Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Chart Of The DayMost Recent Stories

HIGH BETA STOCKS NOW RISKIER THAN BEFORE CRASH OF 2008

The outperformance of high risk assets has been notable this year.  The Russell 2,000 small cap index is now up an astonishing 25% from the February lows and up 15% in just the first four months of 2010.  Meanwhile, the S&P 500 is up 15% from the February low and up 8% year to date.  The discrepancy between small caps or higher beta stocks hasn’t been this notable since just before the market crash of 2008 when investors were complacently pouring into small caps and ignoring various market risks.  Over the following 6 months the Russell 2,000 proceeded to lose 55% while the S&P lost 45%.

Disclosure: Author is short Russell 2,000 and long S&P 500.

Comments are closed.