Home » Most Recent Stories

HINDENBURG OMEN: “SAVAGE DOWNTURN AHEAD”?

13 August 2010 by Cullen Roche 12 Comments

A menacing sounding technical set-up is forecasting a potential equity market crash.  This technical pattern, known as the Hindenburg Omen (named after the famous zeppellin that crashed in 1937) develops when all 5 of the following criteria are met:

  1. That the daily number of NYSE new 52 Week Highs and the daily number of new 52 Week Lows must both be greater than 2.2 percent of total NYSE issues traded that day.
  2. That the smaller of these numbers is greater than or equal to 69 (68.772 is 2.2% of 3126). This is not a rule but more like a checksum. This condition is a function of the 2.2% of the total issues.
  3. That the NYSE 10 Week moving average is rising.
  4. That the McClellan Oscillator is negative on that same day.
  5. That new 52 Week Highs cannot be more than twice the new 52 Week Lows (however it is fine for new 52 Week Lows to be more than double new 52 Week Highs). This condition is absolutely mandatory.

Yesterday, all 5 criteria were met.  It’s an unusual event and Albert Edwards, the eternally bearish analyst at Societe Generale, says stocks are “tottering on the edge”:

“Equities are tottering on the edge as increasingly recessionary data becomes apparent. It would not take much to tip them over that edge.  A savage equity downturn is imminent.”

According to Wikipedia a stock market crash has always been preceded by a Hindenburg Omen and stocks are generally down in the following months:

“Looking back at historical data, the probability of a move greater than 5% to the downside after a confirmed Hindenburg Omen was 77%, and usually takes place within the next forty-days.

The probability of a panic sellout was 41% and the probability of a major stock market crash was 24%.

However, the occurrence of a confirmed Hindenburg Omen does not necessarily mean that the stock market will go down, although every NYSE crash since 1985 has been preceded by a Hindenburg Omen.”

It might sound like another silly technical indicator, but with a track record like that it might be worth noting….

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
  • jt26

    Even if this is serious, it’s funny. I literally can’t stop laughing, but I’m not sure why. Got the giggles, I guess.

  • Marxist_MMTer Captain America

    77% chance of a lower stock market? I like those odds.

    • ChickenLittle

      “move greater than 5% to the downside after a confirmed Hindenburg Omen was 77%”

      Key word being confirmed.

  • DJ

    “Looking back at historical data, the probability of a move greater than 5% to the downside after a confirmed Hindenburg Omen was 77%, and usually takes place within the next forty-days.”

    That (5%) really does categorize as savage? Come on, one can do better, Prechter was saying that it was looking like August 1987. Now, that would be savage. We’ve already had one flash crash this year as well.

    What’s the term I’m looking for? Curve fitting?

    Btw, not discounting the possibility of a decline/crash – the market’s do look very fragile but the indicator is crap.

  • 3421138532110

    Quality……not quantity please :)

    • SteveS

      FACTOIDS

      Last confirmed H.Omen was June 2008. I think they are in effect for 4-6 months

      Prechter thinks this is a setup like 1987.
      Russel and others think 2008.

      I still think this looks like 2007 – Aug 16 spike low to DJ 12500, Oct 10 14200.
      Most bull phases end in a blowoff (think techs 1999). Can Obama and banksters create one last short-covering rally pre-election as payback for $100s billions in bailouts?

  • billw

    c’mon people he’s just put the nail in the coffin for you. With literally 20-30 major indicators forecasting a major downturn ahead for the last month what more do you expect them to do; tell you the exact day and minute. We have never had that kind of information from indicators before, that is why they are called indicators. With so many of them making the same call you pretty much know its time to prepare for a major downturn.

  • Also from Wikipedia “One off Hindenburg Omen signals are always considered unconfirmed as the indicator has a high false alarm rate. A train of 3 to 5 coupled Hindenburg Omens are preferred by analysts wherever possible.”

    The people I know that use this indicator best insist on multiple “sightings” within a one a one month period.

  • TK7936

    This sounds like someone discovered a UFO

  • Fudge

    Hindenburg Omen, Yes.
    Confirmed: Not Yet.

    From the wikipedia article:
    “A confirmed Hindenburg Omen occurs if a second (or more) Hindenburg Omen signals occur during a 36-day period from the first signal.”

    So far we have the 1st signal only (Aug 12th).

    But I think a 5% (at least) drop is coming even without a confirmation. That would put this drop in the 100%-77% = 23% of cases. The exception proving the rule :)

    The Hindenburg Omen is simply a very obscure way to say internals are very weak in the face of increasing price. But we know this already. There’s no need for the signal.

  • GreenAB

    the HO is making rounds on the blogosphere.
    sadly no one takes a look behind the criteria.

    the setup was designed to measure a sharply diverging market with a relatively high number of NYSE stocks making new highs and new lows at the same time.

    but when you look at thursday´s data you will find, that
    -the new high data contained 26 issues from canadian exchanges (see stockcharts.com)
    -the overwhelming majority of the NYSE highs were BOND ETFs!!

    substract those issues from the “official reading” and you´re way below the required 75 threshold.