Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

How Much Can the Fed Raise Rates?

Larry Summers has a very good piece today in the FT on the irrationality of raising rates and the limits of monetary policy in the current environment.  I largely agree with his views as I hashed out in September.  But the Summers piece got me thinking about the precise limits of Fed policy here.  Summers says the limit is about 100 bps.  I think he’s probably pretty darn close.

Historically, the economy does not perform well in an environment in which the yield curve inverts.  This makes sense because the credit markets tighten up in an environment in which it is more expensive to borrow short than lend long.  This is one reason why Central Bank policy can be very effective during a tightening phase.  The Central Bank can close the credit pipes very quickly if it so desires by making it unprofitable to be a bank.  I’ve never understood why Central Banks willingly invert yield curves, but they do and it almost always leads to a bad outcome.

If we look at the current yield curve the Fed has very little wriggle room:

10_2s

The hope, of course, is that by raising short rates the Fed will be front running a stronger economy and rising long rates. There are some signs that inflation could come out of hiding in the next 18 months, but I would be very surprised if we saw a substantial increase in long rates in the coming couple of years just because there are too many disinflationary macro headwinds.  This means that the Fed is likely looking at a flat or flatter yield curve in the future.  They have about 125 bps of wriggle room at present before they invert the yield curve.

This means the risk/reward of a Fed tightening are very low at this point in the business cycle.  If they tighten too much too fast the credit markets will likely slow even further than they already have.  This will be explicit and dangerous tightening of policy.  The Fed is hoping the long end of the curve reacts to stronger economic growth, potentially rising inflation and higher demand for credit.  And while I am not necessarily bearish about growth prospects in the coming 18 months I do think we’re unnecessarily trying to thread the needle with a rate hike here.  The Fed has very little room for error.  They should proceed with extreme caution.