<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE VIX FUTURES SPREAD COULD BE FORECASTING A DOWNTURN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/the-vix-futures-spread-could-be-forecasting-a-downturn/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/the-vix-futures-spread-could-be-forecasting-a-downturn</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:58:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/the-vix-futures-spread-could-be-forecasting-a-downturn#comment-7805</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=11521#comment-7805</guid>
		<description>Kitteh - I agree with you.  It seems unlikely that there is a major downturn when people are expecting it to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kitteh &#8211; I agree with you.  It seems unlikely that there is a major downturn when people are expecting it to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trader Kitteh</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/the-vix-futures-spread-could-be-forecasting-a-downturn#comment-7787</link>
		<dc:creator>Trader Kitteh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/?p=11521#comment-7787</guid>
		<description>The logic in the article is backwards it seems.  It states that the spread was 1.05 at Aug 08, just on the door step on the downturn.  So what we know as a proven fact, is that a small spread signals complacency (leading to a crash...).  The spread is large now, shouldn&#039;t the inference be that investors are overly gittery (hence a crash unlikely) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The logic in the article is backwards it seems.  It states that the spread was 1.05 at Aug 08, just on the door step on the downturn.  So what we know as a proven fact, is that a small spread signals complacency (leading to a crash&#8230;).  The spread is large now, shouldn&#8217;t the inference be that investors are overly gittery (hence a crash unlikely) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
