<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RAIL TRAFFIC DOWN 17.9% YEAR OVER YEAR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/rail-traffic-down-179-year-over-year/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/rail-traffic-down-179-year-over-year</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:38:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregg</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/rail-traffic-down-179-year-over-year/comment-page-1#comment-3836</link>
		<dc:creator>gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6959#comment-3836</guid>
		<description>On the same theme, did you see YRC (symbol YRCW) results:

&quot;Reports Q2 (Jun) loss of $3.53 per share, $1.82 worse than the First Call consensus of ($1.71); revenues fell 44.6% year/year to $1.33 bln vs the $1.59 bln consensus.&quot;

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/YRC-Worldwide-posts-huge-2Q-apf-2258278872.html?x=0&amp;.v=13</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the same theme, did you see YRC (symbol YRCW) results:</p>
<p>&#8220;Reports Q2 (Jun) loss of $3.53 per share, $1.82 worse than the First Call consensus of ($1.71); revenues fell 44.6% year/year to $1.33 bln vs the $1.59 bln consensus.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/YRC-Worldwide-posts-huge-2Q-apf-2258278872.html?x=0&#038;.v=13" rel="nofollow">http://finance.yahoo.com/news/YRC-Worldwide-posts-huge-2Q-apf-2258278872.html?x=0&#038;.v=13</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/rail-traffic-down-179-year-over-year/comment-page-1#comment-3831</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6959#comment-3831</guid>
		<description>Not to mention the ATA reported record setting declines in air cargo traffic.  The transports have always led us out of recessions.  I don&#039;t see why it will be different this time....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention the ATA reported record setting declines in air cargo traffic.  The transports have always led us out of recessions.  I don&#8217;t see why it will be different this time&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/rail-traffic-down-179-year-over-year/comment-page-1#comment-3829</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6959#comment-3829</guid>
		<description>Carloads do not clearly represent the economy in my opinion.  They are too skewed by the commodities.  Intermodal is a better gauge of consumers and the real economy.  

The weekly numbers are all over the place.  If -18% compared to last year looks like improvement to you then I guess we&#039;ll just have to agree to disagree. -18% this long into a recession is a staggering number.  Any bits of hope are meager at best in the rail data and it&#039;s important that comps are becoming much easier as we move into the latter portion of the year.  

The trucking data also rhymes with my rail data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carloads do not clearly represent the economy in my opinion.  They are too skewed by the commodities.  Intermodal is a better gauge of consumers and the real economy.  </p>
<p>The weekly numbers are all over the place.  If -18% compared to last year looks like improvement to you then I guess we&#8217;ll just have to agree to disagree. -18% this long into a recession is a staggering number.  Any bits of hope are meager at best in the rail data and it&#8217;s important that comps are becoming much easier as we move into the latter portion of the year.  </p>
<p>The trucking data also rhymes with my rail data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Ouellet</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/rail-traffic-down-179-year-over-year/comment-page-1#comment-3828</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Ouellet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6959#comment-3828</guid>
		<description>I look at the weekly trends and things are indeed looking up. Total weekly carloads and the 4-week moving average rose to their highest levels since March and, significantly, weekly intermodal traffic reached its highest level since January. See my chart at http://www.news-to-use.com/2009/07/us-rail-carloads-up-strongly-last-week.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look at the weekly trends and things are indeed looking up. Total weekly carloads and the 4-week moving average rose to their highest levels since March and, significantly, weekly intermodal traffic reached its highest level since January. See my chart at <a href="http://www.news-to-use.com/2009/07/us-rail-carloads-up-strongly-last-week.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.news-to-use.com/2009/07/us-rail-carloads-up-strongly-last-week.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPC</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/rail-traffic-down-179-year-over-year/comment-page-1#comment-3824</link>
		<dc:creator>TPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6959#comment-3824</guid>
		<description>I prefer to use intermodal because it translates to the consumer better.  The recent stockpiling in China has skewed all the commodity data.  Thanks for the compliments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer to use intermodal because it translates to the consumer better.  The recent stockpiling in China has skewed all the commodity data.  Thanks for the compliments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dorky</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/rail-traffic-down-179-year-over-year/comment-page-1#comment-3822</link>
		<dc:creator>dorky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=6959#comment-3822</guid>
		<description>Love your blog. Read it all the time.

It looks to me like the trend in carloadings is better than it looks. Coal is a big part, but the lack of cooling days this summer is not letting that improve too much. OTOH, if you take out coal, there is a clear upward trend. Hope it continues!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your blog. Read it all the time.</p>
<p>It looks to me like the trend in carloadings is better than it looks. Coal is a big part, but the lack of cooling days this summer is not letting that improve too much. OTOH, if you take out coal, there is a clear upward trend. Hope it continues!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

