<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EARNINGS UPDATE &#8211; COULD THE ANALYSTS HAVE BEEN MORE WRONG?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-could-the-analysts-have-been-more-wrong/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-could-the-analysts-have-been-more-wrong</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:32:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-could-the-analysts-have-been-more-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-3714</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6859#comment-3714</guid>
		<description>Some deadly serious humour....about the company that has the only analysts that never miss a call....

http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&amp;sid=a2X3hNaWcbeg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some deadly serious humour&#8230;.about the company that has the only analysts that never miss a call&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&#038;sid=a2X3hNaWcbeg" rel="nofollow">http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&#038;sid=a2X3hNaWcbeg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-could-the-analysts-have-been-more-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-3669</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6859#comment-3669</guid>
		<description>TCP:

I know you follow fundamentals more than any other indicator. I wanted to point out though that a rising wedge in technical analysis most likely will result in a break towards the primary trend (i.e. bearish):

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_l8gHrhQiXlE/Sm8jFjysLaI/AAAAAAAAAfM/cXAtOIrlXJI/s1600-h/afl.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TCP:</p>
<p>I know you follow fundamentals more than any other indicator. I wanted to point out though that a rising wedge in technical analysis most likely will result in a break towards the primary trend (i.e. bearish):</p>
<p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_l8gHrhQiXlE/Sm8jFjysLaI/AAAAAAAAAfM/cXAtOIrlXJI/s1600-h/afl.png" rel="nofollow">http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_l8gHrhQiXlE/Sm8jFjysLaI/AAAAAAAAAfM/cXAtOIrlXJI/s1600-h/afl.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-could-the-analysts-have-been-more-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-3667</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6859#comment-3667</guid>
		<description>The ER compares estimates to actual reports.  It is forward looking in that I use guidance as well as current quarterly results to come up with the results.  That&#039;s why it bottomed almost exactly in-line with the trough in quarterly earnings reports.  That sharp slope in the curve is showing just how far off the analysts still are.  

I would expect this to normalize a bit in the coming quarters as analysts play catch up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ER compares estimates to actual reports.  It is forward looking in that I use guidance as well as current quarterly results to come up with the results.  That&#8217;s why it bottomed almost exactly in-line with the trough in quarterly earnings reports.  That sharp slope in the curve is showing just how far off the analysts still are.  </p>
<p>I would expect this to normalize a bit in the coming quarters as analysts play catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-could-the-analysts-have-been-more-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-3666</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6859#comment-3666</guid>
		<description>paul,

it technically ends when Wal-Mart reports, but there is no real end.  Instead, it peaks this week and tapers off over the coming two weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paul,</p>
<p>it technically ends when Wal-Mart reports, but there is no real end.  Instead, it peaks this week and tapers off over the coming two weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-could-the-analysts-have-been-more-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-3661</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6859#comment-3661</guid>
		<description>When will the current earnings season end? Is their an official end? What is the lag between the official end and when the weak fundamentals expected to reassert?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will the current earnings season end? Is their an official end? What is the lag between the official end and when the weak fundamentals expected to reassert?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-could-the-analysts-have-been-more-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-3659</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6859#comment-3659</guid>
		<description>TPC,

I love the idea of developing your own indicator - fun and useful.  I went back in the archives to see if I could find some of your older ER data.  I found one that you published in January (23rd?).  My observation is that the slope of the ER has been positive (rising) since early December.  There is one drop in late May early June, but that is it.  In the January commentary you mentioned that the ER &quot;has only recently turned positive&quot;.  This would mean, I would guess, that either EPS or analysts estimates were negative and have now turned positive.  I guess you&#039;d have a problem if they were both negative!  ;-)  

This brings me to my questions:  

- It looks like it is the slope that is most important - correct?
- The ER seems to have been &quot;bullish&quot; starting at least in December and &quot;missed&quot; (probably too negative of a word here) the March low.  The indicator hinges on analyst numbers so I can see the ratio being useful in these earnings weeks, but I am trying to figure out how to interpret the ratio at other times?

Great job coming up with the index.  Thanks.

-tyler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TPC,</p>
<p>I love the idea of developing your own indicator &#8211; fun and useful.  I went back in the archives to see if I could find some of your older ER data.  I found one that you published in January (23rd?).  My observation is that the slope of the ER has been positive (rising) since early December.  There is one drop in late May early June, but that is it.  In the January commentary you mentioned that the ER &#8220;has only recently turned positive&#8221;.  This would mean, I would guess, that either EPS or analysts estimates were negative and have now turned positive.  I guess you&#8217;d have a problem if they were both negative!  <img src='http://pragcap.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>This brings me to my questions:  </p>
<p>- It looks like it is the slope that is most important &#8211; correct?<br />
- The ER seems to have been &#8220;bullish&#8221; starting at least in December and &#8220;missed&#8221; (probably too negative of a word here) the March low.  The indicator hinges on analyst numbers so I can see the ratio being useful in these earnings weeks, but I am trying to figure out how to interpret the ratio at other times?</p>
<p>Great job coming up with the index.  Thanks.</p>
<p>-tyler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: santo kuma</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-could-the-analysts-have-been-more-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-3655</link>
		<dc:creator>santo kuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6859#comment-3655</guid>
		<description>BTW, Could you teach us more about the philosophy of ER? I hope it is not proprietary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, Could you teach us more about the philosophy of ER? I hope it is not proprietary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: santo kuma</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/earnings-update-could-the-analysts-have-been-more-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-3654</link>
		<dc:creator>santo kuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6859#comment-3654</guid>
		<description>TPC

Good call abt the earlier &quot;dont short&quot; guidance! 

Nice work, keep it up! Thats why you see us frequenters coming back for more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TPC</p>
<p>Good call abt the earlier &#8220;dont short&#8221; guidance! </p>
<p>Nice work, keep it up! Thats why you see us frequenters coming back for more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

