SAUT: THE SELL-OFF WILL BE A BUYING OPPORTUNITY
Jeff Saut’s most recent strategy note reflects our opinion that the latest wave of selling is no reason to panic and run for your bunker. After turning cautious early in the year Saut now says the market is likely half way through a 17-25 day “selling stampede” before it resumes its uptrend. Based on strengthening credit markets and overall improving fundamentals Saut still thinks the Lehman vacuum is likely to be filled before the rally is over:
“we believe the decline that began on January 20th is merely the normal correction everybody has been looking for since July. Buttressing that view is the fact the advance/decline line is firm (read: the breadth is still good), the number of new annual lows on the NYSE is not expanding, the yield curve remains steep, none of our proprietary intermediate indicators have rendered a “sell signal,” and the list goes on. All of this suggests the cyclical bull-market is still intact and stock prices should find support at, or above, the 200-day moving average (DMA), which is currently at approximately 1013 basis the S&P 500 (SPX/1073.87).”
Using the 2003/2004 rally as a playbook Saut says we are in the middle of a near-term correction before the rally continues. He says the market should find its footing near a 10% total decline from the peak:
“Recall, the SPX bottomed in March 2003 and rallied. The first leg of that rally peaked in late-May/early-June. From there, stocks flopped/chopped around, but never really gave back much ground. Then stage 2 of the rally began, which carried stocks higher into January 2004. The first leg of that 2003/2004 rally was driven by liquidity, while the second leg was spurred by improving earnings and fundamentals. If that sounds familiar, it should, because that is pretty much the sequence we have seen since the March 2009 “lows.” If that pattern continues to play, it calls for roughly a 10% correction and then a resumption of the rally.”
But his bullish longer-term thesis doesn’t mean he is jumping back into stocks now. Saut is waiting for the selling stampede to play itself out and would only become more worried if we break the December low:
“The call for this week: Potentially, today is session 9 of a selling-stampede, which has often been chronicled in these reports. Recall that such stampedes tend to last 17 to 25 sessions, with only one- to three-session counter-trend rallies, before they exhaust themselves on the downside. The January “stock sprawl” has left all of the averages we follow down year-to-date, as well as below their respective December “lows,” thus evoking Lucien Hooper’s warning, “If the December low is violated any time in the first quarter of the new year, watch out!” Accordingly, we remain cautious.”
Read Saut’s full piece here.
Source: RJ
i think this guy changes opinion as often as the direction of the wind…
TPC Reply:
February 1st, 2010 at 9:19 PM
You have to parse some of his double talk, but I’ve been following Saut for a long time and he is very good.
“The first leg of that 2003/2004 rally was driven by liquidity, while the second leg was spurred by improving earnings and fundamentals. If that sounds familiar, it should, because that is pretty much the sequence we have seen since the March 2009 “lows.” If that pattern continues to play, it calls for roughly a 10% correction and then a resumption of the rally.”
Actually, the second leg of 2004 was also driven by liquidity … coming from China … and this produced the earnings. I don’t see consumer credit expanding in the US … maybe the Fortune 100 internationals will make some meager $$’s from credit expanding in China, Oz etc., but I doubt it (at least not for the 2004 analogy).
Would this be the same Jeff Saut who in late 2007 thought a recession was an unlikely event?
If the choice is listening to him or flipping a coin, I’ll take the coin.
Technicals are all well and good but what about liquidity going away in March (MBS purchases)? In the end it is all about money flow.
chris Reply:
February 2nd, 2010 at 7:00 AM
grannis has a recent post regarding the increase in velocity of money: http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/2010/01/money-velocity-macro-driver-of-gdp.html demand for credit may meet the near future increase in supply of money…or the fed can just change its mind.
as GS would say, just another mort turned bull market genius..
Just out of curiousity what was the December low on the S&P? thanks
TPC Reply:
February 1st, 2010 at 9:19 PM
Not sure exactly, but it was already violated….
Uformula Reply:
February 2nd, 2010 at 8:26 AM
Yeah it has,,, along with the December low in the Dow and Nasdaq.
MARKET QUOTES
MARKET NEWS
THIS WEEKS MOST POPULAR STORIES
© 2009 pragcap.com · Login.
Home · Advertise · Contact us · Disclaimer ·