Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas.
Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Although the short the dollar trade might be a bit stretched in the short term, it is not hard to see where it could go a lot higher in the long run.
The monetary base is not only in a vertical ascent, but also without precedence. We have never seen anything like this. The monetary base is essentially the Federal Reserve Bank’s currency and reserves. Now, with an expansion like this you would think inflation would be rearing its ugly head, but as hedge fund manager John Paulson points out “that’s because this base money has not yet been lent out and multiplied throughout the economy. Yet the monetary base and money supply are highly correlated, “almost 1-to-1 between the two.”
So what does this mean? I think it means that soon or a later the money supply will follow, and if money supply grows faster than the economy, that will create inflation. I don’t know how you feel but it looks to me to be practically impossible that the economy could outgrow that hideous spike in the monetary base over the last several years.
TPC: This is an interesting trend that I think will have profound impacts come late 2010/2011 (if unemployment continues to be high and current policies fail to improve the economy)
What are you thoughts on this? Do you think that this will result in political deadlock and thus no passage of policy that could be beneficial to the nation when it needs it most? Or shall I say a failure of the democratic state to act (an extreme result)?
It’s spelled: d-e-s-c-e-n-t.
A new editor in chief at TPC? You’re hired! Thanks for catching that. There’s nothing decent about the dollars decline….
Although the short the dollar trade might be a bit stretched in the short term, it is not hard to see where it could go a lot higher in the long run.
The monetary base is not only in a vertical ascent, but also without precedence. We have never seen anything like this. The monetary base is essentially the Federal Reserve Bank’s currency and reserves. Now, with an expansion like this you would think inflation would be rearing its ugly head, but as hedge fund manager John Paulson points out “that’s because this base money has not yet been lent out and multiplied throughout the economy. Yet the monetary base and money supply are highly correlated, “almost 1-to-1 between the two.”
So what does this mean? I think it means that soon or a later the money supply will follow, and if money supply grows faster than the economy, that will create inflation. I don’t know how you feel but it looks to me to be practically impossible that the economy could outgrow that hideous spike in the monetary base over the last several years.
TPC: This is an interesting trend that I think will have profound impacts come late 2010/2011 (if unemployment continues to be high and current policies fail to improve the economy)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a8v_AvouiIjQ&pos=9
What are you thoughts on this? Do you think that this will result in political deadlock and thus no passage of policy that could be beneficial to the nation when it needs it most? Or shall I say a failure of the democratic state to act (an extreme result)?