Home » Most Recent Stories, Special Reports

FUNDMENTALS DON’T MATTER UNTIL THEY DO

19 March 2010 by Cullen Roche 9 Comments

By Comstock Partners:

The market rallied when the FOMC said it would keep the Fed Funds rate at current levels for an extended period just as it rallied when it became likely that the EU would paper over (at least temporarily) the Greek financial crisis.  The market apparently continues to have great faith that the various central banks throughout the globe will continue to bailout and guarantee that they would never let any entity fail and would assure continued economic growth indefinitely.  In other words, what economists and strategists used to refer to as the “Greenspan put” has now essentially become the “Bernanke put”.   We at Comstock have no such conviction that piles of additional debt issued or assumed by governments can cure the problems that were brought on by too much debt in the first place.

In this connection the delusions and hopes associated with the current rally bear a lot of resemblance to the unwillingness of investors to recognize reality at the market tops of March 2000 and October 2007.  In the late 1990s and into early 2000 the market gave enormous valuations to tech stocks with no earnings and, in many instances, little or no sales as thousands of people with no market experience spent their time day trading their way to huge profits that evaporated, along with their initial capital, in the ensuing market carnage.

When the game ended with big losses and a potentially deep recession, the Fed stepped in by keeping interest rates at 1% for an extended period and encouraging, along with others, a massive boom in housing.  Despite warnings by reputable individuals such as Paul Volcker and by institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank, the stock market soared.

Even when the dangers of the housing boom started to become evident in the media and the industry began to weaken, the stock market surge continued unimpeded.  In August 2006 an article in Barron’s described in detail the number of new mortgages and home-equity loans that were interest-only, no-money-down and adjustable-rate. Other articles explained so-called “liar loans” whereby purchasers were able to get mortgages with no documentation of income or assets.  In the same period various mortgage lenders went public with their dire problems.  These companies included, among others, H&R Block, Impac Mortgag, Countrywide, Accredited Home Lenders and Washington Mutual.  During the following period revelations came out almost daily how mortgages were packaged and sold, sliced and diced and distributed all over the globe.  In June 2007 two big Bear Stearns hedge funds came close to collapse and still Wall Street didn’t get it.  The stock market kept rising into October as investors belittled the importance of subprime mortgages, and, in any event, assumed the Fed would take care of everything.

Now, once again the markets are assuming that central banks around the world will save the economy despite the severe problems that are known to all and despite the fact that the S&P 500 has already experienced two declines of more than 50% within the same decade.  The economic recovery remains extremely weak, plagued by consumer deleveraging, a weak labor market, tight credit, a hidden inventory of homes to be foreclosed, significant amounts of toxic debt still on the books of major financial institutions and the dire financial condition of state and local governments..  In addition there are the continuing problems of sovereign debt, the unsustainable boom in China and the threat of “beggar thy neighbor” policies as illustrated by the current trade and currency tensions between the U.S. and China.

Meanwhile, as in 2000 and 2007, the stock market is once again flying upward, feeding on its own momentum and the faith that governments will never let bad things happen.  The general feeling seems to be that fundamentals don’t really matter any more as long as the market is rising.   As past massive declines have proven, however, fundamentals don’t matter until they do.

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
  • Anonymous

    TPC, are you still long vix?

  • Tommy Vu

    Tech and Housing bubbles created productive assets, for awhile at least. Bernanke’s liquidity bubble created to stem the fallout of the housing bubble doesn’t. I see it as a bubble within a bubble. By not allowing the housing bubble to fully burst, Bernanke has enshrouded that bubble with another larger, liquidity bubble as he attempts to reflate the housing market. So, you have the housing bubble with a gash in it’s side letting all new attempts to reflate escape through the gash only to be contained by the liquidity bubble now enshrouding the housing bubble which then distorts, distends the liquidity bubble. Our masters are all in. It will either work spectaculary or fail spectaculary. There is no middle ground. Obama/Bernanke/Geithner/Summers give me no reason to believe they will be successful. Liquidity bubbles, raising the prices of non-productive assets, do not have the staying power of productive asset bubbling froths. Henry Liu laid out this scenario in 2006.

    • ATP

      Pets.com and houses are productive assets? Huh?

      • Tommy Vu

        Of course not. But one cannot argue intelligently that there were not many rewards from the investments in the Tech bubble.

  • B Ferro

    Interesting line….

    “Now, once again the markets are assuming that central banks around the world will save the economy despite the severe problems that are known to all…”

    If the problems are known to all, has the market not discounted them in already, potentially?

    Just food for thought

  • shrek

    Read Brian Sacks speach about the MBS program and what it was designed to do. Talk about a massive ponzi scheme that distorts almost every asset class on earth. Just becuase it lowers yields and gets more borrowing done doesnt mean it will fix anything. It hasnt created any productive capacity at all. And it keeps real wealth creators out because it fucks up prices and fundamentals for everything.

    No one at the Fed has any idea what they are doing or what the real problem is. The US and most of the west has an out of control leverage problem. When debt to gdp is a massive as it is, you will blow up. Now we have even more debt than before and even less chance of servicing it.

    • LZ

      They are not as stupid as many think. Actually, they are quite intelligent. They know what problem is and it is gonna blow up no matter what they do. But with power in their hands, they just made a choice of who are going to eat it. status quos, as long as possible, so they can keep the scheme of socializing risk and privatalizing gains going until wealth producers and public hand in their last coin.

      If people know what they know, lol… very scary.

      The men who slams plane into IRS and who shot people at pentagon are not idiots. They understand this scheme very well.

    • LZ

      The best way to rob public is to create a ponzi scheme, or you can call it zero sum game because it doesn’t produce anything. Just like a poker game, but in this game government are dealers and banks are players. of cause they collude. Every citizen is forced to play with banks otherwise will be penalized with zero interest. When everyone except banks go broke they will open another game, with even higher stakes. So we are going from stocks bubble to housing bubble back to stock bubbles, only to see bigger bubbles every time. looks to me it has no sign to end, especially most small players are so enjoyed playing and believe dealers and other players are absolutely honest, even they loss their a$$ every time.

      • ATP

        Agreed. Those of us who think logically and responsibly are most likely the patsies. Good gals/boys go to heaven but bad gals/boys have all the fun. I’m afraid the schemers will have the last laugh.