Home » Most Recent Stories

S&P: BANK CRISIS TO LAST UNTIL 2013

15 May 2009 by Cullen Roche 0 Comments

Recent consumer borrowing and spending data has me convinced that the road to recovery is going to be a long one.  The duration of the banking crisis, however, is still up in the air.  The extreme improvement in credit indicators leads me to believe that the worst of the banking crisis is likely over.  The extent of the sector’s recovery is still very much in doubt though.  A recent report out of S&P says the banks could remain under substantial pressure until 2013 or 2014.  Reuters reports:

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A day after saying big U.S. banks probably needed to raise only one-fourth the capital demanded by the government, Standard & Poor’s said the nation’s banking crisis has “merely entered a new phase” and might not end before 2013.

The credit rating agency said the industry is being propped up by hundreds of billions of dollars of government support, especially for lenders considered too important to the financial system to fail.

Unfortunately for the banks, much of their future performance is dependent on the aforementioned weak consumer.  It takes two to borrow and in this case the consumer just isn’t that eager to pile back into debt.  The banks may have entered a less risky phase of the crisis (as the banks in Japan did after about 18 months), but recovery was still in the offing.  According to S&P’s Tanya Azarchs:

“Banks are far from a recovery, and the banking crisis has merely entered a new phase.   Although our analytical time horizon for losses extends only through 2010 … there’s nothing to say that this banking crisis can’t go on for another three or four years.”

S&P  says there are a number of factors still hindering the banks:

  • Industry risk is generally creeping higher rather than stabilizing;
  • Losses during this downturn will likely be greater than the industry thought when it began;
  • Franchise stability and market confidence are increasingly critical components of credit;
  • There’s a greater focus on capital adequacy;
  • Government support is now explicit in our ratings for highly systemically important U.S. banks;
  • Hybrid securities appear to be riskier than we thought;
  • The industry structure is changing;
  • Volatility appears to be here to stay;
  • The originate-to-distribute model is being rethought; and
  • Regulation is generally increasing.

As I’ve been saying for months, this isn’t so much a banking crisis as it is a consumer crisis.  The banks are dependent on the consumer to increase their borrowing and pad those bank balance sheets with their ever reliable debt payments.  Unfortunately, the likelihood of that occurring does not appear very high at this juncture.

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.