Home » Most Recent Stories

CREDIT UPDATE – THE EMERGING MARKET CONTAGION

25 September 2011 by Martin T., Macronomics 10 Comments

By Martin, Macronomics

“If you don’t have a functioning financial system the world economy won’t be revived. All the major economies have their responsibility to assist at a pace which is required to clean up the balance sheet of the banking system and to ensure that credit flows are resumed.” - Manmohan Singh

Contagion we have in Emerging markets:

Daily Focus Graph

Source CMA:

The trend in Ukraine:
Daily Focus Graph

No more Viagra ((Pfizer (PFE) long-term rating cut to A+ from AA- by Fitch; Outlook Stable) for China, as one stimulus after another is getting pulled out – this time around, it is not like Haier Electronic Group as we discussed previously with subsidies for home appliances.  Instead, loan approvals are getting withdrawn:

China’s Squeeze on Property Market Nearing ‘Tipping Point’ – Bloomberg – 23rd of September:

The squeeze on China’s property market may be reaching a “tipping point” that drives growth lower just when exports are under threat from a global slowdown and investor confidence is plunging, said Zhang Zhiwei, Hong Kong-based chief China economist at Nomura Holdings Inc.
Land transactions in 133 cities tracked by Soufun Holdings Ltd., the country’s biggest real-estate website, fell 14 percent by area in August from a month earlier. Prices of new homes declined in 16 of 70 cities last month compared with July, according to government data.”

Pop goes the real estate bubble in China, from the same article:

“Property construction is a mainstay of investment that last year drove more than a half of economic growth while land sales contributed 40 percent of revenues earned by local authorities that have amassed 10.7 trillion yuan ($1.67 trillion) of debt.

A funding squeeze on developers risks a “domino effect” as companies needing cash cut prices, forcing others to follow, Credit Suisse Group AG said yesterday.

“We’re reaching a tipping point where land sales are dropping much faster than before, developers are losing more access to bank financing, and housing prices are showing weakness,” Nomura’s Zhang said in an interview in Beijing yesterday.”

And Bloomberg to add:

The price of land in Beijing slumped 76 percent in August from a month earlier, while in Guangzhou it plummeted 53 percent, according to Soufun. Land auction failures surged 242 percent in the first seven months of this year because of government curbs on the property market, the Beijing Times reported Aug. 3.”

A Chinese Subprime crisis in the making?

“Some developers have turned to trust firms for financing, usually in the form of loans that are repackaged into investment products and sold to retail investors. The debt is typically funded by banks or investors themselves, according to Samsung Securities Asia Ltd.”

Worst Asia Currency Drop Since ’97 Spoils Debt – Source Bloomberg:

So, no safe haven anymore even in Asia as its redemption/liquidation time for some global macro players.

Source Bloomberg – Kyoungwha Kim and Jiyeun Lee – 23rd of September:

The Bloomberg-JPMorgan Asian Dollar Index slumped 4.3 percent this month, heading for its biggest loss since December, 1997, led by a 9.6 percent decline in South Korea’s won. Korea Exchange Inc. prices show the yield on 10-year government debt soared 27 basis points, or 0.27 percentage point, to 3.82 percent, from an all-time low on Sept. 14. The yield on similar Indonesian debt jumped 68 basis points this month to 7.47 percent, after touching a record low on Sept. 9.”

And EM for Global Macro players is a crowded trade according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch research, hence the liquidation we started to see and mentioned in the post “Markets update – Credit – Anterograde and Retrograde amnesia“:

Emerging Markets, which until recently had been preserved from the onslaught, have been affected as well by the revised growth picture published by the IMF, cutting its forecast to 4% from 4.3% in June 2011 – Source Bank of America Merrill Lynch Research:

So Australia and Australian banks please beware:
[Graph Name]

And given commodities based countries are in the frontline in relation to a Chinese slowdown, it is of no surprise that commodities based currencies are taking a beating in the process:

AUD/USD, 2008 until the 22nd of September picture – Bloomberg:

Canadian dollar is exposed as well:

And my good credit friend to comment:

“The equity market finally realized what the credit market was” flashing” for a while… and reacted accordingly. But the race to catch back with the credit market has still a long way to go…and the path may not be a straight line. Bottom line, equities will go lower as the new “norm” of slow economy worldwide will be accepted…

Which means lower prices for commodities (goodbye Canadian dollar and Australian dollar carry trade), higher US dollar (a higher US dollar and slower growth will be the poison pill for the international US corporations)…”

No more safe havens, even in Switzerland, as the country now flirts with deflation, Japanese style:

Source Bloomberg.

Like Japan, Switzerland is suffering from currency appreciation, tipping it towards deflation in the process, with 30 year Swiss Government bonds yielding less than Japanese 30 year bonds, with a yield at around 1.30%. The Swiss National Bank is warning that its Consumer Prices may decline 0.3% in 2012.

As a follow-up on our last post where we discussed the sell-off in Emerging Markets currencies, we now have 4 countries trying to prop up their currencies, namely, Russia, India, Argentina, and now Brazil.  According to Bloomberg in relation to Brazil:

“The central bank sold 55,075 currency swap contracts in auctions, which was equivalent to selling dollars in the futures market. The last time policy makers entered the derivatives market to weaken the dollar was in June 26, 2009, according to the central bank. Yesterday’s measure marked a reversal of a 28-month-old strategy of buying dollars to weaken the currency.”

Brazil Sovereign CDS climbed 23 bps on the 22nd of September to 219 bps according to CMA. No, inflation is not the immediate threat, deflation is. US treasuries returned so far 1.7% in September, 8.9% gain year to date.  And my good credit friend added on this:

” ‘No more risk free assets’ may result in a big re-pricing of all asset classes.

When there is too much debt in a system and when everybody is reluctant to erase the debt, the only solution is to deflate the value of the debt and the capital in order to bring them in line with the value of the assets or collateral… The trend will be “to deflate”, because we are in “deflation” … even if nobody wants to hear it.”

Ratio MSCI EMERGING MARKETS/ MSCI WORLD:

“Prosperity makes friends, adversity tries them.” - Publilius Syrus

Stay Tuned!

Martin T., Macronomics

Martin T. is a credit specialist with a London based bank. During his career he's had different roles within various banks, covering everything from FX to High Grade Bonds. He has always been passionate about markets and particularly on Macro trends.

More Posts - Website

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
  • Octavio Richetta

    As I said in my last post in the previous thread, ZIRP/low expected returns is making even smart investors like GMO do foolish things like having too much exposure to emerging markets which at the end cannot escape the fact that they are mainly export-based economies.

  • theta theta

    Since when is Austria an emerging market?

    Also, the “good credit friend” mentions that “‘No more risk free assets’ may result in a big re-pricing of all asset classes”. Where does he get that there are “no more risk free assets”? Has there been any change to the usual risk off behaviour of bidding up treasuries and dollar rising against pretty much all currencies? This “no more risk free assets” rhetoric was first mentioned after the S&P downgrade of US debt in August, and people have been using it since, when all evidence proves them wrong, with the same usual risk free assets skyrocketing in value as all risk assets deflate. Yet, this “expert” mentions this term even in a discussion where he warns for massive deflation. Go figure.

    • Theta,

      It is worth highlighting Austria given the exposure of its banking system to Eastern Europe. In fact it is quite interesting to see that in the CDS space, it has taken quite a few months before seeing a repricing of Austria’s sovereign CDS to higher levels.

      In relation to the risk free theory, it is the basis of modern theory portfolio. Theories are assumed to be working until they don’t. On another subject was Einstein wrong with his theory, given some scientists claim to have beaten the speed of light?

      For more on the subject of the disappearance of the notion of risk free rates, I wrote a post on the subject:
      http://macronomy.blogspot.com/2011/09/curious-case-of-disappearance-of-risk.html

      Two strategies that worked well so far, have been, long treasuries for deflation fears, long gold for inflation fears.

      David Goldman sums it up nicely in one of his post:
      http://blog.atimes.net/?p=1933
      “One of the stranger market phenomena of the past year was that gold and Treasury bonds (especially TIPS) traded in tandem, as we discussed in an August 11 Macrostrategy report. That seemed odd, because for many years they typically had traded in opposite directions: gold hedged the inflation risk on bonds. Option theory provided a simple explanation: If bonds are a deflation hedge, and gold is an inflation hedge, and the market does not know which way out the politicians will choose in a crunch, both trade off volatility. In effect the market put a giant straddle on the monetary system, buying both puts (bonds) and calls (gold) on inflation.”

      Best,

      Martin

      • theta theta

        Sorry but I’m not really convinced that gold is a good inflation hedge at all. We didn’t have massive deflation in the 80s and 90s and likewise we haven’t had high inflation in the last 3-4 years. What really drives the price of gold is real interest rates expectations. As real interest rates are just as much affected by inflation as they are by interest rates, it’s not really strange to see both treasuries and gold rallying at the same time.

        With regards to the “straddle” on inflation, if that were the case, then given that inflation hasn’t really moved in the last few years of both bonds and gold rallying, it means, in options lingo, that the decay (theta) you pay for the straddle has been more than offset by vega gains, i.e. higher and higher implied volatility for future moves in inflation expectations. This only happens in the real world for example in the days leading up to earnings announcement for companies. I am not at all convinced that this has any resemblance to today’s macro environment. Quite the contrary, there’s an ever increasing probability of an extended period of low inflation and low growth, without a massive move in either side of the deflation/inflation spectrum. Implied volatility for treasuries and TIPS does not contradict my thesis. I would be happy to be provided with evidence to the contrary, please do.

        As for theories being proved wrong and portfolio theory in particular being flawed, I agree, but that’s not the point. Obviously finance is not a perfect physics experiment where everything goes according to what the equations predict. If there was ever a chance to model the market you would have to employ an advanced system dynamics model with several (not to mention several thousand) feedback loops. But as simple models go, CAPM is as good a model as we have, and the statement “no more risk free assets” (hinting to US debt being “no good” any more) is flawed to say the least. Especially if the guy works in credit, I wonder what is he thinking making that statement, especially after seeing treasury yields collapse and all credit spread widen significantly in the last few weeks.

        • Hi Theta,

          You said:
          “Quite the contrary, there’s an ever increasing probability of an extended period of low inflation and low growth, without a massive move in either side of the deflation/inflation spectrum. Implied volatility for treasuries and TIPS does not contradict my thesis. I would be happy to be provided with evidence to the contrary, please do.”

          Couple of thoughts,

          David Goldman quoted laureate Robert Mundell on the risk of deflation (from WSJ):

          http://blog.atimes.net/?p=1796

          “Nobel Laureate Robert Mundell—says dollar weakness is not his main concern. Instead, he fears a return to recession later this year when QE2 ends and the dollar begins its inevitable rise. Deflation, not inflation, should be the greater concern. Avoiding the recession is simplicity itself: Just have the U.S. Treasury fix the exchange rate between the dollar and the euro.”

          “The key to Mr. Mundell’s view is that exchange rates transmit inflation or deflation into economies by raising or lowering prices for imported items and commodities. For example, when the dollar declines significantly against the world’s second-leading currency, the euro, commodity prices rise. This creates U.S. inflationary pressure. Conversely, when the dollar appreciates significantly against the euro, commodity prices fall, which leads to deflationary pressure.”

          and David Goldman to comment:
          “the Fed wants inflation and says so, but may not be able to get it, because the Fed’s largesse isn’t translated into lending to the private sector. That’s a Japan-style pushing-on-a-string problem. Even if the Fed stops buying Treasuries, there is huge demand for securities from the banks.”

          You commented: “With regards to the “straddle” on inflation”
          It is not a straddle on inflation, it is a straddle on monetary policy.

          More on the subject of the optionality of the situation, described nicely by David Goldman with an interesting scattered plot:

          http://blog.atimes.net/?p=1933

          “The definition of a bond, by the way, is a strip of options on the short-term interest rate. If you knew for certain that the short rate would be zero forever, than the yield on a perpetual bond also wold be zero, and so forth. Gold, I have argued for years, is not a gauge of the price level but an option on the collapse of the dollar’s reserve status.”

          You said:
          “the statement “no more risk free assets” (hinting to US debt being “no good” any more) is flawed to say the least”

          http://blog.atimes.net/?p=1874

          David Goldman once again had an interesting point on the subject, which relates to the US downgrade:
          “it’s not just the rating, but the political foulup that leads to the downgrade, that makes the world riskier. It will contribute to the countercyclical tightening of reserve requirements that is forcing banks to raise more capital and in some cases shed assets. And it will detract from risk-taking. If your safest assets just turned riskier, you’re less likely to take additional portfolio risk.”

          So what we are seeing is reduction of risk and repricing of risk, forced liquidation, redemption and deleveraging.

          Best,

          Martin

          • theta theta

            The report you linked to actually says option on inflation, not on monetary policy, which is what you probably mean as well, but regardless, this is semantics. The main point is that neither gold nor TIPS or other bonds are “options” as is erroneously said in that report. They don’t have the non-linear convex payoff of options and they don’t decay in value as a form of reverse amortisation of that convexity. In fact, the “evidence” (more data mining really but anyway) in that report only suggests futures-like characteristic (i.e. linear, with no optionality).

            I agree that there’s reduction of risk and deleveraging, but this has nothing to do with a supposed absence of a risk-free asset.

          • Andrew P

            The statement on “no risk free assets” is actually true. With T-bills/bonds, you will get your dollars back, but you take the risk as to what those dollars will be worth when you get them. Especially, if you are a foreigner exchanging a native currency for dollars. And the more people that pile into T-bills, the lower rates will go, until they go sharply negative. Then you won’t even get your dollars back, but have to pay a storage cost.

            Everything other than T-bills can of course have a big drop in price.

            I found a little news snippet to be interesting. It appears that Siemens is one of a very few EU industrial firms with the privelege of stashing its Euros with the ECB, since it has a banking license. Does anyone know of any other EU industrial firms with the same privelege? This could be very useful info during a Eurozone crash, because the Eurozone has no equivalent to our T-bills. The firms that can stash their Euros way well be the only survivors if all the wheels come off.

  • Johann

    According to some Chinese news websites, the price
    of housing barely budged in August, so is it possible
    that the plunge in land was biased by some
    one time events ?