The nonsense regarding the world’s greatest monetary non-event just continues to spiral out of control. Last week it was Glenn Beck pretending to know something about the monetary system and economics. This week it is Sarah Palin. In a talk today Mrs. Palin went on a politically motivated rant about government intervention and “money printing”:
“I’m deeply concerned about the Federal Reserve’s plans to buy up anywhere from $600 billion to as much as $1 trillion of government securities. The technical term for it is “quantitative easing.” It means our government is pumping money into the banking system by buying up treasury bonds. And where, you may ask, are we getting the money to pay for all this? We’re printing it out of thin air.
The Fed hopes doing this may buy us a little temporary economic growth by supplying banks with extra cash which they could then lend out to businesses. But it’s far from certain this will even work. After all, the problem isn’t that banks don’t have enough cash on hand – it’s that they don’t want to lend it out, because they don’t trust the current economic climate.
And if it doesn’t work, what do we do then? Print even more money? What’s the end game here? Where will all this money printing on an unprecedented scale take us? Do we have any guarantees that QE2 won’t be followed by QE3, 4, and 5, until eventually – inevitably – no one will want to buy our debt anymore? What happens if the Fed becomes not just the buyer of last resort, but the buyer of only resort?”
Glenn Beck made equally irresponsible comments last week. Why these people feel as though they are qualified to discuss monetary operations is beyond me. It would be like me walking into the Kennedy Center and telling the National Symphony Orchestra that they are playing the music all wrong (and I have not one ounce of musical talent in my entire body).
I won’t repeat the entire argument I have consistently made in recent weeks because I fear readers might bludgeon me with my keyboard, but let’s reiterate a few things:
- QE is NOT money printing. They are adding reserves to the banking sector and removing government bonds. Mr. Bernanke has explicitly stated this:
“Now, what these reserves are is essentially deposits that commercial banks hold with the Fed, so sometimes you hear the Fed is printing money, that’s not really happening, the amount of cash in circulation is not changing. What’s happening is that banks are holding more and more reserves with the Fed.”
- QE is NOT adding net new financial assets to the private sector. They are merely swapping assets – assets that were already in the private sector!
- QE is NOT inherently inflationary. It does not add to the currency in circulation. It does not make banks more capable of lending.
The misinformation regarding QE has caused severe market distortions in recent weeks as investors misinterpret the effects of QE. The one thing I agree with Mr. Beck and Mrs. Palin about is that QE is a bad idea, though I disagree with them for vastly differing reasons. Spreading fears about “money printing” and big government intervention are not only misguided and irresponsible, but extremely harmful to the country.
Read Some Related Articles on Pragmatic Capitalism -
2 Bullish Macro Indicators
Sometimes it's easiest to understand the big picture with the simplest indicators. And two of the more trust ones in the macro arsenal are the PMI reports and the weekly ...read more
Q&A - Ask Me Anything
Since I am trying out the site without comments I figure the least I can do is open things up to a Q&A more often. Feel free to have at ...read more
Is Wealth and Income Inequality Inevitable in a Capitalist System?
Good question here from the forum today: "Is wealth and income inequality inevitable in a capitalist system?" I discuss this a bit in my new book, which, in my opinion, is a ...read more
This Commonly Referenced USD Purchasing Power Chart is Useless
You've almost certainly seen the chart below over the years - it shows the purchasing power of the US Dollar over time. It looks terrifying. And it's constantly cited by hyperinflationists ...read more