<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NON-FARM PAYROLLS PLUMMET, GOLDMAN SACHS WINS AGAIN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/non-farm-payrolls-plummet-goldman-sachs-wins-again/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/non-farm-payrolls-plummet-goldman-sachs-wins-again</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:32:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/non-farm-payrolls-plummet-goldman-sachs-wins-again/comment-page-1#comment-6637</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=10025#comment-6637</guid>
		<description>I am guessing if we closed under 1020, then it will be more pressure on the down turn.
I am really curious on how GS get the number pretty close.  One reason I ask about the expectation for next quarter is because they failed miserably on this NFP numbers.  
From the other post.  
&quot;That’s because at -263,000 on nonfarm payrolls, instead of the -175,000 print that was widely expected, we actually saw sequential deterioration for the first time since May as the August decline was -201,000 (though revised from -216,000; July was revised lower to -304,000 from -276,000)&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am guessing if we closed under 1020, then it will be more pressure on the down turn.<br />
I am really curious on how GS get the number pretty close.  One reason I ask about the expectation for next quarter is because they failed miserably on this NFP numbers.<br />
From the other post.<br />
&#8220;That’s because at -263,000 on nonfarm payrolls, instead of the -175,000 print that was widely expected, we actually saw sequential deterioration for the first time since May as the August decline was -201,000 (though revised from -216,000; July was revised lower to -304,000 from -276,000)&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jt26</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/non-farm-payrolls-plummet-goldman-sachs-wins-again/comment-page-1#comment-6633</link>
		<dc:creator>jt26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=10025#comment-6633</guid>
		<description>GS may be short knowing that there could be a lot of selling pressure due to all the prop trading wanting to lock-in their bonus&#039;s for the year after such big gains.  That&#039;s why they so urgently paid back their TARP.  They&#039;ll probably engineer a nice 15% correction to the end of November, and get a nice little bonus on THEIR bonus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GS may be short knowing that there could be a lot of selling pressure due to all the prop trading wanting to lock-in their bonus&#8217;s for the year after such big gains.  That&#8217;s why they so urgently paid back their TARP.  They&#8217;ll probably engineer a nice 15% correction to the end of November, and get a nice little bonus on THEIR bonus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/non-farm-payrolls-plummet-goldman-sachs-wins-again/comment-page-1#comment-6630</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=10025#comment-6630</guid>
		<description>My guess is there will be another 2% up day soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is there will be another 2% up day soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/non-farm-payrolls-plummet-goldman-sachs-wins-again/comment-page-1#comment-6628</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=10025#comment-6628</guid>
		<description>Yesterday was a brutal day no matter how you dice it.  What&#039;s still up for debate is why we were up 2% on Monday....I&#039;d love an answer to that one....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday was a brutal day no matter how you dice it.  What&#8217;s still up for debate is why we were up 2% on Monday&#8230;.I&#8217;d love an answer to that one&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/non-farm-payrolls-plummet-goldman-sachs-wins-again/comment-page-1#comment-6627</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert in Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=10025#comment-6627</guid>
		<description>Nice catch over at ZH:

Submitted by Nic Lenoir of ICAP

&lt;b&gt;The usual suspects&lt;b&gt; [ZH: emphasis ours] did a great job at managing the market expectation yesterday, which is why we dipped ahead of the number, and shorts took profit following the release. &lt;b&gt;Congress&#039;s Finance Committee get the numbers at 2PM the day prior, why shouldn&#039;t the right institutional traders get them too?&lt;b&gt; Obviously this softened the blow delivered by the news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice catch over at ZH:</p>
<p>Submitted by Nic Lenoir of ICAP</p>
<p><b>The usual suspects</b><b> [ZH: emphasis ours] did a great job at managing the market expectation yesterday, which is why we dipped ahead of the number, and shorts took profit following the release. </b><b>Congress&#8217;s Finance Committee get the numbers at 2PM the day prior, why shouldn&#8217;t the right institutional traders get them too?</b><b> Obviously this softened the blow delivered by the news.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/non-farm-payrolls-plummet-goldman-sachs-wins-again/comment-page-1#comment-6626</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=10025#comment-6626</guid>
		<description>Henry,

I&#039;ll have a formal earnings report analysis out next week.  I haven&#039;t finished crunching the numbers yet....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have a formal earnings report analysis out next week.  I haven&#8217;t finished crunching the numbers yet&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/non-farm-payrolls-plummet-goldman-sachs-wins-again/comment-page-1#comment-6625</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=10025#comment-6625</guid>
		<description>TPC, what do you think of the analysts estimate for 3rd quarter?  any chance for better than estimate earning still?  It seems the expectation is gradually moving up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TPC, what do you think of the analysts estimate for 3rd quarter?  any chance for better than estimate earning still?  It seems the expectation is gradually moving up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/non-farm-payrolls-plummet-goldman-sachs-wins-again/comment-page-1#comment-6619</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=10025#comment-6619</guid>
		<description>Factory orders also fell...the markets aren&#039;t reacting too much to the news.  It seems there are dip buyers and short covering.  I heard from TA people that there has to be a gap filled to 1015 and then we go back up a few %&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Factory orders also fell&#8230;the markets aren&#8217;t reacting too much to the news.  It seems there are dip buyers and short covering.  I heard from TA people that there has to be a gap filled to 1015 and then we go back up a few %&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

