<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE YEN AND DOLLAR HAVE TO WEAKEN?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragcap.com/the-yen-and-dollar-have-to-weaken/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragcap.com/the-yen-and-dollar-have-to-weaken</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 09:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker</title>
		<link>http://pragcap.com/the-yen-and-dollar-have-to-weaken/comment-page-1#comment-891</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragcap.com/the-yen-and-dollar-have-to-weaken#comment-891</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  I&#039;m very much a layman, not an economist (but learning fast in these times), but it seems that this also ties in with the Treasury play and oil.  Everybody&#039;s convinced that Treasuries will be going down in the near future and that oil is a sure thing to go up (i.e. inflation is sure to be a problem, and soon). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The contrarian in me says these are too easy.  If that&#039;s what everybody thinks and is betting on, maybe they&#039;re wrong, at least in terms of the time frame.  If debt deflation is really the dominant force in the next few years then that puts the lie to these theses.  And I&#039;m becoming more convinced that that is the case, and we&#039;re all in denial about it.  Clearly the Fed is mitigating that force, but the question is can Bernanke win that battle.  Mish thinks not.  I&#039;m beginning to think this is the way to play things in the near future.  It also portends a lower market which I think we will and should have.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course gold is a mystery and may be a good play even in this scenario.  The uncertainty/crisis play.  That&#039;s also Mish&#039;s viewpoint, I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I&#39;m very much a layman, not an economist (but learning fast in these times), but it seems that this also ties in with the Treasury play and oil.  Everybody&#39;s convinced that Treasuries will be going down in the near future and that oil is a sure thing to go up (i.e. inflation is sure to be a problem, and soon). </p>
<p>The contrarian in me says these are too easy.  If that&#39;s what everybody thinks and is betting on, maybe they&#39;re wrong, at least in terms of the time frame.  If debt deflation is really the dominant force in the next few years then that puts the lie to these theses.  And I&#39;m becoming more convinced that that is the case, and we&#39;re all in denial about it.  Clearly the Fed is mitigating that force, but the question is can Bernanke win that battle.  Mish thinks not.  I&#39;m beginning to think this is the way to play things in the near future.  It also portends a lower market which I think we will and should have.</p>
<p>Of course gold is a mystery and may be a good play even in this scenario.  The uncertainty/crisis play.  That&#39;s also Mish&#39;s viewpoint, I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

