Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Loading...
Most Recent Stories

The Supply of Dead Presidents is Endogenous

Ashwin Parameswaran makes an incredibly important point here:

“Krugman completely misses the fact that the supply of “dead presidents” is endogenous.”

Dr. Krugman has once again delved into the abyss of endogenous money.   Throughout the crisis many economists have argued that the relationship between base money and the broader money supply is temporarily broken.  As if all those reserves are being held by banks or other agents because they’re near cash equivalents in a “liquidity trap”.  Dr. Krugman says that this is even more true due to the fact that the monetary base has historically been composed of cash.

But Ashwin makes the crucial point here.  Cash levels are endogenous.  Ie, their amounts in circulation are determined by the demand of the users of private bank money. As I’ve explained before, cash comes from outside the private sector when the US Treasury gets an order from the Fed for cash notes.  But the Fed only issues these orders when the demand from their members banks increases.  Why is this?  It is because cash is merely a facilitating feature of private bank money.  In other words, you can’t even obtain cash unless have an account at a bank whose vaults are stuffed with Federal Reserve Notes in the case that you might need some for the purposes of conveniently transacting in these notes.

These ideas of “high powered money” and the “monetary base” are unfortunate terms that muddy the waters in understanding how money is created and how the monetary system works.  In a world of endogenous money where almost all money is created by banks these concepts get large facets of the workings of the monetary system wrong.  Now, I don’t doubt that monetary policy will become more effective outside of the balance sheet recession.  But the end of the balance sheet recession won’t magically bring the money multiplier back to life.  It’s dead.  It’s always been dead and we should make sure this myth remains very dead.

Comments are closed.