Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

THE BANK PROFIT MIRAGE REDUX

By Annaly Capital Management:

On December 1, 2009, we posted a piece here looking at the 3rd quarter FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile, which contained one of our favorite charts.  The FDIC released the 4th quarter report on the banking sector today, so we update the chart and present it below.  It shows the relationship between noncurrent loans and leases and the level of loan loss reserves available to protect bank capital from losses.  The coverage ratio is simply the loss reserve as a percentage of noncurrent loans and leases.

Click Here to Enlarge Chart

Let’s keep this short and sweet.  The coverage ratio fell to 58.1% from 60.1% in the previous quarter and 75.3% a year ago.  The quarterly provision for loan losses, which is added to the reserve pictured above, is an expense that comes out of earnings.  Even as the FDIC says in its own press release that “asset quality indicators worsened in the fourth quarter” and that net charge-offs (NCOs) increased by roughly $2 billion in the quarter, the provision for loan losses fell by $1.7 billion from the previous quarter.  The provision collectively made by the banks in the 4th quarter is the lowest since the 3rd quarter of 2008.  At this point we will call attention to the top two headlines on the FDIC press release:

  • Industry Reports Fourth Quarter Net Income of $914 Million
  • Loss Provisions Remain High but Register First Year-Over-Year Decline in More Than Three Years

We present a few bullet points in response:

  • If the coverage ratio had simply held steady at 60.1% (a number we believe is ridiculously low to begin with), banks would have increased the quarterly provision by $7.6 billion, easily erasing the $914 million in “profits” for the insured banks. How regulators can continue to allow the banks to show positive earnings through underprovisioning is a mystery. When we consider that the average coverage ratio since the early 1990s is well north of double the current ratio, it’s hard to consider the banking system to be well-protected against potential losses. The only rational reason to reduce provisions today is if bankers believe that they are already adequately reserved and that losses will be subsiding. The FDIC doesn’t even believe that. Sheila Bair told Bloomberg News today that “The pace [of bank failures] is going to pick up this year and is going to exceed where we were last year.”
  • It is incongruous to celebrate the first year-over-year decline in provisions in the same press release in which it is stated that “this is the 12th consecutive quarter than NCOs have posted a year-over-year increase.”

Comments are closed.