Home » Most Recent Stories

CREDIT SUISSE: 5 REASONS TO STAY BULLISH NEAR-TERM

23 February 2010 by Cullen Roche 1 Comment

Credit Suisse recently reiterated their call to buy the dips (see here for the original call).   Despite being bearish overall on 2010, they maintain that the first half of 2010 could be a fairly constructive year for equities (see their full year outlook here).   In the near-term, they continue to like stocks due to 5 primary reasons.

Over the last few months the markets have been roiled by sovereign debt fears, China tightening fears, Fed actions, and bank regulation.  Credit Suisse says these fears are all overblown.

First, they say the fears in Greece are substantially overblown and will not lead to a global bond funding crisis:

1) Fears of a global sovereign credit crisis are overdone: US, Japan and German bond yields have fallen, as has gold (hardly the sign of a funding crisis). The problems in peripheral Europe are akin to those of California in the US: Severe deflation is required, but the problem is confined. A global bond funding crisis will not be seen, in our opinion, until private sector credit growth returns (probably in 2011)—government interest payments as a % of GDP are still low, at 1.3% of GDP in the US. The risk, in our view, is that the UK could end up with a minority government, which might bring forward a UK funding crisis.

Second, CS says the fears about China are overdone.  Growth remains robust in China.  Other countries can only wish to have such a problem.  As of now, it is not a major concern:

2) Worries about China  tightening:  We believe China is likely to grow at around 10% until there is major economic, as opposed to financial, overheating, which would be reflected in a sharp acceleration in wage growth and export price inflation.

A lot has been said about the end of quantitative easing and what will occur in bond markets when the Fed stops buying.  CS says demand for bonds will remain high regardless of the Fed’s actions.

3) The end of QE: We think banks will replace central banks as the major buyers of bonds—and overall monetary conditions are still extremely loose.

Regulation is unlikely to change the fundamental picture of the big banks.  Banks are and have been cheap for some time.  Regulation will not change their value and CS still likes the risk/reward in the sector.

4) Obama-ing the banks: Even assuming regulation reduces banks profitability to pre-1990 levels, this would leave the fair-value tangible book multiple at 1.1x. This implies only about 10% downside for Continental European banks and 15% downside for US banks. Meanwhile, bank lending conditions have loosened significantly.

Lastly, CS sees improvement in the jobs market in the coming months.  The one great hurdle during the recovery has been and remains jobs.  Job growth should lead to higher equity markets in the coming months.

5) Worries about US employment momentum stalling: We think corporates have over-shed labour (hours worked are down 9% and GDP is down 2% from peak) and we believe non-farm payrolls will continue to improve.

As the equity markets overcome these near-term negative trends the equity markets could surge above 1200 according to CS.  That, however, is all likely to change in the second half when new headwinds hit the market.

Source: Credit Suisse

Cullen Roche

Cullen Roche

Bio - Coming Soon.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
TwitterYouTube

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
  • chris

    all this sums up my attitude pretty well…until i read the consumer confidence numbers. i am fearful we are getting betwixt a rock and a hard place, with the public clamoring for additional stimulus (no jobs!), then going bi-polar and clamoring we have to reduce spending because of the deficit. the manic political landscape will only become worse when this show health care summit transitions into an attempt to put health care through by reconciliation in the senate (although i see the house dems tripping on their you know what in the process). so this political miasma is beginning to make me think it is time to trim my longs.