Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

Felix Salmon is Right – Stocks Are Consistently Overhyped

Felix Salmon wrote a nice explanation to his 2010 video saying you should sell your stocks. Basically, he admits that he made a mistake. That’s a pretty unusual thing to see from a high profile pundit so kudos to Felix for that. But he also finishes his piece with a salient point:

I still think that the optimum stock allocation is much lower than most financial advisors would recommend.

I’m a financial advisor and I couldn’t agree more. After all, if you plug in Modern Portfolio Theory style thinking to most people’s risk profiles you almost invariably end up with a stock heavy portfolio. That’s a pretty incredible thing when you consider that the global financial asset portfolio (GFAP) of equities is about 45%, but the vast majority of people who are risk profiled by an advisor will end up with a stock heavy portfolio.

This is even more absurd when you think about the fact that the 60/40 stock/bond portfolio has become THE benchmark for the entire financial industry despite the fact that the GFAP is almost the exact opposite weighting.  How in the world can 60/40 be the benchmark in a world where we know, for a fact, that 45/55 is the actual outstanding market cap weighting of stocks and bonds?

I think the reason is simple. The idea of “investing” has been sold to people as some sort of high risk & high reward pursuit. So we inevitably end up thinking about “the stock market” when we think about asset allocation. In reality, we should be thinking about the full menu of options out there and they’re much more expansive than just stocks. We actually shouldn’t even think about “investing” as “investing”. We should think of it purely as an allocation of savings. But the allure of “market beating” returns and getting rich in the markets is too powerful to convince people to pursue a more pragmatic approach.

Anyhow, I could beat up on Modern Portfolio Theory all day long and I’ll spare you the regurgitation of many of the points that I regularly make here about it. But Felix is right – stocks are consistently overhyped. We don’t need opinions there. We just need to look at the actual markets for confirmation about that.