<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EARNINGS UPDATE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-9/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-9</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-9/comment-page-1#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-9#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>Thanks TPC.  I appreciate the feedback.  I&#039;m still learning the psychology and dynamics of the market.  And sorry for harping on the foreclosure wave coming!  I gotta vent somewhere. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks TPC.  I appreciate the feedback.  I&#39;m still learning the psychology and dynamics of the market.  And sorry for harping on the foreclosure wave coming!  I gotta vent somewhere. <img src='http://pragcap.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-9/comment-page-1#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-9#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be shocked if that happens, but as of now they&#039;re still cutting estimates.  Remember Onlooker, the market doesn&#039;t go down in a straight line.  As you&#039;ve mentioned, it would be very rare for the market to trough at such a high PE.  But that doesn&#039;t mean it can&#039;t trough in 2011 or 2012....I was actually bullish in my 2009 stock market predictions.  Not because I believed the economy was going to genuinely rebound, but because I believe we came down too far too fast and it could take years for the market to digest the negativity of the de-leveraging that is actually occurring.  We&#039;re seeing the false dawn in housing that I called for and as you&#039;ve said dozens of times the real resets begin NEXT year.  Don&#039;t be shocked if this economy retrenches hard in Q3 - Q1 of 09 and 2010....What we&#039;re definitely not getting is a sharp recovery....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t be shocked if that happens, but as of now they&#39;re still cutting estimates.  Remember Onlooker, the market doesn&#39;t go down in a straight line.  As you&#39;ve mentioned, it would be very rare for the market to trough at such a high PE.  But that doesn&#39;t mean it can&#39;t trough in 2011 or 2012&#8230;.I was actually bullish in my 2009 stock market predictions.  Not because I believed the economy was going to genuinely rebound, but because I believe we came down too far too fast and it could take years for the market to digest the negativity of the de-leveraging that is actually occurring.  We&#39;re seeing the false dawn in housing that I called for and as you&#39;ve said dozens of times the real resets begin NEXT year.  Don&#39;t be shocked if this economy retrenches hard in Q3 &#8211; Q1 of 09 and 2010&#8230;.What we&#39;re definitely not getting is a sharp recovery&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-9/comment-page-1#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-9#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another thought.  What if the current optimism leads analysts to once again start pumping up their estimates for Q3 (I doubt they&#039;d do it for Q2) and then we start missing on those when this great recovery doesn&#039;t really pan out (which is where we&#039;re going IMO)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe that will be the next big leg down after one of the smallest, shortest &quot;bulls&quot; on record.  Thoughts TPC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#39;s another thought.  What if the current optimism leads analysts to once again start pumping up their estimates for Q3 (I doubt they&#39;d do it for Q2) and then we start missing on those when this great recovery doesn&#39;t really pan out (which is where we&#39;re going IMO)?</p>
<p>Maybe that will be the next big leg down after one of the smallest, shortest &#8220;bulls&#8221; on record.  Thoughts TPC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-9/comment-page-1#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-9#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>Yes it&#039;s understandable why the market reacts positively when a company beat expectations.  The question is why are the valuing companies so highly such that we&#039;re at such high valuations of P/E no matter how you figure them.  We&#039;re in the middle of a tremendous debt deflationary contraction and the worse downturn since the GD, by most objective measures.  So how can all that be &quot;discounted&quot; at 900 on the SP500?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess the investing public has been so numbed to high P/Es by the tech bubble and the debt bubble, and trained to accept that valuation, that they just can&#039;t keep their hands off anything with a P/E less than 15, much less 10.  And a whole lot higher too right now.  Are we doomed to never see really attractive valuations again?  Or will it take another 7 years or more of a grinding secular bear to get us there?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess that&#039;s my take on it now.  Only when we go through another cyclical bull or two (of decreasing size I&#039;d bet), and people have lost money on today&#039;s buys, will the value investing perspective come back to the fore.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How depressing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it&#39;s understandable why the market reacts positively when a company beat expectations.  The question is why are the valuing companies so highly such that we&#39;re at such high valuations of P/E no matter how you figure them.  We&#39;re in the middle of a tremendous debt deflationary contraction and the worse downturn since the GD, by most objective measures.  So how can all that be &#8220;discounted&#8221; at 900 on the SP500?  </p>
<p>I guess the investing public has been so numbed to high P/Es by the tech bubble and the debt bubble, and trained to accept that valuation, that they just can&#39;t keep their hands off anything with a P/E less than 15, much less 10.  And a whole lot higher too right now.  Are we doomed to never see really attractive valuations again?  Or will it take another 7 years or more of a grinding secular bear to get us there?</p>
<p>I guess that&#39;s my take on it now.  Only when we go through another cyclical bull or two (of decreasing size I&#39;d bet), and people have lost money on today&#39;s buys, will the value investing perspective come back to the fore.</p>
<p>How depressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

