Home » Most Recent Stories

INSIDERS REMAIN DOUBTFUL OF THE RALLY

9 December 2009 by Cullen Roche 3 Comments

Few things have been more confounding over the course of the 60% rally than the lack of insider conviction with regards to purchasing their own stocks.  The latest data on insider selling and buying continues to show alarmingly low levels of buying accompanied by very high levels of selling.  As we continue to see the very weak rebound in revenues and non-existent hiring it has become more and more clear why insiders lack conviction in their own shares – after all, without a rebound in hiring and organic revenue growth a sustainable economic recovery remains highly unlikely.

Yesterday’s Business Roundtable Survey confirmed much of this.  Despite increased confidence over Q3 we continue to see very low confidence in future hiring and spending.  Hence, the likelihood of a long and slow recovery remains very high:

“The economy is in the throes of a long transition back to health; recovery will be long, extending beyond 2010,” said Ivan G. Seidenberg, Chairman of Business Roundtable and Chairman and CEO of Verizon Communications. “The outlook of our CEOs reflects that reality: we see noticeable gains in sales and capital spending, but employment growth continues to lag.”

surv

See the full BR release here.

Source: BR

Cullen Roche

Cullen Roche

Bio - Coming Soon.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
TwitterYouTube

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
  • Edna Rider

    TPC, I am bearish on the 2010-2012 timeframe, but I don’t happen to think all the noise related to insider selling is that meaningful. Excluding dot com executives most executives haven’t seen their large holdings drop by such a large amount in their lifetimes until 08/early 09. I am sure it was life changing. Most executives build a life around them (multiple houses, cars, girlfriends) that’s very expensive. I know one with a large apt in NYC, large house in Southampton, large ski house in Aspen, large apartment in Paris. This is blindingly expensive and requires lots of cash sitting around in one of those “insured up to 50M” Chase bank accounts. If I held a large chunk of stock in my company I would likely sell too if the market swooned then recovered. It’s a smart hedge (you’re Mr. Risk Mgmt, after all). If the company does great, you have a job, get a raise, and likely get more options. If the company doesn’t do well you’ll be fired and you can retire on all the money you’ve socked away. So I would argue that it isn’t a bullish or bearish sign: it’s a sign that nobody can really see how bad the future is going to be (although it is quite clear it will be seriously bad).

    • Cullen Roche TPC

      I don’t disagree at all. It’s one of these long-term macro indicators that are kind of useless in terms of trading…

  • Balinvadasz

    I’m beginning to think that the reason insiders are not buying is simple: they’re essentially fundamental traders and are not feeling the effects of increased liquidity on the “ground” (for the same reasons that ordinary folk are not better off). Stock prices may get lifted, but their sales volumes and revenues are not.