THE CLOCK IS TICKING ON THE NEXT EUROZONE CRISIS

By Lance Roberts, CEO, StreetTalk Live

The battle lines have been drawn as the next evolution of the crisis in the Eurozone will likely be determined in the next 12-18 months as austerity runs up against the socialist agenda. The problems are real and the solutions are evident. In order for the Eurozone to survive the shift from a fragmented confederacy of states to a constitutional union with a primary central bank with the ability to issue its own currency is crucial. However, without unification under a binding agreement the future of the Eurozone is bleak and the next crisis will sweep the globe.

The problem today is “too many chiefs and no Indians”. The political dam has broken in Europe as German Chancellor Angela Merkel no longer has enough allies within the group of the EU prime ministers to impose her agenda. Merkel’s methodical plans are disintegrating on every front which means that sooner, rather than later, a confrontation is going to occur. The question will be whether Germany will bend to more a more socialist agenda, give up austerity measures and return to unbridled deficit spending or will a lasting compromise be reached. I currently believe that both outcomes are unlikely and it will resolve into a grudge match on a grand scale.

Unlike the U.S. which is a monetary union of 50 states with governments operating under a single constitution, central bank and government, the Eurozone is a cluster of states each with an independent government which were happy to work together as long as there were benefits. However, now that the system is broken no one wants to be responsible for fixing it and instead have resorted to idle threats and finger pointing. Without some cohesive authority to impose resolutions and solutions the end is inevitable. It is like asking a group of school children who stole the eraser. While there are many accusations and finger pointing – no one is willing to take the blame. Not even the child with chalk dust all over his hands.

The shortsightedness of the citizens, both in Europe and the U.S., is troubling. The recent elections prove that most Europeans continue to want other people to continue paying for their socialism and unwarranted lifestyles. The problem with that, which is already evident, is that at some point “other people” will no longer be willing to give you money. It is at that point that the crisis emerges. However, Europe, very much like the U.S., is not ready for real reform. The anti-austerity and fiscal profligacy have won out in the recent elections in France and Greece and are a death knell to resolve the issues that face the Eurozone. Welfare-state dependents around the globe will not yield their benefits until the markets force reform upon them. This will not be the first time either as history is replete with governments that ran the limits of spending and debt. Over the past 800 years no country has ever done what is necessary to fend off a financial crisis before it occurs and this time will likely be no different. This is why it is very likely that a new, more virulent European debt crisis will soon appear.

While the mainstream media and analysts continue to press for more liquidity in both the domestic and international economies – they dare not address the issues of this potential for a new debt crisis, who will fund continued socialism or how that will affect European bonds which are producing large losses for Euro banks, the ECB and other central banks. The stunning victory of the French Socialists and wipeout of mainstream parties in Greece show that the voters are unwilling to sacrifice for their future’s sake. Conservative rebel Panos Kammenos, who stormed out of nowhere, has put himself in a strong position and says that the bailout is destroying Greece’s sovereignty, condemning it to become a powerless province in a “federalist” Europe that he describes as a “Fourth Reich” dominated by Germany.

Greece’s New Democracy leader Samaras has asserted that they will accept responsibility to form a new government under two conditions which are that Greece stays in the EU and a renegotiation of the bailout package. The problem is that Germany has no interest in renegotiating the bailout package and ruled out reworking the fiscal pact this past Monday despite calls to do so by the French president-elect Francois Hollande. Angela Merkel is staunchly opposed to further “deficit spending” to feed economic expansion and believes in “growth through structural reforms” such as reducing the cost of job creation which has been successful in Germany over the last decade.

The problem is the austerity and economic growths are diametrically opposed to each other. It is like trying to lose weight by eating. It can be done but both must be balanced accordingly along with a supplement program of exercise. The same balance of diet and supplement has to be applied in the Eurozone and in the U.S. Austerity measures are required to reduce the debt burdens which act as a cancer on economic growth. However, implementing austerity through spending cuts negatively affects economic growth putting more pressure on the masses. Therefore, the cuts in spending have to be balanced against growth measures and supplemented with deficit spending, when necessary, to support the growth measures. However, and this is key, the deficit spending must be used only in manners that create a positive return on investment such as building of infrastructure. In this manner the deficit spending does not create a further liability but rather an investment that repays itself over time.

We have warned that the agents and beneficiaries of socialism will not go quietly into the night. So it is no surprise, except to the obstinate, that newly elected socialists in Greece and France have vowed to keep their pre-election promises and increase socialism. The reality is that the dark side of socialism (confiscatory taxes, redistribution of wealth, more debt, more government intrusion and central planning) trumps the expedient benefits of deficit spending when sovereign debt and banks are at the abyss.

For Germany it is a moment of truth. Berlin has put off hard choices since the crisis began. It has refused Eurobonds or budget transfers, stepping back from the Rubicon of fiscal union. Angela Merkel has insisted on austerity and reforms alone, imposing the full burden of adjustment on the weaker states. Merkel has brushed aside arguments the EMU’s crisis is in essence a North-South imbalance in trade and capital flows that cannot be corrected in this fashion within a currency union.

The seeds have been sown and yet everyone is currently assuming that a crisis will not blossom or if it does that authorities will quickly rush in to squelch it with a liquidity fire hose. The problem with short term fixes is the long term economic ramifications as continued increases in debt service reduce economic prosperity. It is imperative that in very short order that the individual states that make up the European Union actually come together as an Union. Working together and balancing the austerity with growth reforms with supplements of productive deficit spending the EU can survive. However, continuing down the current path will lead to the next financial crisis that will likely be worse than the last.

Lance Roberts

Lance Roberts

Lance Roberts is the CEO of Streettalk Advisors. The mission of Streettalk Advisors is simple - lead our clients to financial success by actively managing their assets while limiting risk to capture returns. Through the utilization of economic and technical analysis, historical research, and risk controls, we build portfolios which will create long-term investment results.

More Posts - Website

13 Comments

  1. KG21 says:

    Its funny how you are condemning socialism which is practically non-existent,while the only countries that actually have a form of socialism (Norway and Scandinavian countries in general) have nowhere near similar problems with the eurozone periphery.

    • Ed says:

      Greece, France, Spain and Italy don’t have socialist policies? How about healthcare as one example. How about retirement for civil service workers and their 80% pensions. There is nothing free in life. Someone always has to pay. The problem in these countries is that its tyranny of the majority. The majority with the assistance of politicans seeking votes, use government coercion to take from the productive to pay for these benefits. The EU is going to collapse and the sooner the better. If the Greeks, the French, the Spainards etc want a socialist system, then fine, you pay for it yourself. Why should the Germans be forced to carry them. It would be better for Germany to pull out of the EU already. Short term pain will suck but its better than putting up with the EU bureaucrats.

  2. SC says:

    I find your analysis of options a bit simplistic.Politics and this is certainly politics does not usually find an outcome the way you ,or I might if we are faced with some idiot in the pub. Our options are usually walk away ,or thump them. Politics will do neither,it will fudge it’s way forward with each side giving some ground to allow each side to stay at the table which afterall feeds them all.
    At a push I see no exits and a gradual acceptance that austerity reform will continue,but the timelines will be extended to allow a more gradual approach.Such an approach will be rationalised not to be breaking the fiscal pact thus satisfying Germany on the grounds that the pact does allow for manouvering room etc etc waffle waffle. That is politics in action and I’d say that is what awaits us and as a possility it s more likely that the media garbage which looks for dramatic outcomes which can sell news.

  3. Old Dog says:

    Yes – difficult choices will be forced on all – in Europe, the US and elsewhere.

    In the past – such times of economic stress inevitably led to wars.

    Hopefully that is no longer an acceptable alternative.

  4. perpetual neophyte perpetual neophyte says:

    I met with a strategist yesterday who made a great observation. He asked, “Who has the most to lose in a breakup of the EMU?” My first thought was Germany.

    His response, “The ECB and all the EU bureaucrats.”

    If one should not fight the Fed, should one also not fight the ECB and the EU bureaucrats?

    • rhp says:

      “If one should not fight the Fed, should one also not fight the ECB and the EU bureaucrats?”

      It depends if you think their strength will remain greater than that of the angry masses of greeks, spaniards, french, dutch, portuguese, irish….etc etc… Don’t forget, Ireland has a referendum coming up the end of this month and i don’t think THEY are any too happy either………

      • Andrew P says:

        The problem with the EU is they lack the primary mechanism of consolidating power throughout history – military force. They control money, issue lots or regulations, and do some other things, but the only unified military command in the EU is NATO. The EU cannot become a consolidated federal entity without unified military command. I just can’t see the voters of the EU States willingly giving up their own military power at the ballot box. Ain’t gonna happen. Unless the EU Bureaucrats find a way to usurp this power, they will not be able to bring about the political unification that the Eurozone needs to survive.

  5. VII VII says:

    If I’m an investor I’m uncomfortable with what I’m see in Europe. Regarding the peoples unwillingness to go along one more step.

    I fully expect to receive my “Guy Falkes Mask” in the mail prior to London 2012.

  6. “it will resolve into a grudge match on a grand scale”

    The Germans are absolutely committed to the grand EU project. They benefit from it and will do whatever it takes to keep the project in place. More integration is almost certainly coming, as opposed to less.

    The vote in Greece is a protest vote against the mainstream political parties- not a protest vote against the EU. The Greek people overwhelmingly support membership of the Euro and EU. They remember the chaos under the Greek Drachma. If a second election becomes a quasi-referendum on EU membership then they will vote accordingly for the mainstream parties.

    Socialist parties are also now making ground in Germany. Merkel will give ground and we will see more easing from the ECB and the media will have to find something else to get into a flap about – what about the US debt ceiling?

    • JCR says:

      Agree completely, at least with your “Germans are absolutely committed to the grand EU project”. The value of the Euro is suppressed by German participation. A stand alone German Mark would make their exports much less competitive…..

    • Nils Nils says:

      Most Germans don’t like the Euro, but politically that’s not a thing you get to vote on. Which Socialist parties are you talking about?

  7. Andrew P says:

    I don’t see any way for true unification of Europe to come about through democratic, constitutional mechanisms. They need a Dictator. They need a Caesar. I’ve seen some talk of creating a new President of Europe by combining the positions of President of the Commission and the Council into one EU Executive President. There is also no easier way to put unemployed people to work than to draft them into an army. What if they create their new President, and he gets the ECB to fund an EU wide draft of unemployed youth? That would be the perfect tool for a new Caesar to consolidate power.

  8. Huckleberry says:

    Democracy in action is messy. Full of uncertainty. This is why the wealthy try to undercut it at every opportunity. Always have, always will.

    Are we to make the world safe for democracy, or for finance capital? Despite much propaganda, most people understand these are not the same thing.

    But you’re saying you want to see more power, over more people, placed in the hands of people who see the world exactly as you do. Smells totalitarian.

    The great mass of people who don’t make money shuffling digital paper to no useful purpose do not, for the moment, want this.

    The collapse of an ideology presents a pathetic spectacle. But when it is not accompanied by a loss of actual power, it is terrifying.

Contact Us:

Name:

Email:

Verification Image

Enter number from above: