HOW TO AVOID GETTING YOUR “FACE RIPPED OFF” (STRONG LANGUAGE – NSFW)
“‘If you fuckin’ buy this bond in a fuckin’ trade, you’re fuckin’ fucked.’ And “If you don’t pay fuckin’ attention to the fuckin’ two year, you get your fuckin’ face ripped off.’ Noun, verb, adjective. Fucker, fuck, fucking. No part of speech was spared. His world was filled with copulating inanimate objects and people getting their faces ripped off.”
-Michael Lewis, Liar’s Poker
It’s probably the greatest worry of any investor – losing an incredible amount of money in a very short period. As it might be assumed, getting your “face ripped off” or “blowing up” or any of the other lovely synonyms for losing a boatload of money on Wall Street, is not pleasant. It can be career ending (or in John Meriweather’s case, career STARTING). It can be devastating at a personal and psychological level. But it happens quite regularly. Despite seeing these occurrences frequently on Wall Street it doesn’t have to happen. As I’ve previously described, markets are highly complex non-linear dynamical systems. They can’t necessarily be predicted, but that doesn’t mean that black swans aren’t unavoidable.
I recently came across the last monthly update from Ebullio Capital Management. In case you’re not familiar with them or haven’t heard the story, they just got their faces ripped off. The letter begins like this:
“February 2010 was the worst month in the history of the Ebullio Commodity Fund and we regret to report a return of -86.25 pct for the month, which brings our total return for the year to -95.83 pct and to -89.63 pct since inception.”

Did this have to happen? Did they have to lose 86% in one month? Definitely not. But we can all learn from their loss. Attached are a few tips to help avoid getting your “face ripped off”.
1) Understand what you’re investing in. This might seem obvious, but if you’re not 100% certain how an instrument works then avoid it. Warren Buffett infamously said that he only invests in things he can understand. He avoided the entire Nasdaq debacle using this simple rule.
2) Avoid leverage. With proper allocation you can create plenty of beta within a portfolio without being leveraged up. Leverage is almost always a recipe for disaster if you are playing with high(er) beta instruments. My rule: don’t make bets with money that isn’t yours.
3) Never let more than 20% of your portfolio put 80% of your portfolio at risk. Risk management, money management, position sizing and true diversification are paramount in any portfolio plan. If a few positions are determining the majority of your performance then you’re not properly balanced and that means you’re taking more risk than is necessary.



Got my face ripped off twice. First time was not too quickly… lasted a few months, lost 98%. Started over.
Last time was in 2006, everybody was making huge money, I lost 70% in one month. Vowed that it would never happen again. So far, it has not, and I honestly don’t think it will because I take less risk. Your three points are right on the mark; follow that advice, and your chance of a wipe out are greatly reduced.
This is sad stuff – not to mention this fund is still getting paid for going bust.
Two words: Stop Loss
This can be a GTC or a Ghost stop but people don’t use this nearly enough. It forces you to pre-define your loss limits.
However, I do think everyone has to go bust at least once and preferably early on. That’s the only way to learn. Chalk it up as the cost of an education in the markets. BUT, this lesson should not cost more than an entire education. Moreover, it can take years to recover from (if ever). It’s also important to not try to “make it back” – this will make things just get uglier. You start trading on emotions rather than trading where there is a trade.
First time Jesse Livermore busted, he was a kid and lost just about all the money he had (a few bucks). He forced the worst punishment on himself he could think of: going to the exchange every day, all day for 3 weeks and NOT trading but just watching – and learning. He tripled is money on his next bet because he waited for the right time to trade and based on his view of a trend. Too bad he didn’t do this later in life…
TPC, I just have to say it because it’s buggin me – I don’t think the word “dynamical” exists
Otherwise, good article
Thanks. Losing money is a great lesson. Some people just keep doing it over and over!
You made me look it up. I thought I was using a made up word for a second:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamical_system
Hey, you know, I’ll be the first to admit when I am wrong and this is definitely the case. It just sounds so wrong. But I learned something new today, thanks!
Agreed with the losing over and over but in fact, when I was studying Cognitive Science I realized that this takes some real effort to overcome. Turns out that the thing that makes the rat press the level for the food pellet is not when he gets food all the time and obviously not when he gets shocked all the time but rather when he is sometimes shocked and sometimes gets food. That’s exactly how the market works (and all gambling): Unsophisticated people make money once in a while but lose just as frequently or more so (or have drawdowns so large that they exceed profits) – so they keep coming back for more. Same experiment, different mammal, same result.
Couldn’t agree more, I’m always amazed by the way stops are not used by so-called professional traders.
Yeah, I find it astounding as well – especially with the advent of Ghost trailing stops and such at just about every retail broker.
I can understand pro’s not wanting to post on the specialist open book (or electronic exchanges) but that’s exactly what ghost stops are for.
there needs to be a “not safe for work” statement before you click on the link! i do not find the language offensive but many employers and employees will think differently.