<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TECHNICAL ANALYSIS: A LOSER&#8217;S GAME?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/technical-analysis-a-losers-game/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/technical-analysis-a-losers-game</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:27:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/technical-analysis-a-losers-game/comment-page-1#comment-7360</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=11121#comment-7360</guid>
		<description>Reddweb, absolutely tech analysis doesn&#039;t care if unemployment is low or high.  It goes with a trend and volume, and in some cases is superior.  But eventually fundamental analysis does take over TA.  The question is just when...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reddweb, absolutely tech analysis doesn&#8217;t care if unemployment is low or high.  It goes with a trend and volume, and in some cases is superior.  But eventually fundamental analysis does take over TA.  The question is just when&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reddweb</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/technical-analysis-a-losers-game/comment-page-1#comment-7356</link>
		<dc:creator>reddweb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=11121#comment-7356</guid>
		<description>i dont know. I recently realized that the fundamental analysis is crap. How else can you explain the 60% rally in last few months. I wouldn&#039;t have missed the rally if not for all the blogs, gurus, fundamental analysis. I would have caught atleast 50% of the entire rally if I followed tech.analysis. Higher Low ---&gt; then enter with tight stop. Its not a sure bet, but five tries with tight stop and hitting a trend with one of those tries and sticking with the trend would have helped me ride almost entire rally. I know its hind-sight, but i think it is possible with tech.analysis, though it needs strong stomach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont know. I recently realized that the fundamental analysis is crap. How else can you explain the 60% rally in last few months. I wouldn&#8217;t have missed the rally if not for all the blogs, gurus, fundamental analysis. I would have caught atleast 50% of the entire rally if I followed tech.analysis. Higher Low &#8212;&gt; then enter with tight stop. Its not a sure bet, but five tries with tight stop and hitting a trend with one of those tries and sticking with the trend would have helped me ride almost entire rally. I know its hind-sight, but i think it is possible with tech.analysis, though it needs strong stomach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/technical-analysis-a-losers-game/comment-page-1#comment-7354</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=11121#comment-7354</guid>
		<description>Technical analysis is good to help time entry and exit points...but if you are JUST using TA then you are doomed.  I believe if you are using just fundamental analysis you are going to be going through some pain as well, but it isn&#039;t bad as just using TA...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technical analysis is good to help time entry and exit points&#8230;but if you are JUST using TA then you are doomed.  I believe if you are using just fundamental analysis you are going to be going through some pain as well, but it isn&#8217;t bad as just using TA&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

