ON THE IMPORTANCE OF UNDERSTANDING TREND FOLLOWING
Michael Covel, the author of Trend Following, was kind enough to ask me to write the foreword for his new book, The Little Book of Trading. I was excited to do it. Michael’s first book, Trend Following, was one of the first books that made me sit up and think outside the box and say: “hmmm there are other strategies besides all that stuff Wall Street throws in our face all day”. It got me thinking like an entrepreneur. Like I was running my portfolio like a business and not some cookie cutter “strategy” that may or may not work for me, but was guaranteed to generate commissions for my broker.
Investing just isn’t as simple as the Wall Street machine wants you to believe. As regular readers know, I believe investors have to be very methodical and flexible in their approach. Investors have to be able to apply the current market environment to a personal specific strategic approach – we’re all different and that strategy is likely to differ for all investors. The bottom line is, no one size fits all and while we’ve been sold “buy and hold” or this and that strategy, the truth is that the only approach that works is the one that conforms to your personal needs and is flexible enough to change over time to the current market environment.
Anyhow, this isn’t a commercial. I don’t do book reviews on the site for a reason (because I am not in the business of selling you stuff I don’t believe in 100%), but I truly believe Trend Following is an integral part of understanding the investment world and provides very valuable insights into any investment approach. Trend Following is no holy grail, but it is an important piece of solving the investment puzzle.
Trend Following – it sounds so simple doesn’t it? As the great Dennis Gartman of The Gartman Letter often likes to say: “if the chart is moving from the bottom left to the top right then I like it”. And to the untrained eye, that’s all Trend Following is. It’s identifying a trend and riding it. And as the famous saying goes: “the trend is your friend…until it ends”. And that’s where Trend Following adds so much value. Trend Following is not just about identifying great investments. It’s about using rules and techniques to manage the risks associated with these investments. What appears like a very simple strategy at first glance is actually a sophisticated, multi-dimensional and vital technique utilized by successful investors all over the world.
I should be clear that I am not a pure Trend Follower. I use a multi-strategy approach primarily due to my belief that no two market environments are ever the same and that markets are highly inefficient. What works in one bull market or bear market will not necessarily work in the next bull and bear market. This is why trading requires a great deal of flexibility and an ability to conform and adapt to new environments. At the core of my work is risk management and the establishment of a systematic approach. Trend Following has been absolutely vital in helping me develop the foundation of my investment strategies.
When I graduated from college with a degree in finance I was your typical hungry young investor. But I was lost. And so I did what most investors do and I began reading the works of those who had already succeeded in the business before me. I printed out every shareholder letter by Warren Buffett, I read all of the standard books from “A Random Walk Down Wall Street” to “One Up on Wall Street” to “The Intelligent Investor”. And then one day my father gave me a book called “Trend Following”. It didn’t look like anything fancy at first glance, but the powerful message conveyed in the book changed the way I viewed investing forever.
You see, Trend Following isn’t just drawing a line on a chart and hoping it continues from the bottom left to the top right. It isn’t about trying to convince you that there is some holy grail approach that will succeed in all markets. Trend Following is about studying the history of market movements, creating a game plan, having rules, learning how to apply those rules, understanding money management and utilizing a risk management approach. It isn’t about using all the failed techniques that the Wall Street establishment has sold to the small investor for so long. Trend Following is about thinking outside the box and understanding that the techniques of Trend Followers are applicable to all markets and all trading strategies. You don’t have to agree with the strictly technical analysis aspect of Trend Following to know that the techniques applied by Trend Followers are absolutely vital components in any good investor’s success story.
One of the more important aspects of Trend Following is that its users understand the importance of psychology in markets. I like to say that a market is the summation of the decisions of its participants. Markets are inefficient because the participants are inefficient. Thus, the participant with superior emotional control has a decisive advantage. As Michael says:
“Trend trading is not a Holy Grail. It is not some passing fad or hyped-up secret black box either. Beyond the mere rules, the human element is core to the strategy. It takes discipline and emotional control to stick with trend trading through the inevitable market ups and downs. Keep in mind though, Trend Followers expect ups and downs. They are planned for in advance.”
This irrationality was on full display in 2008. At the beginning of 2008, before one of the greatest periods of wealth destruction that the world has ever seen, the average Wall Street analyst had a “sell rating” on just 5% of the stocks they covered. They recommended a “buy” or “hold” on the other 95%. Wall Street doesn’t prepare you to understand when to sell. You see, Wall Street is always thinking of new ways to get you to buy or hold their new products. Like a car salesman, it’s difficult to make money if you tell everyone who walks onto the lot that they shouldn’t buy. Trend Following closes the loop by not only helping you decipher the right times to buy, but also by helping you to manage risks, develop a systematic approach and identify when to sell. And the results speak for themselves. While the average US equity investor lost 50% of their money, Trend Followers crushed the S&P 500 in 2008 because they had pre-established risk management structures in their portfolios.
According to ancient proverb, “failure to plan, is planning for failure”. Trend Followers succeed because they have implemented an investment approach that focuses on risk management and a strict adherence to rules. And while you don’t need to be a Trend Follower to succeed in the investment world, you certainly need to understand the importance of risk management, the establishment of rules and planning in advance. If not, you are destined to fail. And Michael Covel’s Little Book of Trading is exactly that – a must read guide to help you succeed in the shark infested waters of the investment world.






Congrats on the foreword Cullen and good write-up. Thanks for passing it along.
” Trend Following is about studying the history of market movements, creating a game plan, having rules, learning how to apply those rules, understanding money management and utilizing a risk management approach.”
100% agree.
Dear Cullen,
I read Trend Following after I hqad read Covell’s second book, The Complete Turtle Trader. What he wrote about Richard Dennis and Bill Eckardt changed my trading life forever. The inferences between the lines, the wisdom in a few words that I overlooked until the third or fourth reading is a revelation. Like “Stop looking at the Financial News! Start keeping track of the open, high, low, close of each market you are tracking. That is the key data you need to make all of your trading decisions.” So simple, I’ve heard it before, but when it came fom Richard Dennis it finally rang a bell in my head that led to me devising indicators that I have never seen in more than 100 tech analysis books I have read. They form the backbone of my trading system, as so much of Dennis’s philosophy does.
But when he said “enter at random, and follow your rules! It’s the exit that counts, not the entry!”; I saw this as the greatest challenge to human nature. Here lies the heart of the trading difficulties. What is it you need to develop to keep you in the trend following trade, until as Jesse Livermore said, it has played out in full! Perfecting this keeps me challenged all day.
If it wasn’t for Michael Covell, my trading life would have been far less satisfying and profitable.
I do most of my trading in my 401k and IRA accounts. I buy and hold in my ‘trading’ account. Cuts down the red tape and provides long term cap gains. Conservative stocks like resources/utilities are good for trend following. Cheasapeak had a good 6 month run a few years ago. Nisource(NI)is another one. Look at the five year chart on Nisource:
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=NI+Interactive#symbol=NI;range=5y
“I use a multi-strategy approach … What works in one bull market or bear market will not necessarily work in the next …”
TPC, in terms of maintaining a trading system, how often do you update your algo? Do you wait until the algo hits a rough patch, or market/macro action seems distinctly unusual (like your comment on overriding your recent buy signal)?
It seems trend following has been gaining momentum in recent press releases, or at least more people are starting to implement technicals with fundamentals. The problem that we see is two fold. First, do you act in a contrarian manner as soon as you see momentum slipping or the trend starting to wane? Or, do you trade after a trend has been established? Second, some of the research by Faber (Missing 10 Best and Worst Market Days) and others would indicate that entry into a market after an upward trend has been established causes you to miss some of the large upside gains (after you’ve participated in a portion of the downside losses). It would appear that trend following would “average” returns, but it would yield much higher risk-adjusted-returns relative to other strategies?
Well done CR-
In the spirit of trends…we have mentioned the end of Golds run here. We could not help but notice the 91 point reversal yesterday. And there is now a significant bearish bias for Gold.
The crowded trade with a do nothing Jackson Hole has the makings of a why did I buy GLD again? What is the purpose of my GLD purchase?(because it Gold it just goes up) I think many will soon be lookng back on the folly of the current bullish rhetoric being printed today on the yellow metal.
No trend lasts forever, trees do not grow to the sky, and nothing gold can stay.
The trend is your friend until it stops. It’s high time to find out if you have the skills to determine if your trend just stopped yesterday..
VII-
Using standard RSI indicators, GLD was oversold since 8/2/11 in its most recent price action upward. The problem with GLD is that it reacts like a twitchy finger on a trigger. Usually any panic regarding European woes or even US economic slowdown can cause an immediate reversal of the trend these days. It’s currently so high off from it’s long term averages, it has a long way to go down as it potentially reverts to the mean (the sustained price action way above the means could also be indicative of a bubble build up).
As one of my favorite actors is known to say….
“…My man”…Denzel Washington.
Where have you been Fundoffuns. Yes I agree. We have a bunch of fun other data to support our POP goes the bubble thesis. But with out getting into a bunch of rhetoric I like to post what we actually do not what I think or did not do.
To that..we still own GLD- My mechanism is to sell it when I buy SPY…
To that end…we think the market cap of SPY to GLD was also a signficant event that we will look back on as another sign of the Popping of the Gold Pimple.
I was baptized in the church of Modern Portfolio Theory- So while I know longer practice that religion that kills wealth I do have some roots there still. I do believe in diversification….so for us…we still own GLD not as a trade but to reduce our risk overall. But…we will be selling soon.
Good to hear from you FundofFuns..maybe you’ve been here awhile but it’s a pleasure meeting you. Take care…good post.
VII, you know I like your comments here. Pragmatic and action (not opinion) oriented with lots of interesting data points to back it up.
My question to you on the ostensible “popping” of the gold bubble is as follows: At what price, in your mind, did gold begin its parabolic, blow-off top rise and when did this happen?
Those two pieces of info seem critical. In my mind, when I look at the parabolic blow-offs other major secular bubble bulls had, such as the Nikkei and Nasdaq, a few things come to mind that I have yet to see in gold:
1) Multiple parabolic moves higher in the context of one larger parabolic move with no consolidation points. So far, the only parabolic move I can see on the gold chart is the one we put in over the past six months with the move to $1900 from $1500 (again, no consolidation).
2) The parabolic phase for the Nikkei and the Nasdaq began when each index broke out above a multi-year upward trending technical channel. Gold just hit the top of its channel and has yet to break above it. To even begin a parabolic move, one would think that a major technical barrier, such as a multi-year channel, would have to be broken out of, suggesting something had “changed” (i.e., a parabolic phase had begun). Until that happens, one has to just assume gold remains in a strong multi-year up-trend and the parabolic phase has not yet happened.
Lastly, and this is purely intuitive, gold effectively began its secular bull move in the early part of the last decade when equities were peaking on a secular basis. Therefore, if you believe that the SPX remains in a secular bear market and has material downside left in it, it is tough to think that one of the most negatively correlated assets with the SPX over the past decade, that being gold, had finished its own secular bull market. Until equities bottom on a secular basis, I would think gold would have failed to top on a secular basis…
Just some thoughts…
2)
I dollar cost averaged out of my “trading” gold and invested those proceeds into S&P and cash. I left the party too early at 1700/1800ish so missed the last blow off, but I still have a stake in gold (held for many years) and don’t plan to sell until I think this bull has run its course. Gold looks to be at a point like Aug to Oct 1998 on the Nasdaq where we start a severe correction and consolidation but do not harm the long term trend.
B Ferro-
You son of a Btch. I was trying to hollar at you back in June and July. I needed your wisdom. I always get excited when I see your name here.
Reading your posts and no nonsence approach(I’m 80% nonsence but still manage to get things done)I’m more than thrilled we get to have this conversation(thanks cullen for bringing us together)
Ok- I’d like to bring forth evidence that is part of this part but only relevant after the pop…not to spend too much time on this but everyone wants gold and can not see a reason it could go down. that is the short version. While not a timing tool it is part of what is needed. So where here but how much longer.
The reversal yesterday looking back 30 years reveals a significant bearish bias for the next 3 months.
The technical wave pattern has now subdivided yet agains so that there are terminal 5 wave structures at 3 degrees of trend(monthly, daily, and intraday)
The Gold run started August 1999 has lasted 12 years and prior to today was up 670%.
Now I am looking at a chart we have that shows NDX, SPX, and Gold current. They are identical. in fct the moveup is larger in Gold than the other two..
BUT…NDX % return was 2863% starting in Oct 1990…and Nikkei was 747% starting in November 1977 and THE ONE MANY LOOK AT GOLDS MOVE STARTING IN 1980 WAS UP A TOTAL OF 2315%.
So..let me be crystal clear so not to confuse anyone and to state in advance what I think. I won’t politic my calls so I can hedge my future contributions. I’m either right, wrong, or as you say…”I call an audible”.
I THINK and am investing as follows:
I see a correction between August 10th and October at the latest. 1700-2100.
But I think the ultimate death…and I don’t mean buy the dips etc. but true death of everyone who owns GOLD…will be q4 of 2012 at around 2750. That is where…Monex lays off my friends, the ETFs go before a senate hearing and become questioned, the reversal is so strong and the selling so quick(like a 45 year old virgin given 5 minutes with Kobe Tai) and Gold DIES.
I see about a 10%-12% correction setting up the final wave before it dies.
Also…golds consolidation based on the charts we have shows sideways consolidation from OCTOBER 2009 to January of 2011. Similar to NDX, and SPX.
Too your point about SPX and GLD non-correlation. I guess it lines up with my view that. We will be buying SPY ETF soon into year end rally and gold will correct during that time. but we do see 2012 very challenging for stocks. So Gold should do well and when the S&P bottoms around 800-950(wide channel I just gave) I guess that is when one would ultimatley sell gold and buy stocks long.
So your spot on. I frankly…missed this in my thinking. Like leaving your cell phone which you need at home and you figure it out 30 minutes later on the 405 in traffic(you can’t go back.) I missed left your astute observations at home. thanks for reminding me.
Good luck B Ferro….I mentioned were heading into the big black nasty hole where the blood sucking squids live…were buying the Financial ETF here into the year end. Right now were in no wheres land on stuff.
WoW VII!
That’s pretty heavy technical support, and I like the analysis and study examining the historical market positioning. Really impressive; much better and more thought out than some of the crap I’ve read about 14 out of 15 (2008 being the exception) prior market drops of 6% have yielded subsequent years of higher SPX values and therefore this past 16th data point would support market pricing at 1400+ next year… really???
Ok, that makes more sense. I thought you had called an absolute top in gold in one of your earlier posts but it looks like you think that has yet to happen. That’s where my head is, but my thought is that you get to $4250-$4500 before you top. In my mind, when I look at the $GOLD chart, I see the recent $1900 high being analogous to 97/98 in the NDX and 87 in the Nikkei; that is where both of those indexes broke their multi-year channel to the upside and began their parabolas. From that point both increased by ~125% to their ultimate highs or 2.25x, implying the price level I outlined on gold.
Surprised you think 800-900 is the ultimate bottom on the SPX; if I run a simple trend-line on the weekly chart across the 98 LTCM panic bottom, the 02 bottom and the 09 bottom I get something closer to 550-650 (all depends on timing; as time elapses the trend line continues to work lower and to the right of the screen). Either way, I can’t for the life of me fathom why a trend-line which has been a market for such incredibly important milestone bottoms would fail to mark what is likely to be “the” bottom (i.e., secular and ultimate bottom) for the SPX in a few years…
B se below I resounded to you…sorry I didn’t reply properly
Cullen – Congratulations on the foreword! As a novice, I haven’t read any of Covel’s books. Would you recommend just the latest or would there be value in reading one or more of his past books too? Thx.
Does it seem like the gold bubble is going to be popping soon? Or is it going to keep going up as long as there’s so much uncertainty out there?
Hi Cullen-
I just watched this teacher on youtube talking about qe and how the money is disbursed. I am not sure if I understand the whole thing, as I thought the banks don’t use the qe money to lend out and it is in their reserves. Is this guy correct or is he telling giving his students wrong information. Thanks in advance..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzIq_T3lId0&feature=player_embedded#!
Reserves at the Fed went up by almost exactly $600 billion between the start and end of QEII. I don’t have anything to listen to the video with, but them’s the facts.
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fredgraph.png?g=1ME
The portfolio rebalancing effect is psychological. Remember, the monetary effects from QE2 are asset swaps. So, the Fed isn’t increasing the money supply per se. What portfolio managers decide to do is at their discretion. I don’t reject the fact that PM’s do irrational things as a result of QE so yes, some of what this video says, is almost certainly true.
Thank you for the response.
What trend following signals are working best for readers and what are your best indicators. SMA’s. Demark, RSI’s, Fib, waves,etc?
Cullen, you are the biggest charalatan on the internet.
Very well thought out. Mature. Factual. Nearly brilliant. Where can we find more of this sort of commentary? Thanks.
B- sorry… No……I agree with you.
Ok..so I’ll have to elaborate….
I see bear markets lasting several years on avg. 16 years…. So yes I see a1982 moment some time down the road.
I see 2012-21013 giving a bottom around my call… 850 ish.
We will go long there.
I have no clue what happens to get lower…but I agree with you.
This book is very much like his previous ones, very generic about trend trading with no insight into the nuts and bolts….
Having said that, he’s trying to make a buck and I keep buying them, so I guess I’m the sucker still looking for new answers from the same guy in a book without having to pay a fortune for his program.
No doubt the theory is a breath of fresh air and a diversion from the norm, but if you are looking for a book to teach you the how to, this isn’t it.
Having said that, if anyone here can recommend a book / author / site that does get into specifics, please post.