Home » Most Recent Stories

HPQ EARNINGS

18 February 2009 by Cullen Roche 2 Comments

HP just reported their Q1 results and the numbers aren’t pretty.   The press release is dressed up to make the quarter look decent.  “1% revenue growth”, “non-GAAP operating profit up 10%”, etc.  But let’s look at the real numbers:

Net revenue was essentially flat.  But the expected revenues for Q1 were  $31.93B – a colossal miss on the top line for a company of this size.    If we drop down their EPS was actually in-line with estimates (due to some financial engineering).  But a closer look reveals a 2% lower tax rate on a year over year basis and a 7.2% lower share count.   Back out the EDS acquisition (+$4.7B in revenues) on an apples to apples comparison and this quarter was substantially weaker than it appears.  While services (EDS) are fairly strong the rest of their businesses are declining.  The bottom line lies (and is manipulated by buybacks and other accounting shenanigans), the top line doesn’t.  The enormous revenue miss is all I need to know about this company in terms of what the market expects from them.  I can’t think of a single good reason to own HPQ over QQQQ at this time.  Their income statement is clearly in decline.   The added company risk is not worth it.

hpeps1Update (7:45PM) : Upon futher inspection the revenues are actually much weaker than the numbers appear.  The EDS acquisition actually makes the quarter look relatively strong at first glance, but an apples to apples comparison shows that EDS added nearly $5B in revenues to the Service segment.  Meanwhile, HP’s other segments were all down substantially.  Notably PSG and IPG were down close to 19% each and accounted for over 50% of total revenues.

hpqfollwup

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
  • Anthony Hoskins

    First look gives us an impression that HP Services is doing very well. But let's take closer look: it is not that HP Services it was before, it is HP Services + EDS. Some data:
    2009 Q1, HPS+EDS
    Rev: 8,746
    OP: 1,123

    2007 Q1
    EDS Rev: 5,224
    EDS OP: 701
    HPS Rev: approx 4,000
    HPS NP: approx 500

    Direct sum for two organizations for 2007 Q1 is Rev=9,224; NP=1,201

    Now compare to Q1 2009 numbers. Are numbers increased YoY?

  • Cullen Roche TPC

    Yes, it looks like much of the EDS drop in revenue was due to currency translation, but I haven't run the exact figures. Revenues at the other segments looked weak as well. Thanks for breaking it down further.