Following QE2 I wrote a controversial piece that argued the Fed was not monetizing the debt. The purpose of the article was to show how the Fed was not increasing the net financial assets via QE or enabling the government’s fiscal policies. My argument was rather simple:
1) QE involves swapping reserves for bonds which results in no change in the private sector’s net financial assets. It merely changes the COMPOSITION of assets.
2) Monetizing the debt implies that there is not enough demand for government bonds and that the Fed needs to backstop the market for government bonds. This can’t be true though because the Primary Dealers are required to bid at auctions and would only reject this mandated duty in case of a hyperinflation where it became unaffordable for them to serve as the government’s funding agent. (This doesn’t mean inflation couldn’t result in currency and bond rejection!).
So I was extremely pleased to see Bernanke say the following this morning:
“By buying securities, are you “monetizing the debt”–printing money for the government to use–and will that inevitably lead to higher inflation? No, that’s not what is happening, and that will not happen. Monetizing the debt means using money creation as a permanent source of financing for government spending. In contrast, we are acquiring Treasury securities on the open market and only on a temporary basis, with the goal of supporting the economic recovery through lower interest rates. At the appropriate time, the Federal Reserve will gradually sell these securities or let them mature, as needed, to return its balance sheet to a more normal size. Moreover, the way the Fed finances its securities purchases is by creating reserves in the banking system. Increased bank reserves held at the Fed don’t necessarily translate into more money or cash in circulation, and, indeed, broad measures of the supply of money have not grown especially quickly, on balance, over the past few years.” (emphasis added)
Dr. Bernanke’s always understood this. The general public has gotten this colossally wrong though….For more on QE please see the understanding QE section on the site.
Read Some Related Articles on Pragmatic Capitalism -
Lessons From the Newest Electronic Money - Bitcoin
One of the more interesting developments of the electronic age of money has been the rise of Bitcoin, a decentralized digital currency. If you're not familiar with it or ...read more
Some Thoughts on the Future of Home Prices
I was reading this report from Zillow on the future of home prices and it got me thinking about some of the macro trends in real estate. I've turned much ...read more
QE & Stock Prices - A Review of Recent Data
One of the primary goals of Quantitative Easing is the portfolio rebalancing effect and subsequent wealth effect that supposedly occurs as the Fed reduces outstanding private sector bond holdings and ...read more
Robert Shiller: Don't Invest in Housing
Robert Shiller of Yale was on Bloomberg yesterday discussing housing and his general outlook. But the most interesting comments were with regards to his general view of housing as it ...read more