DEEP THOUGHTS FROM SETH KLARMAN
Seth Klarman, the legendary hedge fund manager at Baupost is increasingly concerned about the macro investing environment. With the retirements of several prominent hedge fund managers in recent months he’s clearly not alone in his thinking. In a recent interview (see here for the entire interview) Klarman provides some excellent macro insights and explains why he is more worried about the world than he has been in his entire career. Klarman echos comments I have often made here. In effect, the recovery has been almost entirely artificial and will result in unquantifiable future threats. Klarman calls the current market a “Hostess Twinkie”:
“A Hostess Twinkie is a confection that has made many childhoods slightly happier, but it is composed of totally artificial ingredients. My context, of about 6–12 months ago, was that virtually everything was being manipulated by the government. Nothing was natural in the markets. Interest rates were held at zero, the government was buying all kinds of securities—notably, mortgage securities—and who knows what else has ended up on the Fed’s balance sheet.
We have had lending programs—Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), Cash for Clunkers, and even Cash for Caulkers. We just don’t know the full extent to which investors have been manipulated. But certainly, the government wants people to buy equities, to invest so that the market will move higher, creating a wealth effect or at least eliminating the negative wealth effect in order to make people feel better about their situation, to restore a degree of optimism so that the economy might recover.
I am worried to this day about what would happen to the markets, to the economy if, in the midst of all these manipulations, we realized that they are, in fact, a Twinkie. I think the answer is that no one knows, including those in Washington. Will the economy continue to recover and grow at a healthy rate or will we sink into a double-dip recession? As we can all see, the high degree of government involvement continues.”
Of course, the USA isn’t the only country kicking the can. Klarman cites the European bailout as another game of government kick the can:
“The European bailout is gargantuan. I doubt it will work because it kicks the can further down the road and is yet one more manipulation that encourages people to own securities. It is almost as if our government is in the business of giving people bad advice: “We are going to hold rates at zero. Please buy stocks or junk bonds that will yield [an inadequate] 5 or 6 percent.” In effect, it forces unsophisticated investors to speculate wildly on securities that are too overvalued.”
All of this has Klarman more concerned than he has ever been. That’s a mouthful from a legend like Klarman who has seen more than his fair share of cycles:
“I am more worried about the world, more broadly, than I have ever been in my career.”
Like myself, Klarman believes there are unquantifiable repercussions from the bailouts:
“I am also troubled that we didn’t get the value out of this crisis that we should have. The Great Depression led us to a generation—or even two generations—of changed behavior. I grew up hearing about how our grandparents had a “depression mentality.” It’s awful to have a depression, but it’s a great thing to have a depression mentality because it means that we are not speculating, we are not living beyond our means, we don’t quit our job to take a big risk because we know we might not get another job. There is something stable about a country, a society built on those values.
In some sense, from the recent crisis we have developed a “really bad couple of weeks” mentality, and that’s not enough to tide us through, teach us to avoid future bubbles, and ensure a strong recovery.”
Klarman isn’t a macro expert (he’s a bottom up investor), but something just doesn’t pass the sniff test with all these bailouts. How can the global economy continually bailout the losers without ever allowing these excesses to truly pass from the system? Klarman says we will eventually reach a tipping point:
“A tipping point is invisible, as we just saw in Greece. In most situations, everything appears fine until it’s not fine, until, for example, no one shows up at a Treasury auction. In the meantime, we can be lulled into thinking all is well, that the United States will always be rated triple-A. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner speaks as if—at least in his public statements—he has been lulled into thinking that the United States will always be triple-A. That kind of thinking guarantees that someday the United States will no longer be triple-A. A sovereign deserves to be rated triple-A only if it has valuable assets, a good education system, a great infrastructure, and the rule of law, all of which are called into question by an eroding infrastructure, a government that changes the law or violates it whenever there is a crisis, and a legislature that shows no fiscal responsibility. There is an old saying, “How did you go bankrupt?” And the answer is, “Gradually, and then suddenly.” The impending fiscal crisis in the United States will make its appearance in the same way.”
Klarman finds the current environment particularly difficult because many of the hedges that have been working are more speculative in nature. He finds little value in most commodities (with the exception of land) because commodities offer no real cash flow and instead rely almost entirely on some future “greater fool” buying the asset from you. Klarman makes an exception with gold, however:
“Gold is unique because it has the age-old aspect of being viewed as a store of value. Nevertheless, it’s still a commodity and has no tangible value, and so I would say that gold is a speculation. But because of my fear about the potential debasing of paper money and about paper money not being a store of value, I want some exposure to gold.”
Klarman sees all of this government intervention resulting in higher rates of inflation:
“I think the odds are low that such high inflation will happen in the near future, but looking ahead five years, it becomes more likely, although certainly not a 50/50 chance. With a very limited initial outlay, I think a hedge like ours is a reasonable protection.”
Ultimately, the downside of the current bailout fever comes in the form of an intangible risk. Capitalism without losers is like Catholocism without hell. Klarman sees no way of avoiding future collapses given that we’ve never actually been forced to learn from our past collapses:
“Essentially, the problem is that government intervention interfered with the lessons investors needed to learn. Those who stared into the metaphorical abyss are right back at it, with the possible exception of college endowments, for whom the pain has been long lasting because of their spend rate. Almost everybody else is drinking the Kool Aid again, and it is very troubling. We could have another serious collapse, and people would again not be prepared for it.”






Klarman is one of the greats. Thanks for passing his thoughts along.
Voice of sanity and reality.
Also like your quote of “Capitalism without losers is like Catholocism without hell.” Sadly the instant gratification lemmings are lulled into “really bad couple of weeks” mentality”.
This is from an interview that Klarman had in May, and doesn’t represent **necessarily** any progression in his thinking since then.
I don’t recall this presentation on CNBC. Nor do I recall any politician speaking like this — regardless of party. Klarman must be a quack
First this is from May…not recent
Second, he does not even understand the monetary system and has been duped as had 99% of the populace. He is worried about funding the debt when every week mr Roche tells us anyone worried about debt has no idea about how US monetary system works,
He admits he is not a macro expert which might actually be the most interesting part of the entire interview….for reasons I’ll leave to the reader to debate.
Great stuff. I havent seen very many people explain the problems in such common sense terms. This whole system is like the matrix. There is zero reality.
i agree w/him on all but US debt–but thats currently…..eventually its a problem even for the US.
It’s awful to have a depression, but it’s a great thing to have a depression mentality because it means that we are not speculating, we are not living beyond our means, we don’t quit our job to take a big risk because we know we might not get another job. There is something stable about a country, a society built on those values. SETH KLARMAN
If a depression mentality is stable then why did we ever abandon it? The boom-bust cycle is of course unstable. One day it will destroy the world if we don’t find a better way.
As for speculating, isn’t leverage via the government backed fractional reserve banking cartel the key to that? Eliminate the government backing and most of the speculating must cease as well, eh?
TPC,
Klarman says exactly what I have been saying for over a year. In truth my beliefs were learned primarily from writers on your site and four others. I have gleaned a list of over 30 finance writers ( economists,traders, etc.) all of whom have had excellent proven ( made their call ahead of the event in print) track records of major calls on the US and world economies. Klarman in his own words is saying much the same things that John Hussman has been writing about for quite some time now. Klarman need not worry that we have not learned our lessons, that time is right around the corner. All bubbles burst and this market bubble will not be an exception. It is following the nature of previous bubbles in that those profitting from the bubble will do all in their power to keep it going as long as they can. I am in firm agreement with Tavakoli, Denninger, Hussman,yourself and many others in that we would have been better served as a society to have allowed the bad firms go bankrupt as that would have allowed the market to clear much sooner.
SK,
Well said, and true,
Had we experienced not bailing out the too big to fail(s),
the country would have had at least a fighting chance of coming back from it.
Now our massive indebtedness stands in the way.
I’d say Depression era values have been transferred from the people to their governments in the last 50 years, and the majority of Depression era influence today resides in those nearing or already retired. These folks have been voting a long time and would generally find it difficult to change their vote. We’ll see.
We have been unwilling to vote for hardship today in order to secure a better tomorrow, quite the opposite it appears. Neither Democrat nor Republican parties will ever suggest we need hardship beforehand; a better tomorrow disappears and inevitably hardship arrives.
I agree with Klarman. The future is frightening.
As for the decifit spending, we might have been better off having a one year tax holiday, or at least a payroll tax holiday. That would have instantly put money in the hands of consumers.
We had a lot of Gov’t spending, but noone knows where the money went.
As to the debt problem: There is a tendency to think that things will stay the same; but this is not the case.
We are at the lowest interest rates in most of our lifetimes. And, we are
piling up more debt. There is a saying in statistics that “everything returns to the norm”. Apply this to interest rates and public debt, and one can see in the future a doubling or a tripling of government debt service, both at the Federal and State levels. Can anyone figure how we are going to be able to pay for this??\