David Rosenberg runs the numbers on the rarity of a 60+ ISM Manufacturing figure and whether it means the economy and the markets have peaked.  His data goes back to 1950:

1. To put the 60.8 January reading into historical perspective, this level is relatively high and we found that on an upswing, we only see readings close to this level around 2% of the time. Moreover, the percent of the time this level represented a high was 20%. On average, the index peaked five months later and five points higher — so we could see the ISM go higher over the next few months.

2. Economic growth tends to slow after a post-60 reading. Real GDP averaged 6% four-quarters before the peak and about 3.5% after. Industrial production averaged 10% before and about 5% a year after.

3. What about equities post-ISM peaks? We found that the S&P 500 rallied 15% in the year leading up to the peak, and 4% one year after.

4. One standout detail in the January report was the ISM prices paid component, which rose to 81.5. We could still go higher from here though, as the current level represents a peak 25% of the time.

5. We found that around prices paid peaks, total inflation averaged 3.4% a year before, 4% at the peak and 6% after. Core inflation (excluding food and energy) averaged 3% before, 2% at the peak and 3% after (so no real effect on core inflation). The 10-year note yield tended to average about 50bps higher post peak than pre-peak.

6. Profits tend to slow around both ISM peaks and prices paid peaks. Using economy-wide profits from the National Accounts, profit growth ran at 15% pre-ISM prices paid peak versus 5% after.

7. Margins are set to compress and compress sharply and likely weigh against consensus views of +15% earnings growth this year. See Steel-Price Rises Pressure Supply Chain on page B1 of the WS. Unit labour costs are falling, albeit at a far slower rate than a year ago (-0.2% YoY versus -3.5% this time last year). And look for non-unit labour costs, like higher inventory financing expenses, to bite into profit margins as well — see Fearing Inflation, Firms Stocking Up on page C1 of the WSJ.

Source: Gluskin Sheff


Got a comment or question about this post? Feel free to use the Ask Cullen section, leave a comment in the forum or send me a message on Twitter.

Cullen Roche

Mr. Roche is the Founder of Orcam Financial Group, LLC. Orcam is a financial services firm offering research, private advisory, institutional consulting and educational services.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:

  • non_economist_fortunately

    oh, oh, David.
    oh, oh, TPC.

  • ObaMao

    Companies may be placing order to lock in today’s prices.

    I’m hearing more of shipment delays out of China (well before CNY) due to worker shortages and new price increases effective March after end of CNY holiday as factories pass down the raw material, labor and food (since most workers live in rabbit cage dorms) costs. Foxconn giving their workers whopping 40% increase really screwed up the labor shortage situations as other factories were forced to match the increase. Workers are also demanding better food as companies cut back on canteen food but pork and vegetable prices have gone up 20%.

    So better go and buy those “cheap” Chinese products now as China may be blamed for exporting inflation later this year.

  • Derfem

    “2. Economic growth tends to slow after a post-60 reading. Real GDP averaged 6% four-quarters before the peak and about 3.5% after. Industrial production averaged 10% before and about 5% a year after.”

    If you transpose these numbers to the “new normal”, with GDP growth of 3-3.5% BEFORE, what will be the growth AFTER ? 1-1.5% ?

  • Ashkat

    Rosenberg putting more of his spin on things. He’ll get it right one day.

  • Balderdash

    Drivel. Means are meaningless in the real world. Models make more money.

  • js

    “he’ll get it right one day….” yea, nevermind that all he is doing is listing indisputable facts.

  • js

    chart ISM vs SPX (1mo lag) and tell me it’s not a model to consider…. over the last 2yrs, I calculate an R^2 of 0.86….