Home » Most Recent Stories

NEXT: SIDEWAYS TO DOWN?

3 May 2009 by Cullen Roche 1 Comment

Great insights here from this weekends Barrons and Mike Santoli:

The idea of a bear-market overshoot phase — when the market goes beyond pricing in weakening economic conditions and turns to liquidation and panic — was first invoked here in July and most recently in October, when the Standard & Poor’s 500 was almost exactly at its current level.

The relentless climb of 30% since the March 9 low has recouped the ground ceded in the disorderly, deleveraging, Depression-recalling, government-is-clueless selloffs of the fall and early this year.

On the weekend ahead of the March 9 low, this column hesitantly suggested, “With the indexes stretched so far below their trend, a bounce or better could happen on any excuse, or none. Investors are so hostile to any and all government efforts, and so blind to real improvements in credit markets, that any less-than-terrible news would probably draw bids.”

This surge has been better, and more substantial, than a mere bounce. It has indeed been accompanied by plenty of less-than-terrible economic news. The rally has also outgained the initial phase of the 1938 rally I and others have cited repeatedly, due to its similarities with the 2008-2009 experience. If there remains relevance in the ’38 analogy — a powerful rally off historically depressed levels with the world still a mess — then we should be in for a sideways-to-down phase at minimum here.

There remains skepticism toward the upside fun, especially among professional investors who haven’t owned enough of what has led this move, have little company-level conviction in the fundamentals and seem to want a chance to buy them lower. This is a net positive.

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
  • RudyInNY

    “There remains skepticism toward the upside fun, especially among professional investors who haven’t owned enough of what has led this move, have little company-level conviction in the fundamentals and seem to want a chance to buy them lower.”
    I am not a skeptic, but with the government getting involved in every aspect of life, is it possible that :
    1. Government encouraged/forced the TARP receivers to put a floor under the market by allowing them to use the money received to buy equities ?
    2. Now, the govt doesn't want the market to go too high either. They have so much of debt to issue and they don't want to crowd out the private buyers from the govt treasury market. They have to keep the fear/risk level optimal for their own benefit.