debts if there so great ? now that the days of securitizing debt are...where do you push this paper to ? was as bullish as it gets in 11/08 on financials and commodities, 01-02/09 on big tech, retailers and all the commodity producer names that just keep on getting upgraded every &quot;seconed&quot;, its great, but that feeling of midd summer 08 that soomething&#039;s just not right is back in the same way... what to do ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey there TC<br />
aren&#8217;t  you a little worried those smoking mirrors will break ? for how much you think the shorts gonna let broker- analysts squeeze them ? you dont think that individual &#8220;inwestors&#8221; are on to the scheme ? for how long all those big and great companies keep issuing debt ? and why is there such big debts if there so great ? now that the days of securitizing debt are&#8230;where do you push this paper to ? was as bullish as it gets in 11/08 on financials and commodities, 01-02/09 on big tech, retailers and all the commodity producer names that just keep on getting upgraded every &#8220;seconed&#8221;, its great, but that feeling of midd summer 08 that soomething&#8217;s just not right is back in the same way&#8230; what to do ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/bullish-sentiment-drops-substantially/comment-page-1#comment-10470</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=15070#comment-10470</guid>
		<description>Individual investors remain more bullish now than on 9/15/08, the day Lehman Brothers took a dirt nap. We all know what followed.

It is a mistake, I believe, to ponder consensus readings from perspective supposing the market remains in a bull market whose beginnings trace back to the 1974/1982 period (not that you are claiming this; I am just making a point). Such a view might suppose that, October 2007 - March 2009 was but a corrective period in the grand scheme of a larger advance. 

However, there is a lot of reason to suppose otherwise. Technical evidence suggesting the market&#039;s advance off March &#039;09 bottom is but a counter-trend rally in a larger bear market is quite conclusive. Thus, the manner in which the July-September 2008 period offers keen insight into how consensus normally thought supportive of further market advances does not bode the same in a bear market ought not be ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Individual investors remain more bullish now than on 9/15/08, the day Lehman Brothers took a dirt nap. We all know what followed.</p>
<p>It is a mistake, I believe, to ponder consensus readings from perspective supposing the market remains in a bull market whose beginnings trace back to the 1974/1982 period (not that you are claiming this; I am just making a point). Such a view might suppose that, October 2007 &#8211; March 2009 was but a corrective period in the grand scheme of a larger advance. </p>
<p>However, there is a lot of reason to suppose otherwise. Technical evidence suggesting the market&#8217;s advance off March &#8217;09 bottom is but a counter-trend rally in a larger bear market is quite conclusive. Thus, the manner in which the July-September 2008 period offers keen insight into how consensus normally thought supportive of further market advances does not bode the same in a bear market ought not be ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

