<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PPIP: DEAD ON ARRIVAL?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/ppip-dead-on-arrival/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/ppip-dead-on-arrival</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RudyInNY</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/ppip-dead-on-arrival/comment-page-1#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>RudyInNY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/ppip-dead-on-arrival#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>The earlier M2M rule change is the reason why PPIP won&#039;t work. This rule change converted the bank&#039;s toxic assets to legacy assets. Suddenly, their cap ratios fell in line with fed&#039;s requirements. Now, the only thing the banks would be interested is to use PPIP to put tax payer money against any possible losses and keep the profits to themselves. One more case of &quot;Privatize the profits, socialize the loss&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The earlier M2M rule change is the reason why PPIP won&#39;t work. This rule change converted the bank&#39;s toxic assets to legacy assets. Suddenly, their cap ratios fell in line with fed&#39;s requirements. Now, the only thing the banks would be interested is to use PPIP to put tax payer money against any possible losses and keep the profits to themselves. One more case of &#8220;Privatize the profits, socialize the loss&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

