Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

Quite the QE Conundrum….

One thing I’ve continually cited throughout Quantitative Easing is how the evidence between stock prices and QE is actually much less reliable than most presume.  The case I keep pointing to is Europe where the ECB’s balance sheet expansion has coincided with many markets crashing (like the periphery stock markets).  Nevermind that inflation has remained low.  There is this perpetual psychological belief that QE can cause stock prices to levitate – as if nothing else is needed to support prices.  That is probably true to some degree, but I am not so sure the effect is as powerful as some people seem to believe.

The reason I bring this up is because Scott Krisiloff has a nice post showing exactly what we’re talking about here:

ECB-Balance-Sheet-Contracting

The ECB has a shrinkage problem and a stock market expansion.  Which obviously goes against all of the myths that QE’s “tapering” will necessarily coincide with declining stock prices.  It all makes me wonder if this isn’t just a big case of confirmation bias.  If you can’t find inflation in consumer prices then the default position is to argue that QE causes asset prices to rise.  All that “money printing” has to “go somewhere” right?   Maybe not….Now, I don’t think that’s entirely irrational as markets are driven largely by psychology, but there are times when this myth seems to take on a life of its own.  Maybe Europe proves that we need to temper our taper expectations and stop expecting so much from the Fed’s policies?    And maybe it proves that the Bernanke Put is not as important as some people seem to think?

Comments are closed.