Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas.
Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
Onlooker
I'm not sure how to react to this really. First of all I don't know what the methodology is. Second of all it only goes back to '87, encompassing for the most part the great bull market. I'm inclined to think that, just like a lot of other theses and models that are leading some to think that this rally is the start of a new bull, the conditions that are/will drive things going forward are much different than anything that existed in this period of time.
Show me how this model accurately predicted a recovery from a huge debt bubble crash and the consequent debt deflation and 300+ debt/GDP, etc., and maybe I'd give it some credibility here.
We're certainly trying to do what we did in '02 to bring a corpse of an economy to life, but this time it is different, in many regards.
I don't disagree at all. As far as timing the market in the near term there is not much to get from this market, but if you have a longer timeframe there is an argument to be made for buying here based on this chart. I try to provide a broad investment perspective knowing that all people have different time frames, different asset focuses, etc.
Onlooker, that should clear up some of your thoughts as well….Thanks for kind words Larry.
Good day, The above indicator is very interesting. Please advise where I can read more about it and may be get that for use ? Thank you in advance, Kind regads, Andrew
I'm not sure how to react to this really. First of all I don't know what the methodology is. Second of all it only goes back to '87, encompassing for the most part the great bull market. I'm inclined to think that, just like a lot of other theses and models that are leading some to think that this rally is the start of a new bull, the conditions that are/will drive things going forward are much different than anything that existed in this period of time.
Show me how this model accurately predicted a recovery from a huge debt bubble crash and the consequent debt deflation and 300+ debt/GDP, etc., and maybe I'd give it some credibility here.
We're certainly trying to do what we did in '02 to bring a corpse of an economy to life, but this time it is different, in many regards.
Any thoughts TPC?
What would it look like for '29-'32? (rhetorical question – I'm sure they don't have data for then for this model).
great great blog, but this chart means nothing, news in a vacuum
I don't disagree at all. As far as timing the market in the near term there is not much to get from this market, but if you have a longer timeframe there is an argument to be made for buying here based on this chart. I try to provide a broad investment perspective knowing that all people have different time frames, different asset focuses, etc.
Onlooker, that should clear up some of your thoughts as well….Thanks for kind words Larry.
This looks like a bunch of voodoo to me.
Good day,
The above indicator is very interesting.
Please advise where I can read more about it and may be get that for use ?
Thank you in advance,
Kind regads,
Andrew