GURU OUTLOOK: PAOLO PELLEGRINI
This week’s Guru Outlook brings you Paolo Pellegrini. Although he is not the most well known of investment gurus Pellegrini has built quite a name for himself in recent years. Before founding his own hedge fund PSQR (a play on PP Squared) Pellegrini was John Paulson’s right hand man at Paulson and Co (see Paulson’s guru outlook here & most recent strategy comments here). Of course, Paulson and Co. made waves during the sub-prime crisis when they made billions shorting the market during the crisis. Pellegrini was instrumental in devising the strategy. Like Paulson, however, Pellegrini wasn’t a one trick, short the market, pony. In 2009 he crushed the market with a 61.6% return in his fund after he made big bets on a rising oil market and a tanking treasury market.
So where does Pellegrini see the market going now? In a recent letter to shareholders he said:
“the structural problems that precipitated the Great Recession around the globe remain unresolved”
He says we are essentially papering over the problems with more debt. We are simply adding more debt to a debt-laden world while China adds more exports to a saturated market. He says the problems in Europe are a harbinger of these continuing issues. Thus far the massive stimulus has been successful in jumpstarting the global economy, but is nothing more than a temporary respite from the longer-term structural problems that remain.
Pellegrini’s favorite trades in 2010 are the following four:
- Short US fixed income
- Short US equities
- Short US dollar
- Long commodities
The short trade on fixed income is a reflection of the likelihood for higher yields as investors grow increasingly fearful of the U.S. as a steward of its debt. Pellegrini believes demand for treasuries will decrease in the coming years.
In terms of equities Pellegrini says valuations are becoming stretched as organic growth fails to match expectations. He also believes higher taxes could ultimately be a net negative for equities.
Pellegrini is short the dollar based on the expectation of more stimulus. He predicts that policymakers will come back to the taxpayer asking for another handout as they explain their first stimulus plan was not a failure, but simply too small. He says the dollar will “plunge” if this occurs.
The one sector of the market Pellegrini likes is commodities. He says they remain attractive long-term as China exports inflation and demand for hard assets remains high.
One of Pellegrini’s primary concerns is the stimulus based growth occurring in China. He says China is one of the greatest risks to the recovery. He says:
“I was in China late last year. One particularly enlightening meeting was with the top official of a major bank, who pointed to all the empty office buildings surrounding his own, observing that his country’s stimulus money would have been better spent paying people to stay home”
Pellegrini expects China’s CPI to exceed 5% in H1 2010 due to excessive demand from the stimulus programs. He says China will respond aggressively with policy measures throughout 2010. He expects the equity market to respond negatively. One of this favorite China investments is the Yuan. He is long the Yuan based on his “impossible trinity” trade:
“a country can control its interest rate, its exchange rate or its capital account – but not all three. If the US keeps interest rates low, the only way China can raise rates is by first addressing the currency undervaluation. Otherwise, it would just attract hot money inflows, as it did in 2006-2008. Indeed, it is our expectation the the experience of that period – when gradual CNY appreciation was chosen – will lead China’s policymakers to prefer a more aggressive, upfront, one-off revaluation this time around.”
In the US, Pellegrini says we are coming face-to-face with the critical structural problems. The end of the stimulus and the Fed’s programs will mark an economic top in Q1 2010 and set the stage for economic weakness in the latter half of 2010. He says the headwinds we face are likely to occur sooner rather than later:
“Eventually, there must be a reckoning. In our judgment, that day may be much sooner than the markets suggest.”



i will now be reading paulo……dead on
Wow, he actually makes sense. But all these trades he has while make sense have been dead wrong for a long time now. Obviuoslty, he has deeper pockets than any of us.
Having a position doesn’t mean that he has it panned out to trigger tomorrow. For example, I remember many buying curve caps almost five years out.
Still, it’s true PP talks about “sooner than later” whatever that means in his 2010 horizon. Perhaps all is set for late Q1 reversal as he points out, but there’s a margin of safety in the bets.
It’d be so nice to get the all the data on the timing and instruments, one could actually learn how it’s done, once one has the conviction.
good commentary, makes me think about what gross said about fixing a debt problem with more debt. gross’s point is that by replacing private debt with public debt, the sovereign (debt) will come to resemble the serf (credit debt).
with so much money to invest, i am sure gross would rather see a rising sovereign market, and i am sure he is negative on this development, again wearing sovereign debt buyer’s glasses.
but isn’t one effect of this development to benefit corporate debt and, by implication, equities. i can see the risk of this down the line, inflating prices of risk assets beyond reasonable values, but for the short term, isn’t this good for equities? shouldn’t you put the above commentary in an envelope that says read in 01/2011?
staying long (overweight financials), writing covered calls, puts on sterling and euro, short long treasuries
If the economy is going to weaken, according to Pelligrini, then to short bonds is a contradiction, imho.
For those of you who wanted to read Paolo’s entire commentary we have the full PSQR letter available here: http://www.marketfolly.com/2010/02/paolo-pellegrinis-psqr-capital-annual.html
Good summary TPC. The most interesting thing about PSQR is they essentially made all their money for ’09 in 1 month then took the rest of the year off to build up their organization and figure out their theses going forward.
Thanks for providing a link to the whole thing Jay.
now i know why paulson is doing stock picking….his macro guy left
Paulson’s always had equities in his portfolio as his background is in merger arbitrage. He ventured into the macro game with the housing bubble bet. And that was his first ever divergence away from his past core strategy of arbitrage.
It raises an interesting topic though – is Paulson the ultimate one hit wonder (albeit, a MIGHTY good one!)?
Paulson was a rather ho hum fund manager before this big bet. I wonder how much of it we can attribute to Pellegrini’s analysis? Now that Pellegrini is gone, does the one hit wonder return to his prior ho hum status or not?
Any thoughts Jay?
Many will label him a one-hit wonder certainly. It would be intriguing if his anti-dollar bet pans out as well with his gold fund. More than anything I found it very intriguing that he randomly diverged from his strategy. The way I understand it is that Paolo and Paulson both shared the idea but Pellegrini did most of the analytical work with charting and data.
Irregardless of whether or not Paulson is a ho-hum manager from here on out, he’s already won big as his management fee on multi-billions is huge. Not to mention performance fee on top of that.
Maybe he was just employing the wrong strategy all along and has found something he’s much better at. Wouldn’t be the first time a major hedgie has done that. Hard to forecast and unfortunately only time will tell here.
thanks to both of you TPC and MF for bringing PP to our attention.
“A key analyst alongside Paulson was Paolo Pellegrini. A failed Lazard banker with two divorces and zero net worth at the time he joined Paulson, Pellegrini had to make this last career chance work.
He lived in a one bedroom apartment up in Westchester and would arrive at work at 6:30 am in order to get the cheapest parking lot rate nearby. No one seemed to like him at first. He was a bit of a hot-head and talked too much. Yet, eventually he helped identify the housing bubble that Paulson would turn into a $16 billion winning trade for his firm and $4 billion for Paulson.”
http://breakoutperformance.blogspot.com/2009/11/lessons-of-john-paulson.html
I worked with Paolo Pellegrini at Lazard. Very intellectual but unexceptional. Surrounded by a lot of big deal guys, Rattner, Jacobs, even Rohatyn was around. Lazard at the time had quirkly tastes in how they hired. I think the media has missed this wonderful story–a true rags to riches story–in focusing on the media hound Paulson. Pellegrini is quite brilliant but Paulson only has the risk gene. While the two together was a great match I am not sure I would put my money with Paulson going forward. His outsized GLD bet is very odd — not in what it expresses (money printing) but the instrument itself is a dud. It’s like buying USO to express a belief in oil going up. Yeah, it went from 34 to 85 but USO has been stuck in the 29-39 range. I also think his outsized bet on BAC is odd. Sure, the government could bail them out when things fall apart again. Or not. We could get a radical (Ron Paul) in office who thinks companies who make terrible decisions should fail (of all bizarre things).
i don’t know, you can store your own gold like einhorn and pay retail for transtion costs, or buy gld and get economies of scale. are you saying etfs are only for the unwashed? i read PP’s piece and i find it not only illuminating, but also displaying an ego that was well under control. hubris is what gets most of these guys.
Nice summary and comments, thanks for sharing Edna.
I think a lot of gurus results are altered by changing of the supporting cast.
My 2 cents on Paulson says track record has to be a lot longer, but people are pulled like a magnet to get in on any applied field that shows positive polarity.
Don’t agree. The USD is only a short if you believe that the problems in the US are markedly worse than anywhere else. As we’ve seen recently with Greece and the UK, they aren’t, and since currency pairs are the proverbial zero-sum game, the USD can be expected to behave accordingly (i.e. not as weak as the doomsayers have predicted – note that its up 15% against the EUR in the last 4 months alone).
on US Treasury yields, I accept that there’s a lot of new issuance due but with inflation low (deflation anyone) the likelihood of a yield boosting interest rate hike seems slim for this year at least. That said I do prefer emerging market debt to that of developed economy sovereigns.
The most recent US results season seems to have been at the upper end of expectations as has been the case out here in Asia, where I live.
I accept that ther are plenty of reasons to be cautious, but a lot of bears seems to be keen on talking their own book, with little success so far. They must be finding current markets rather painful.
The summary is a little misleading regarding Pellegrini’s calls on US equities and the US dollar. If you read the full letter (courtesy of http://www.marketfolly.com/2010/02/paolo-pellegrinis-psqr-capital-annual.html), you’ll see that his calls are more conditional on government action.
From page 9, second paragraph:
“US monetary and fiscal policy in 2010 is still the big unknown. Although the Fed is currently on a path of ending its quantitative easing program by the end of March, we still see a significant chance the Fed will be forced to continue easing at some point. Similarly, the pressure is on the Obama administration to deliver another jobs stimulus package. The source of the pressure on both the Fed and the US government stems from the continued high rate of US unemployment”
…
“If we conclude, based on unemployment levels, other economic indicators and political conditions, that the US is indeed likely to extend or expand its quantitative easing and fiscal stimulus measures, we will short the US dollar aggressively. If we conclude otherwise, we will short US financial assets. The Massachusets senatorial election results suggest the risks are currently skewed toward the latter outcome”
And from page 5, under Short US dollar section:
“Watch out when the recovery falters and policymakers come back and tell us that the problem was not an ill-conceived strategy, in the form of the stimulus package; the problem was that we didn’t do enough of it and, therefore, should do more. If so, expect the dollar to plunge.”