CORPORATE AMERICA REMAINS STRONG
If there has been one undeniably bullish trend in the last 18 months it has been the strong earnings picture. I have given the sell side analysts a fairly hard time over the course of the last year, but the strength in earnings has shocked me and my estimates tend to be quite a bit tougher than the consensus. I expected the slowdown in mid-year growth to hit the top line harder than it has, but the international diversity of U.S. firms has helped maintain healthy revenue growth at a time when companies have been incredibly vigilant about cost cuts. U.S. companies have masterfully weaved through this recession in an effort to protect their profits and the results have been impressive. With 90% of the S&P reporting in the Q3 earnings season the numbers are very strong:
- 72% of companies have topped EPS estimates.
- 60% have topped revenue estimates
- Just 19% missed EPS estimates.
- Sales are up 9.8% year over year.
- EPS growth is 32% year over yar
Of course, the cost cuts have come at a cost as millions of Americans remain out of work. Thus far domestic revenues have not sustained a level that has resulted in a substantial pick-up in hiring. But corporations have made up for the less than stellar top line growth by boosting margins. Margins are currently approaching their 2007 peaks, but likely have some room for expansion. It will be interesting to see how QE2 and the impact of rising input costs influences this picture. At first blush, the impact does not appear to be widespread, however, we’ll have a better understanding of the Q4 earnings picture in the coming months when pre-announcements begin. For now, the margin story is intact. At risk, of course, is the labor force in the case that margins begin to turn. For now it looks like the combination of strong international sales and weak domestic sales will be enough to help labor markets slowly continue to heal. In a fluid and low visibility environment, however, this could change given the numerous exogenous risks.
(Figure 1)
The revenue story has been better than expected, however, is far from v-shaped. Revenues per share remain well off their all-time highs despite a strong rebound in bottom line growth. Quarter over quarter revenues per share are growing at 2.6% while the year over year figure sits s 7%. The strength in revenues has been largely due to international strength:
“S&P500 companies that generate more than half of revenue from overseas operations are expected to see higher 2010 revenue growth (10 percent in aggregate), compared to slower growth (6 percent in aggregate) for companies that derived more than half of revenue from domestic operations, a Thomson Reuters Datastream analysis reveals.”
The biggest threat to top line growth going ahead is a sl0w-down in Asia. For now, that does not appear to be in the cards.
(Figure 2)
My expectation ratio is telling a similar story. The index has trended very strongly since the market bottomed early in 2009 and aside from a brief dip in mid April the index has remained strong. Thus far it continues to tell a story of strong corporate earnings going forward. All in all it’s a story of impressive growth, with the “better than expected” trend intact, but with risks remaining as domestic revenues have failed to sustain US corporate growth.
(Figure 3)









Sure everything looks great when a nation overspends roughly 10% of its GDP two years in a row.
I know, I know, the US technically can never go bankrupt. But you know what? Imagine if every country in the world tried the “free lunch” monetary policy the US is implementing. Oh wait, they are. And those that aren’t are extremely upset.
It won’t end well.
The domestic demand story appears to be improving slightly. It will be interesting to see if the momentum continues or if the housing double dip derails the US consumer and make us entirely dependent on China. Also curious to see if we get many earnings warnings next Q due to margin compression courtesy of one Ben Bernanke….
Except China is entirely dependent on the US consumer!
Writing from overseas,
I think it is usefull to show the S&P chart as well. I know that surprises are seen on the upside, people are underinvested etc. That is what will be communicated until we go down. But at these levels we are pricing in a future without a single problem.
As everyone knows we are trading stocks on “Head line information only”. At lot of low balling the estimates, coming in way better, and so on…..it must be depressing analysing companies and being killed every earnings season. But as long as you have a buy recommendation it is not a problem. Actually, it is seen as something positive.
It is now generally tought that the economy is improving. In my view that is the result of a stock market going north. Looking at the real figures they are not that good, not improving, even if they are communicated as coming in way better.
Company earnings are improving, not on sales and top line but on the bottom line the are really improving. That is the result of when government use taxpayer money to bid up the demand side of the economy.
There is a constant need to explain what is going on. The stock market giong up, markets are never wrong = the economy must be improving.
Decoupling 2.0
What % of the data do the banks represent? I’m curious since their bottom lines are really just a marking up of assets and decline of reserves. I would like to see the difference in sales growth and EBIT margins for an S&P index without financial companies vs an S&P with financials.
CORPORATE AMERICA? should be renamed “Global Giants in America”. With almost all manufacturing bases overseas, and 50% or more revenue from overseas, I can hardly call them CORPORATE AMERICA.
TPC, for the most part, I’ve been following your blog, but have missed a few days. Does this posting mean you are no longer net short on equities? Sorry if I’ve missed an earlier reversal.
No, my opinion of the market in the near-term has not changed. I view earnings as more of a medium-term trend and a lot can change in the next 2-3 months before the next reporting season….
OK, thanks. As a side note, I listen to most bulls, bears, blogs, network news, and so on. I’ve chosen your blog as the most comprehensive and complete for “practical” analysis. I need training wheels when it comes to making investment decisions, and reading your blog makes me FEEL smarter. It must be painful for you at times, but the way you bring the industry jargon down to a level that most can understand is appreciated.
Gotta agree. I never post on this site, but it’s namely because the arguments made by TPC are cogent and well informed. Don’t want to butt-kiss too much, but sometimes positive reinforcement is appreciated. Keep up the great work TPC.
What does this mean” “But corporations have made up for the less than stellar top line growth by boosting margins.”
The “less than stellar top line growth” means companies’ sales aren’t increasing as much as they would like. The “boosting margins” part means that since sales aren’t growing very much, companies are cutting costs to preserve their profit margins (i.e. layoffs, leaving job openings vacant, increasing worker efficiency, whatever can be done to cut costs) and show a profit.
TPC,
How do you see the overall deflation picture play out? QE2 is Bernanke showing us that he cannot inflate through the banks anymore and has now resorted to less conventional means. If QE2 fails and I dont know why it would succeed then the deleveraging of 50+ trillion in outstanding debt should continue. Housing will continue to slump and consumers will find themselves once again with no disrectionary spending what so ever. Throw in higher food/energy prices and it’s not a pretty picture. Would this not bring us back to 2008 and a resumption of the contraction that we so desperately need?
Very intresting. I am in importing(furniture to be exact out of Asia) We are just starting and I mean just this month to get price increases, they are rolling in quite large, one today 9%! and prices out of Asia are only valid for 6 months now.
The company states materials price pressure,$, but wage increases are the largest component, they are saying 30% increases in wages.
I can tell you the last time this happened at these extreams 2008
When multinational corporations finally get their US demand models in line with reality then maybe they will begin to hit their ‘top line growth’ guidance.
Even though earnings of Q3 were better than expected, approx. 50% of the earning reports were worse than in Q2. The pace of earning growth is losing steam. Additionally, companies are facing higher material costs due to QE2 and austerity which might set margins and revenues under pressure going forward. The bulls have got the upper hand right now but the bears ain`t dead.
An article compares Bernanke’s simultaneous QE and IOR (interest on reserves) to a bus flooring the accelerator and the brake at the same time.
http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2010/11/11/why_the_feds_qeii_will_not_work__98753.html
The question I have for TPC is why is Bernanke still paying interest on reserves if he really wants banks to lend – or is something else going on?
IOR puts a floor under the FF rate. I kind of view it like an alternative to the FF rate. The FED can now raise the IOR rate whenever they want to tighten monetary policy. It allows them to maintain a high level of reserves in the banking system while also not losing control of the FF rate. If they didn’t do this the banks would bid the overnight rate down to 0%.