Home » Most Recent Stories

THE FUND MANAGER DILEMMA

5 October 2009 by Cullen Roche 3 Comments

A recent piece of research out of David Rosenberg & Gluskin Sheff implies that the market could be losing a major source of fuel for the rally: fund managers.  Rosenberg argues that the average fund manager is now beating the index and therefore wants to “hug the index” and maintain their gains:

The average U.S. institutional fund manager is up 22% for the year, outperforming the S&P 500 by some 400 basis points.  This in turn suggests that there will be incentives to “hug the index” and try to hang on to that outperformance through year end. This in turn suggests that the stock market may end up losing a prime source of buying power — otherwise known as the panicky PM who has been desperately trying to make up for last year’s horrendous performance.

After all, with the retail investors favouring income over capital appreciation, insiders doing more selling than buying by a long shot, the dearth of corporate stock buybacks amidst cash preservation and the era of the short squeeze long behind us, it could well be that buyer exhaustion sets in as the last vestiges of demand for equities — the fund manager — moves to lock in this year’s hard-fought gains.

Rosenberg’s note is a few days old which explains the discrepancy, but nonetheless Morningstar shows that the average large cap fund is up 13.6% YTD while the S&P is up 15.3%.  Credit Suisse shows the average hedge is up just 11.6% YTD.  This jives with the usual data that the majority of fund managers in fact underperform the index.  I am not sure what data Mr. Rosenberg is looking at, but there is certainly more performance chasing to be done in order for fund managers to avoid their usual embarrassment of underperforming the major indices….As for the other data (the fundamentals that actually matter to real asset prices) – Rosenberg is dead on.

Cullen Roche

Cullen Roche

Bio - Coming Soon.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
TwitterYouTube

Disclosures - Unless otherwise noted, authors have no positions in any securities mentioned and readers should never consider this to be investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before acting on any ideas. Comments Guideline - Readers who denigrate authors or other readers will be banned without warning. This site does not tolerate any sort of reader abuse. The goal of this site is to create an environment that is conducive to learning and better understanding of the monetary system and the investment world. We expect readers to behave maturely and responsibly. We welcome and encourage intense and intelligent discourse, but the site adheres to a strict 1 strike policy. While it is your right to speak freely, it is not your right to behave childishly. Above all else, please enjoy the site. It is intended to be used as an educational tool and we hope the intelligent and mature debate will further that purpose. We hope readers will make an effort to respect that goal. Comments with excessive linking or foul language will be moderated before posting.
Comments
  • James

    Yes but TPC, you are looking at hedge funds as long only funds which they aren’t. If there is some resistance in the equity markets and easier money is made on the downside than longside then I believe you will begin to see funds short.

  • MS

    Hedgies still get compared primarily to the s&p though.

  • Cullen Roche TPC

    I think the main point is that most fund managers are not outperforming this year….