Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

Decomposing Household Net Worth

Here’s a very good post from Steve Roth over at Asymptosis which breaks down how household net worth is derived.  Basically, household net worth comes almost entirely from the market value of financial assets:

hh_nw

That makes sense.  It’s something I go into in some detail in my book. But you have to look at the aggregate accounting to understand why this is. At face value, the net worth of the entire financial asset world is zero. In fact, net worth = nonfinancial assets. Balance sheets balance so at face value the aggregate financial world has no financial asset net worth. Of course, we don’t value financial assets at face value. We value them at market value. And when you add market value into the equation then the economy has a massively positive net worth because the market values of many financial assets is well above their face value.

Why is this important? Well, when we look at saving it’s important not to fall for the fallacy of composition. When we decompose where saving comes from it becomes obvious that, in the aggregate, we cannot all “save” our way to financial freedom. That is, since one entity’s spending is another entity’s income then saving more of your income actually leads to less saving in the aggregate. As I’ve stated before, saving is not the key to financial success. In fact, investment (investment is spending for future production, not stock market “investing”, which is actually a form of allocating savings) is the key to financial success because successful investment can add not only to nonfinancial asset creation, but it can also add to the market value of financial saving.  When you begin to understand this point it becomes obvious that our financial asset world is built on a foundation of output.  And the quality and quantity of that output will ultimately determine how healthy our aggregate balance sheets really are.  More importantly, it becomes clear that saving is not the key to financial success.

Related: