Good thoughts here from theoretical physicist Mark Buchanan. In a Bloomberg piece he warns us to beware of economists peddling elegant models:
“If economists jettisoned elegance and got to work developing more realistic models, we might gain a better understanding of how crises happen, and learn how to anticipate similarly unstable episodes in the future. The theories won’t be pretty, and probably won’t show off any clever mathematics. But we ought to prefer ugly realism to beautiful fantasy.”
Realism, realistic models and a better understanding of our problems using a purely descriptive version of the money system? Sounds like Buchanan is referring to Monetary Realism. Even better, none of its founders are economists. :-)
Read the full thing here.
Read Some Related Posts
All-Time Highs in the Stock Market are Perfectly Normal
“If you think the market’s “too high” wait ’til you see it 20 years from now.” – Nick Murray ...read more
AI, Robotics, and the Future of Jobs
This is a good piece sent courtesy of John Mauldin. It goes well with this video which is a pretty scary perspective of what the robots could do ...read more
Citi: Beware Rising HY Spreads
Worried about a potential recession and another big market decline? Analysts at Citi say a good way to track this risk is to look at the HY bond spreads. Specifically, ...read more
What Backs the Value of Money?
I was reading this very good piece by Matthew Klein at FT Alphaville when I came across this line: "The only kinds of money that reliably hold their value are the ...read more