Home » Most Recent Stories

ROBERT SHILLER DEBUNKS THE STOCK MARKET “WEALTH EFFECT”

8 November 2010 by Cullen Roche 5 Comments

The evidence continues to mount against QE.  Mr. Bernanke didn’t see this crisis coming, he responded too late and now he continues to respond with the wrong medicine.  Nonetheless, markets trust his every last move. This debunking comes from noted economist Robert Shiller who says the “wealth effect” from the equity market is “weak” and “not supported in our results”:

“We have examined the wealth effect with a cross-sectional time-series data sets that are more comprehensive than any applied to the wealth effect before and with a number of different econometric specifications.  The statistical results are variable depending on econometric specification, and so any conclusion must be tentative.  Nevertheless, the evidence of a stock market wealth effect is weak; the common presumption that there is strong evidence for the wealth effect is not supported in our results. However, we do find strong evidence that variations in housing market wealth have important effects upon consumption.  This evidence arises consistently using panels of U.S. states and individual countries and is robust to differences in model specification. The housing market appears to be more important than the stock market in influencing consumption in developed countries.”


Source: Plan B economics (thanks to reader Oroboros)

Cullen Roche

Cullen Roche

Bio - Coming Soon.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
TwitterYouTube

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
  • Old Timer

    Most excellent and rigorous analysis analysis. Thank you!

    Data used goes through the end of 1999 I believe.

    This analysis therefore ends at approximately the transition from the period of Speculative Finance to Ponzi Finance in the US.

    I would think the data from the past decade would further reinforce the author’s conclusions.

  • SS

    So the market has rallied 20% on nothing? There is no inflation from this, no wealth effect, no jobs, etc. Is the Fed just talking up the market? What is all the fuss about? Or is this just a crazy huge irrational market?

    • LVG

      That’s the key here. What is the real impact of the interest rate change? We’ve had falling interest rates for two years now and the economy still stinks.

  • SS

    It wouldn’t just reinforce it. It would probably obliterate this insane notion that paper gains = real wealth.

  • Blobby

    Cheap money hunting yield = increased asset prices

    When to sell… !?