By Lancer Roberts, StreetTalk Advisors
My friend Cullen Roche recently posted a note entitle “The Long View On Stocks” which discussed a recent research note out of BofAML on the long term returns of stocks since 1824. The core point of the analysis was that if someone would have invested just $1 in 1824 it would be worth $4,225,000 today with dividends reinvested. The piece went on to note the major secular bull market returns but failed to not the secular bear returns. Cullen picked up on the key issue with this analysis, which I have consistently railed against for the last decade, by jokingly stating:
“Now, if we could only solve that whole, not being alive for 189 years, problem…..”
Cullen is absolutely right. The problem with all of these “invest for the long term” analysis is that it assumes that you will live forever. Unfortunately, cloning, freezing, stasis, DNA manipulation. Robotics or vampirism have not yet provided viable solutions to immortality. For most individuals the reality is that by the time that they achieve a level of income and stability to begin actually saving and investing for retirement – they have, on average, about 40 years of investible time horizon before they expire.
When considering the impact of 15-18 year secular market cycles, as shown in the chart below, it really becomes much more important in determining the “WHEN” to invest as much as “WHAT” to invest in.
I have prepared two different charts to show you the impact of investing revolving around 40 year time spans. I used an initial investment of $1000 at the beginning of each decade and analyzed the capital appreciation for the ensuing 40 year period. In this regard we can garner a clearer picture about the impact of both secular bull and bear market cycles on the total investment returns. [Note: The data below uses Shiller's price data on a nominal basis and is based on monthly capital appreciation only.]
The first chart shows the average annual return for each starting decade.
The next chart shows the capital appreciation of a $1000 initial investment.
As you can see it makes a huge difference on the ending result depending on “WHEN” you start. If you started investing during the 50′s and 60′s then you were lucky enough to capture the raging “bull market” of the 80′s and 90′s which offset the secular bear market of the 70′s. However, if it started in 1990, so far, results haven’t been all that great as the secular bear market of the 21st century has slowly chipped away at the gains of the 90′s.
One very important thing to be noted here, which I have discussed in the past, is that valuations have been a key driver of these 40 year cycles. The best 40 year returns came from when the starting point in valuations were below 10x trailing reported earnings. Today, at over 19x trailing reported earnings (the only valuation measure that is historically consistent),it suggests that the next 40 years will produce substandard rates of return.
Of course, it really just depends on how long you think you will live.
Read Some Related Articles
All-Time Highs in the Stock Market are Perfectly Normal
“If you think the market’s “too high” wait ’til you see it 20 years from now.” – Nick Murray ...read more
AI, Robotics, and the Future of Jobs
This is a good piece sent courtesy of John Mauldin. It goes well with this video which is a pretty scary perspective of what the robots could do ...read more
Citi: Beware Rising HY Spreads
Worried about a potential recession and another big market decline? Analysts at Citi say a good way to track this risk is to look at the HY bond spreads. Specifically, ...read more
What Backs the Value of Money?
I was reading this very good piece by Matthew Klein at FT Alphaville when I came across this line: "The only kinds of money that reliably hold their value are the ...read more