<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MEREDITH WHITNEY IS NOW CALLING FOR A DOUBLE DIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/meredith-whitney-is-now-calling-for-a-double-dip/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/meredith-whitney-is-now-calling-for-a-double-dip</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/meredith-whitney-is-now-calling-for-a-double-dip/comment-page-1#comment-9325</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=12873#comment-9325</guid>
		<description>Fantastic post Edna, agree with a lot of your points.  Overall it seems rather ridiculous that the carnage experienced a year ago, worst since the Great Depression, will work itself out in a year, the sheer audacity of people.  We are in stagnation and will be for some time to come.  We have gone a few generations to not know if we would have a job, food in our stomach or a roof over our head.  Times will get much more dire before they get better. My guess is 2018 will be like 1982 and the start of a new era bull market.  Until then sideways to down and we will eventually take out Marchs lows of 2009 by a substantial margin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic post Edna, agree with a lot of your points.  Overall it seems rather ridiculous that the carnage experienced a year ago, worst since the Great Depression, will work itself out in a year, the sheer audacity of people.  We are in stagnation and will be for some time to come.  We have gone a few generations to not know if we would have a job, food in our stomach or a roof over our head.  Times will get much more dire before they get better. My guess is 2018 will be like 1982 and the start of a new era bull market.  Until then sideways to down and we will eventually take out Marchs lows of 2009 by a substantial margin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rickintoronto</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/meredith-whitney-is-now-calling-for-a-double-dip/comment-page-1#comment-9279</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickintoronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=12873#comment-9279</guid>
		<description>If the fed was not buying U.S. treasuries (directly and indirectly)interest rates in the U.S. would have already exploded.  I understand that the fed is buying up to at least 50% of U.S. treasuries. This is basically a collapse of the U.S. dollar.   


The day of reckoning is coming.  The world will only let the U.S. do this for so long. Already countries are making deals with other countries to accept their national currencies and not the U.S. dollar in trade.  This will be like a virus and spread all over the world.
The fed may be able to purchase as many T-bills as it wants with the tap of a keyboard but there is no way it can step up and prop up the dollar when foreigners start to repatriate the currency.  The flood of returning money will be unmanageable!

I was wondering how Ron Paul managed to get the fed audit legislation passed...I think the powers that be let it get passed so that the fed would get audited and become the scapegoat for the current U.S. financial mess.
After the audit and shocked revelations, U.S. will default on their debt saying that it was the fed&#039;s fault (not a U.S. government entity).  The U.S. government will plead ignorance.  Then the world will be informed that the fed&#039;s U.S. dollar (fed-dollar) is not worth the paper it is printed on and a new currency will be born.  Before that day, interest rates will sky-rocket as the U.S. tries to attract any foreign buyers it can to the U.S. dollar.

The U.S. Ponzi scheme will be over.

PS: Remember Bernanke&#039;s warning that if audited the U.S would collapse.
 
R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the fed was not buying U.S. treasuries (directly and indirectly)interest rates in the U.S. would have already exploded.  I understand that the fed is buying up to at least 50% of U.S. treasuries. This is basically a collapse of the U.S. dollar.   </p>
<p>The day of reckoning is coming.  The world will only let the U.S. do this for so long. Already countries are making deals with other countries to accept their national currencies and not the U.S. dollar in trade.  This will be like a virus and spread all over the world.<br />
The fed may be able to purchase as many T-bills as it wants with the tap of a keyboard but there is no way it can step up and prop up the dollar when foreigners start to repatriate the currency.  The flood of returning money will be unmanageable!</p>
<p>I was wondering how Ron Paul managed to get the fed audit legislation passed&#8230;I think the powers that be let it get passed so that the fed would get audited and become the scapegoat for the current U.S. financial mess.<br />
After the audit and shocked revelations, U.S. will default on their debt saying that it was the fed&#8217;s fault (not a U.S. government entity).  The U.S. government will plead ignorance.  Then the world will be informed that the fed&#8217;s U.S. dollar (fed-dollar) is not worth the paper it is printed on and a new currency will be born.  Before that day, interest rates will sky-rocket as the U.S. tries to attract any foreign buyers it can to the U.S. dollar.</p>
<p>The U.S. Ponzi scheme will be over.</p>
<p>PS: Remember Bernanke&#8217;s warning that if audited the U.S would collapse.</p>
<p>R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/meredith-whitney-is-now-calling-for-a-double-dip/comment-page-1#comment-9264</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=12873#comment-9264</guid>
		<description>For more data on where this market might be going, check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truthsavvy.com/content/what-does-return-dow-10000-really-mean&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What Does The Return Of Dow 10,000 Really Mean?&lt;/a&gt; at truthsavvy.com. It ends with this: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;A 50% retracement for stock indices was a good probability once the Fed’s intention to flood Wall Street with money was clearly evident. Now, the loose money environment creates a coin flip chance or less for this retracement to stretch toward 75% (around Dow 11,700 if one uses DJIA 13,500 in December 2007 as the market “norm” before the big sell-off). While a 75% retracement would take stock indices to the level of consolidation preceding the October 2008 plunge, such a retracement would increase the likelihood of a very difficult to contain sell-off when inflation appears and interest rates rise. Those who want to get their money out of the Wall Street system before rules constrain capital egress should not wait too long.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more data on where this market might be going, check out <a href="http://www.truthsavvy.com/content/what-does-return-dow-10000-really-mean" rel="nofollow">What Does The Return Of Dow 10,000 Really Mean?</a> at truthsavvy.com. It ends with this: </p>
<blockquote><p>A 50% retracement for stock indices was a good probability once the Fed’s intention to flood Wall Street with money was clearly evident. Now, the loose money environment creates a coin flip chance or less for this retracement to stretch toward 75% (around Dow 11,700 if one uses DJIA 13,500 in December 2007 as the market “norm” before the big sell-off). While a 75% retracement would take stock indices to the level of consolidation preceding the October 2008 plunge, such a retracement would increase the likelihood of a very difficult to contain sell-off when inflation appears and interest rates rise. Those who want to get their money out of the Wall Street system before rules constrain capital egress should not wait too long.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jt26</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/meredith-whitney-is-now-calling-for-a-double-dip/comment-page-1#comment-9115</link>
		<dc:creator>jt26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=12873#comment-9115</guid>
		<description>This next bubble cycle will be very different then the last 2 (98-2000, 2006-2008) - the US is in horrible shape this time.  It will come from an unexpected corner - its all about fear propagation.  Just looking at the last few cycles - Thai Baht, fraud, short ban of 20 stocks, ... who would have guessed those?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This next bubble cycle will be very different then the last 2 (98-2000, 2006-2008) &#8211; the US is in horrible shape this time.  It will come from an unexpected corner &#8211; its all about fear propagation.  Just looking at the last few cycles &#8211; Thai Baht, fraud, short ban of 20 stocks, &#8230; who would have guessed those?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/meredith-whitney-is-now-calling-for-a-double-dip/comment-page-1#comment-9111</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=12873#comment-9111</guid>
		<description>I think Whitney need to be more articulate.She also fails to understand that Bernake is committed to fostering a recovery in the economy so I do not see where she concludes that mortgage rates are going up substantially.I don&#039;t see the fed 
doing that.Nor does any evidence in the real world bear Whitney out that lending standards by the banks are aS loose as they were in the past.

Whitney had her day in the sun she needs to do some new research and not just rehash the same old story of 13 months ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Whitney need to be more articulate.She also fails to understand that Bernake is committed to fostering a recovery in the economy so I do not see where she concludes that mortgage rates are going up substantially.I don&#8217;t see the fed<br />
doing that.Nor does any evidence in the real world bear Whitney out that lending standards by the banks are aS loose as they were in the past.</p>
<p>Whitney had her day in the sun she needs to do some new research and not just rehash the same old story of 13 months ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/meredith-whitney-is-now-calling-for-a-double-dip/comment-page-1#comment-9092</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=12873#comment-9092</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing Grand Super Cycle.  There are charts at the bottom of the ocean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing Grand Super Cycle.  There are charts at the bottom of the ocean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grand Supercycle</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/meredith-whitney-is-now-calling-for-a-double-dip/comment-page-1#comment-9065</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Supercycle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=12873#comment-9065</guid>
		<description>Just a heads up guys !

I am still expecting a USD rally - YES A RALLY.

Daily charts of key stock indices are still giving bearish warnings.

Is the bear market rally ending ?

I post my analysis at this forum:
www.zerohedge.com/forum/market-outlook-0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a heads up guys !</p>
<p>I am still expecting a USD rally &#8211; YES A RALLY.</p>
<p>Daily charts of key stock indices are still giving bearish warnings.</p>
<p>Is the bear market rally ending ?</p>
<p>I post my analysis at this forum:<br />
<a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/forum/market-outlook-0" rel="nofollow">http://www.zerohedge.com/forum/market-outlook-0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/meredith-whitney-is-now-calling-for-a-double-dip/comment-page-1#comment-9045</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=12873#comment-9045</guid>
		<description>I think we&#039;re Japan for the next 5 years....Lots of bull &amp; bear markets within one long nowhere market....We have to deal with the problem of debt before the foundation can be laid for a sustainable bull market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;re Japan for the next 5 years&#8230;.Lots of bull &#038; bear markets within one long nowhere market&#8230;.We have to deal with the problem of debt before the foundation can be laid for a sustainable bull market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edna Rider</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/meredith-whitney-is-now-calling-for-a-double-dip/comment-page-1#comment-9044</link>
		<dc:creator>Edna Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=12873#comment-9044</guid>
		<description>TPC,

IMO, either you are in the double-dip camp or you believe in the recovery (however gradual).  The economy (and especially the market) won&#039;t undergo a period of no change.  In fact Rosie has loudly and frequently said the market has priced in a strong recovery.  If we don&#039;t get it the market will go down and the economy will follow (reflexivity, Soros).  I doubt the banks will every &quot;come clean.&quot;  The political class won&#039;t allow it, as it would expose how stupid and complicit they are.  That means banks will gradually be bailed out at a 20% per year clip for 5 years.  This year, contrary to the &quot;nothing has changed&quot; argument, I would guess the banking sector has sold to the Fed 20% of its toxic assets.  This likely won&#039;t increase in velocity any time soon because the taxpayers are finally realizing they&#039;ve been had, but the banks will be bailed out.  As Buffett says, &quot;they&#039;ll earn their way out.&quot;  What interests me more than anything, and I think people lose track of it because of the &quot;liquidity&quot; and &quot;inflation is coming, just watch gold&quot; arguments, is what the real demand story is for industrial commodities:  oil (inventory very high), natural gas (this market is dead, utterly, with too much production--I was in the oil business and they simply produce until they fail), steel (no demand, see Nucor&#039;s CEO), aluminum (see Norsk Hydro&#039;s CEO comments about the insane inventory levels of aluminum), and the list goes on and on.  We have too much of everything.  Using debt we expanded capacity in everything, including loans.  Even with C4C we can&#039;t get annualized car demand above 70% of its peak.  Without C4C it will likely drop to 50%.  I am in the camp that says in 10 years we will be nearly where we were in 2007.  The only remedy is a major crash that flushes out all the capacity.  It will need to start in Asia (China).  If that occurs expect lots of civil unrest, lots of mini wars, and ultimately a lot better world in 2020.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TPC,</p>
<p>IMO, either you are in the double-dip camp or you believe in the recovery (however gradual).  The economy (and especially the market) won&#8217;t undergo a period of no change.  In fact Rosie has loudly and frequently said the market has priced in a strong recovery.  If we don&#8217;t get it the market will go down and the economy will follow (reflexivity, Soros).  I doubt the banks will every &#8220;come clean.&#8221;  The political class won&#8217;t allow it, as it would expose how stupid and complicit they are.  That means banks will gradually be bailed out at a 20% per year clip for 5 years.  This year, contrary to the &#8220;nothing has changed&#8221; argument, I would guess the banking sector has sold to the Fed 20% of its toxic assets.  This likely won&#8217;t increase in velocity any time soon because the taxpayers are finally realizing they&#8217;ve been had, but the banks will be bailed out.  As Buffett says, &#8220;they&#8217;ll earn their way out.&#8221;  What interests me more than anything, and I think people lose track of it because of the &#8220;liquidity&#8221; and &#8220;inflation is coming, just watch gold&#8221; arguments, is what the real demand story is for industrial commodities:  oil (inventory very high), natural gas (this market is dead, utterly, with too much production&#8211;I was in the oil business and they simply produce until they fail), steel (no demand, see Nucor&#8217;s CEO), aluminum (see Norsk Hydro&#8217;s CEO comments about the insane inventory levels of aluminum), and the list goes on and on.  We have too much of everything.  Using debt we expanded capacity in everything, including loans.  Even with C4C we can&#8217;t get annualized car demand above 70% of its peak.  Without C4C it will likely drop to 50%.  I am in the camp that says in 10 years we will be nearly where we were in 2007.  The only remedy is a major crash that flushes out all the capacity.  It will need to start in Asia (China).  If that occurs expect lots of civil unrest, lots of mini wars, and ultimately a lot better world in 2020.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mc</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/meredith-whitney-is-now-calling-for-a-double-dip/comment-page-1#comment-9042</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=12873#comment-9042</guid>
		<description>Sorry -- meant that to be directed to svg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8212; meant that to be directed to svg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

