PERSISTENCE, PERSISTENCE, PERSISTENCE
The following research comes to us courtesy of Annaly Capital Management:
It is very hard to presume any sense of accuracy when answering the question, “What will market conditions be in the future?” There is the rub, because the future is what matters most to an investor. Investors, however, know the past and present cold. Thus, it is somewhat more comforting to ask the same question in this way: “How long will current conditions persist?”
The Federal Reserve understands this problem, and nodded toward it yet again in their January 27 FOMC statement by maintaining their commitment to keep the federal funds “exceptionally low…for an extended period.” Presumably, this means the current rate at 0% to 0.25%. That still leaves some uncertainty on the table, but it provides a semblance of forecastable conditions for one point on the government yield curve. What about the rest of the government curve? And the curve for other asset classes? There is no such guidance from the Fed, because the fed funds rate is all it controls (please, no angry blog comments about the market manipulation resulting from the Fed’s active involvement in the financing markets and open market purchase operations).
For answers to those unanswerable questions, we have to fall back on the past and present. The two stacked graphs below try to show the relative yield at two points on the government yield curve (Fed funds and the 10 year Treasury) and the mortgage finance curve (the current coupon mortgage-backed security and 3-month LIBOR). The vertical red lines indicate the beginning of a Fed easing cycle. After the Fed started easing in June 1989, the government curve steepened to more than 300 basis points and stayed that way through 1995, six years later. After the January 2001 easing campaign got underway, the government curve stayed steep for about five years. The mortgage finance curve is similar (although it never inverted). Today, we are a little over two years into the easing campaign. If history is a guide-and there is, of course, no guarantee that it will be-these curves will likely remain steep for some time.


Source: Annaly
——————————————————————————————————————————————————
The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial product, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of firms affiliated with the author(s). The author(s) may or may not have a position in any security referenced herein and may or may not seek to do business with one another or companies mentioned via this website. Any action that you take as a result of information or analysis on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.
A brief note on comments – The increase in users in recent months has resulted in an increase in unproductive comments. Any user who engages in the use of racial epithets or uses the comment section as a place to insult other users will be banned from the site. The comment section is welcome to all readers who are interested in asking pertinent questions and/or engaging in thoughtful, intelligent, and productive debate. In short, just be nice. Thanks.
Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.
More on this topic (What's this?)Mortgage REIT Annaly Downgraded by Piper Jaffray (REIT Wrecks, 1/9/10)Alford: What Kind of Science Should Economics Be When It Grows Up? (naked capitalism, 8/13/10)Summer Rerun: “Why America Will Need Some Elements of a Welfare State” (naked capitalism, 7/19/10)Fed: Recession ‘Very Likely Over’, but Threats Remain (Contrarian Profits, 9/16/09)


