Home » Most Recent Stories, Strategy Lab

GOLDMAN SACHS ENTERS EARNINGS SEASON WITH AN AGGRESSIVE TRADE

8 October 2009 by Cullen Roche 3 Comments

Goldman Sachs is approaching earnings season in an aggressive fashion – they’re going for the high beta of high beta names: high growth in the BRIC countries.  Goldman recently issued a report recommending that investors overweight a basket of 50 companies in the Russell 1,000 with the highest sales exposure to the BRIC countries heading into this upcoming earnings season.  Goldman said:

We favor exposure to Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRICs) over developed markets given the significantly higher GDP growth outlook. We believe investors should use this basket to identify stocks with high exposure to emerging market growth. Long/short investors should consider buying this basket against the S&P 500 to gain exposure to higher growth in the BRICs countries versus slower growth in developed regions.

The performance during the last year speaks for itself.  YTD the portfolio us up 43% vs just 17% for the S&P 500.  A portfolio of BRIC revenue names outperformed the S&P 500 by 20% over the last 52 weeks.   Since inception the portfolio is up 27.7% vs. +7.7% for S&P 500.  Clearly, Goldman is onto something with the now infamously coined BRIC trade.

bric1

Goldman currently expects these companies to grow 2010 revenues by 9% and earnings by 14%.  The names below are Goldman’s favorites.  Presumably, the higher the BRIC based revenue the more suitable the name:

bric2

Of course, investors looking to outsmart Goldman at their own game might avoid picking individual stocks altogether.  The SPDR BRIC ETF has an expense ratio of just 0.4%, a yield of 3% and has outperformed the S&P 500 by 50% over the last year.  Beat Goldman at the BRIC game they invented.  Consider buying the index fund instead:

BIK

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
  • tyler cruickshank

    While I like the BIK ETF I’m not sure that it is at all like GS’ basket. GS is looking at US based companies while BIK are mainly BRIC based companies. All I’ve read about GS’ thoughts are what you have posted above, but maybe they prefer the “less risky” US based companies and a play off of earnings?

  • Rob

    Run your chart from May 1, 2008 to today and the SPX is a bit ahead of BIK. The starting point is critical to outperformance. Starting in March 2008 after BIK had fallen much further, BIK has outperformed SPX 2X.

  • Cullen Roche TPC

    Good point guys. I guess what I am saying with the BIK fund is that if you want direct exposure to the BRICs you might be better off just going straight to the source.

    Of course, as Rob pointed out, this comes with a much higher beta and the potential for a very bumpy ride….